| Literature DB >> 35620795 |
Inês P Moreira1,2, Carina Esteves1,2, Susana I C J Palma1,2, Efthymia Ramou1,2, Ana L M Carvalho1,2, Ana C A Roque1,2.
Abstract
Silk fibroin is a biobased material with excellent biocompatibility and mechanical properties, but its use in bioelectronics is hampered by the difficult dissolution and low intrinsic conductivity. Some ionic liquids are known to dissolve fibroin but removed after fibroin processing. However, ionic liquids and fibroin can cooperatively give rise to functional materials, and there are untapped opportunities in this combination. The dissolution of fibroin, followed by gelation, in designer ionic liquids from the imidazolium chloride family with varied alkyl chain lengths (2-10 carbons) is shown here. The alkyl chain length of the anion has a large impact on fibroin secondary structure which adopts unconventional arrangements, yielding robust gels with distinct hierarchical organization. Furthermore, and due to their remarkable air-stability and ionic conductivity, fibroin ionogels are exploited as active electrical gas sensors in an electronic nose revealing the unravelled possibilities of fibroin in soft and flexible electronics.Entities:
Keywords: Bioelectronics; Gas sensing; Ionic conductivity; Ionic liquids; Physical ionogels; Silk fibroin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35620795 PMCID: PMC9127357 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Today Bio ISSN: 2590-0064
Composition of fibroin ionogels. ∗Water content measured by Karl Fischer titration.
| Ionic Liquid | Structure | Fibroin Ionogel | Fibroin (% w/w) | Ionic liquid (% w/w) | Water added (% w/w) | Water in the IL (%)∗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C2mimCl | C2F | 8.3 | 91.7 | 0 | 1.72 ± 0.23 | |
| C6mimCl | C6F | 8.8 | 91.2 | 0 | 1.17 ± 0.32 | |
| C10mimCl | C10F | 6.4 | 87.9 | 6.07 | 0.79 ± 0.21 |
Fig. 1Fibroin ionogels. (A) Schematic representation of fibroin ionogels and proposed predominant secondary structures. After dissolution of lyophilised fibroin and gelation in C2, C6 and C10mimCl ionic liquids, different fibroin secondary structures are observed. Scales are exaggerated for clarification. (B) Inverted glass vials containing fibroin ionogels. (C) Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) topography and (D) Polarised Optical Microscopy (POM) taken with crossed polarisers at 90° of fibroin ionogels. The white line corresponds to 100 μm.
Fig. 2Mechanical and structural characterisation of fibroin ionogels. (A) Rheology Frequency sweep measurements of fibroin ionogels C2F, C6F and C10F. (B) Rheology Frequency sweep measurements of fibroin hydrogel and heat/cooled C10HC. (C) ATR-FTIR spectra (Amide region) of fibroin ionogels C2F, C6F and C10F, using the heat/cooled ILs as background, and compared with fibroin hydrogel, highlighting the Amide I band. (D) Secondary structure content from deconvolution of peaks at the Amide I band of ATR-FTIR spectra for each of the samples. (E) X-ray scattering 2θ scans of fibroin ionogels C2F, C6F, C10F and fibroin hydrogel, with distances in Å annotated on top, and (F) taken from scattering ring intensity analysis.
Fig. 3Stability to air and temperature and ionic conductivity of fibroin ionogels. Stability study of fibroin ionogels C2F, C6F and C10F versus fibroin hydrogel throughout time, upon storage of the open vials at ambient conditions (T ≈ 20 °C; RH ≈ 50%). (A) Weight variance throughout storage time, comparing the mass at each time with the initial mass; Water content after 1 day and 30 days – equilibrated samples in the inset. (B) Macroscopic aspect of the gels after storage for 1 and 30 days, including when picked with the tweezers. (C) TGA analysis of fibroin ionogels versus hydrogel when heating the fibroin ionogels and hydrogel at 10 °C/min. (D) Ionic conductivity spectra of fibroin iono- and hydrogels at ambient conditions.
Fig. 4Application of fibroin ionogels in gas sensing. VOC sensing experiment using the in-house developed electronic nose. (A) Macroscopic aspect of C10F films spread on top of a glass slide patterned with interdigitated gold electrodes after used on the electronic nose. (B) Typical cycle signals of a C10F sensor upon exposure to different VOCs and water. Each curve represents the average and standard deviation of at least 19 replicate cycles from a same sensor. VOC exposure periods (5 s) are highlighted in grey. (C) Typical cycle signal of the sensors made of fibroin ionogels and heat/cooled ionic liquid C10HC when exposed to methanol (5 s, highlighted in grey). The lines and shadow are the average signal and standard deviation of the 2 independent sensors. (D) Representation of all the cycles performed during the 7.5 min experiment with methanol when using 2 independent C10F films as sensors. The line and shadow are the average signal and standard deviation of 2 independent sensors. (E) Comparison of correct VOC prediction rates obtained when using each fibroin ionogel and heat/cooled ionic liquid C10HC as gas sensors. (F) Overall correct VOC prediction rate for each sensor, given by the average of the correct prediction rate of all the VOCs.