Literature DB >> 32600072

Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.

Sarah C Beebe1, Lawrence C Jenkins1, Tasha Posid1, Bodo E Knudsen1, Michael W Sourial1.   

Abstract

Background: A single-use flexible cystoscope with integrated grasper (Isiris; Coloplast, Denmark) has recently become commercially available. The objective of our study is to compare the costs of stent removal in an outpatient clinical environment between the single-use Isiris system (Coloplast) to our existing approach using a reusable cystoscope and stent grasper. Materials and
Methods: The number of stent removal procedures at our tertiary center was recorded as a proportion of all cystoscopic procedures performed between February 2016 and February 2017. Elements in the micro-cost assessment included original purchasing price of an Olympus digital reusable cystoscope, repair fee (based on a 1-year contract), sterilization equipment and accessory costs, reprocessing costs of the cystoscope, and labor costs. The costs were estimated on a per-use basis and compared to the purchasing price of Isiris.
Results: A total of 1775 cystoscopic procedures were performed, and the reusable cystoscope was used for stent removal in 871 (49%) cases. The per-use cost for stent removal procedures using the reusable cystoscope was estimated to be $161.85. The single per-use purchasing price for the Isiris device is $200. Based on the current volume, the break-even point was calculated to be 704 stent pulls. After 704 stent pulls, the cost benefit favors the reusable cystoscope.
Conclusion: Based on this micro-cost analysis, per-use costs appear to favor the reusable cystoscope for stent removal. It appears that centers with high volumes of stent pulls may find the reusable cystoscope and stent grasper more cost beneficial than the single-use system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Isiris; cost analysis; cystoscopy; stent removal

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32600072     DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  3 in total

1.  Outcomes and Cost Evaluation Related to a Single-Use, Disposable Ureteric Stent Removal System: a Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Hughes; Amelia Pietropaolo; Patrick Jones; Marco Oderda; Paolo Gontero; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Micro-cost analysis of single-use vs. reusable cystoscopy in a single-payer healthcare system.

Authors:  Jaehoon Kim; Bruce Gao; Naeem Bhojani; Kevin C Zorn; Bilal Chughtai; Dean S Elterman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.052

3.  Market Readiness for Single-Use Cystoscopes According to Urologists and Procurement Managers Worldwide.

Authors:  Dinah Rindorf; Sara Larsen; Lotte Ockert; Helene Jung; Claus Dahl
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-05-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.