| Literature DB >> 29581515 |
Rekha Sharma1, Ankita Dhillon1, Dinesh Kumar2.
Abstract
The present paper reports a facile and selective colorimetric method for the detection of potentiEntities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29581515 PMCID: PMC5980094 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23469-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1UV-vis absorption spectra of the AgNO3 solution, MLE, and M-AgNPs, inset shows (a) M-AgNPs prepared by the heating method and at room-temperature, (b) stability of M-AgNPs after 1 month.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of MLE, M-AgNPs, and M-AgNPs with Al(III).
Figure 3UV-vis spectra of the M-AgNPs prepared at different (a) solution pHs, the inset shows colorimetric change at pH, (b) MLE volumes, the inset shows the photographs of the corresponding solutions, (c) time intervals, and (d) temperatures, the inset shows the photographs of corresponding solutions.
Figure 4(a) SEM image of M-AgNPs before and (b) after interaction with Al(III), (c) TEM image of M-AgNPs before and (d) after interaction with Al(III).
Figure 5Schematic representation of synthesis and Al(III) induced aggregation of M-AgNPs.
Figure 6(a) TGA, (b) SAED, (c) EDX analysis of M-AgNPs before and (d) after interaction with Al(III).
Figure 7UV-vis spectra of the M-AgNPs upon addition of different metal ions, (b) visual color change of the M-AgNPs with various metal ions.
Figure 8(a) UV-vis spectra of the M-AgNPs upon addition of different Al(III) ion concentrations, and (b) visual color change of the M-AgNPs with various Al(III) ion concentrations.
Figure 9XPS spectra of the green synthesized silver nanoparticles of (a) Ag 3d before, and (b) Ag 3d after addition of Al(III) ions.
Figure 10XPS spectra of (a) C 1 s before; (b) C 1 s after addition of Al(III); (c) Al 2p XPS spectra; and (d) O 1 s before; (e) O 1 s after addition of Al(III).
Figure 11M-AgNPs colorimetric response as the function of Al(III) ion concentration in tap water samples.
Comparative study of various reported sensors with present work in terms of reducing and stabilizing agent, pH, and limit of detection.
| Method | Detection probe | Reducing agent | Stabilizing agent | Sample matrix | LOD (nM) | pH | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorimetric | AuNPs | Citrate | MMT* | Water and urine samples | 14.29 | 8.0 |
[ |
| Colorimetric | AuNPs | Citrate | Citrate | water | 26 | 2.9 |
[ |
| Colorimetric | AuNPs | NaBH4 | Ionic liquid | Vermicelli | 26 | — |
[ |
| Fluorescent | Chalcone based organic nanoparticles | — | — | Lake and tap water | 29 | 7.0 |
[ |
| Colorimetric and fluorescent | 1-H* | — | — | Abiotic and living cells | 16 | 7.4 |
[ |
| Colorimetric | AgNPs | Mentha | Mentha | Tap water | 1 | 10.5 | This work |
MMT* = 5-mercaptomethyltetrazole.
1-H* = 1-[[(2-furanylmethyl)imino)methyl]-2-naphthol.
Figure 12Plots of log (a/a-x) versus time (t) for kinetic study of selectivity of sensor probe with different metal ions.
The first-order rate constants for different metal ions.
| Metal ions | Slope/rate constant (min−1) | R2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cr(III) | 0.00340 | 0.66 |
| Fe(III) | 0.00367 | 0.69 |
| Mn(II) | 0.00387 | 0.72 |
| Al(III) | 0.01907 | 0.99 |
Thermodynamic parameters of the detection probe.
| S. No. | Metal Ions | T (K) | ΔG0 (kJ mol−1) | ΔH0 (kJ mol−1) | ΔS0 (J mol−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. |
| 298 | −4.224 | 44.56 | 0.1637 |
| 303 | −5.042 | ||||
| 313 | −5.689 | ||||
| 2. |
| 298 | 2.531 | 19.501 | 0.0569 |
| 303 | 2.246 | ||||
| 313 | 1.965 | ||||
| 3. |
| 298 | 2.670 | 24.549 | 0.0734 |
| 303 | 2.303 | ||||
| 313 | 2.073 | ||||
| 4. |
| 298 | 2.744 | 29.044 | 0.0882 |
| 303 | 2.303 | ||||
| 313 | 2.073 |