Literature DB >> 35621291

Micro-cost analysis of single-use vs. reusable cystoscopy in a single-payer healthcare system.

Jaehoon Kim1, Bruce Gao1, Naeem Bhojani2, Kevin C Zorn2, Bilal Chughtai3, Dean S Elterman1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Single-use flexible diagnostic cystoscopy has recently been developed with comparable functionality to reusable cystoscopes. Prior studies have demonstrated considerable upfront costs of reusable cystoscopy. The objective of this study was to compare costs of reusable cystoscopy to single-use cystoscopy in a single-payer, socialized healthcare system.
METHODS: A retrospective micro-cost analysis of reusable cystoscopy in a combined inpatient and outpatient setting at a single institution was performed. The cost analysis was divided into capital, maintenance, reprocessing, and labor. Annual costs were averaged over two fiscal years. Costs were amortized over five- and 10-year bases as appropriate. The results were compared to theoretical costs of single-use cystoscopes.
RESULTS: There were 3415 annual average cystoscopy cases with 171 cases per reusable cystoscope. The capital, maintenance, reprocessing, and labor costs of reusable cystoscopy were $96 000, $99 867, $247 855, and $65 317, respectively. The total annual costs per case for reusable and single-use cystoscopy were $149.06 and $245.57, respectively. The costs of reusable cystoscopy decreased with the number of procedures per year and intersected the costs of single-use cystoscopes at 1265 procedures per year. All costs were calculated in Canadian dollars ($CAD).
CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of reusable cystoscopes is dependent on cystoscopy volume due to considerable upfront costs. Single-use cystoscopes are more cost-effective if the total number of cases performed is less than 1265 per year. Additional investigation into the cost-effectiveness of single-use cystoscopes as supplements in the outpatient setting or primary endoscopes in inpatient/emergency settings should be performed.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35621291      PMCID: PMC9565074          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   2.052


  19 in total

1.  Outpatient flexible cystoscopy and fulguration of recurrent superficial bladder tumors.

Authors:  H W Herr
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The 'top 10' urological procedures: a study of hospital episodes statistics 1998-99.

Authors:  F Lee; H R H Patel; M Emberton
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.

Authors:  Sarah C Beebe; Lawrence C Jenkins; Tasha Posid; Bodo E Knudsen; Michael W Sourial
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  The new grasper-integrated single use flexible cystoscope for double J stent removal: evaluation of image quality, flow and flexibility.

Authors:  M Talso; E Emiliani; M Baghdadi; A Orosa; P Servian; A Barreiro; S Proietti; O Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris™): a European prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Guido Kamphuis; Guido Giusti; J L Palmero; J M Patterson; Silvia Proietti; Michael Straub; Jean de la Rosette; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Outpatient diagnostic of bladder tumours in flexible cystoscopes: evaluation of fluorescence-guided flexible cystoscopy and bladder biopsies.

Authors:  Gregers G Hermann; Karin Mogensen; Birgitte Grønkær Toft; Anders Glenthøj; Helle M Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-12-12

7.  An outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infections following outpatient flexible cystoscopy.

Authors:  Elodie Sorbets; Marine Evrevin; Estelle Jumas-Bilak; Agnès Masnou; Anne Lotthé; Rodolphe Thuret; Pascale Chaize; Frederic Peyremorte; Sara Romano-Bertrand; Sylvie Parer
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Efficacy of office fulguration for recurrent low grade papillary bladder tumors less than 0.5 cm.

Authors:  S Machele Donat; Amanda North; Guido Dalbagni; Harry W Herr
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Infectious diseases linked to cross-contamination of flexible endoscopes.

Authors:  Nikki Kenters; Elisabeth G W Huijskens; Corianne Meier; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-08

10.  The grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope is comparable to the reusable, flexible cystoscope for the detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Raouf M Seyam; Omar M Zeitouni; Tarek M Alsibai; Abdulrahman J AlAyoub; Osamah M Al-Qassab; Mhd A AlDeiry; Ahmad O Zino; Hasan S Hulwi; Alaa A Mokhtar; Mahmoud Shahbaz; Noor N Junejo; Mohamed F Alotaibi; Hassan M Alzahrani; Khaled I Alothman; Sultan S Alkhateeb; Turki O Al-Hussain; Waleed M Altaweel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.