| Literature DB >> 35620125 |
Kenneth M Lin1, Naomi E Gadinsky1, Craig E Klinger1,2, Laura J Kleeblad3, Kevin G Shea4, Jonathan P Dyke5, David L Helfet1, Scott A Rodeo1, Daniel W Green1, Lionel E Lazaro6.
Abstract
Purpose: Injury to or abnormality of developing distal femoral chondroepiphysis blood supply has been implicated in osteochondritis dissecans development. Progressive decrease in epiphyseal cartilage blood supply occurs in normal development; however, based on animal studies, it is hypothesized that there is greater decrease in regions more prone to osteochondritis dissecans lesions. We aimed to quantify differential regional perfusion of the immature distal femoral chondroepiphysis. We hypothesized there is decreased perfusion in the lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle, the classic osteochondritis dissecans lesion location.Entities:
Keywords: Chondroepiphysis vascularity; basic science; diagnosis; distal femur; osteochondritis dissecans; post-natal; quantitative MRI
Year: 2022 PMID: 35620125 PMCID: PMC9127880 DOI: 10.1177/18632521221084179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.917
Figure 1.ROI zones used for quantification of post-contrast signal enhancement in the distal femoral chondroepiphysis.
Figure 2.The medial and lateral condyles were divided into anterior and posterior sub-regions for quantification of post-contrast signal enhancement to the anterior and posterior aspects of the condyles. The mid-sagittal line was drawn on sagittal projections, and signal enhancement anterior or posterior to the sagittal midline was compared between medial (zones 1 and 2) and lateral (zones 3 and 4) condyles.
Individual ROI percent increase in signal enhancement following contrast administration.
| Specimen data | Individual ROI zones | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SID | Months | Gender | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 1 | 0 | F | 10.4% | 21.9% | 10.5% | 12.0% | 22.8% | 22.5% |
| 2 | 2 | M | 19.4% | 14.3% | 17.7% | 19.9% | 15.3% | 13.5% |
| 3 | 2 | M | 17.0% | 9.3% | 10.3% | 23.8% | 17.0% | 22.6% |
| 4 | 5 | M | 11.6% | 15.4% | 16.5% | 21.2% | 22.6% | 12.7% |
| 5 | 6 | M | 19.5% | 17.2% | 21.9% | 11.3% | 17.7% | 12.4% |
| Mean | 15.6% | 15.6% | 15.4% | 17.6% | 19.1% | 16.7% | ||
| SD | 4.3% | 4.6% | 5.0% | 5.7% | 3.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Median | 17.0% | 15.4% | 16.5% | 19.9% | 11.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Range | 11.0%–19.4%a | 11.8%–19.6%a | 10.4%–19.8%a | 11.6%–22.5%a | 16.1%–22.7%a | 12.6%–22.5%a | ||
ROI: regions of interest; SID: specimen identification (number); SD: standard deviation.
Ranges are reported as interquartile ranges (25–75th percentile).
Average arterial contribution to various regions of medial versus lateral condyle.
| Region | ROI zones | Average difference in signal enhancement (M-L, ±SD) | p-value
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole condyles | M: 1, 2, 5 | 0.5% (±4.8% M, ±4.8% L) | 0.917 |
| Anterior whole condyles
| M: 1, 2, 5 | –1.6% (±5.0% M, ±7.1% L) | 0.917 |
| Posterior whole condyles
| M: 1, 2, 5 | 2.1% (±4.1% M, ±5.1% L) | 0.175 |
| Proximal | M: 5 | 2.3% (±3.4% M, ±5.3% L) | 0.251 |
| Distal | M: 1, 2 | 0.2% (±4.5% M, ±7.1% L) | 0.917 |
| Inner | M: 2 | 0.2% (±4.6% M, ±5.0% L) | 0.754 |
| Outer | M: 1 | –2.1% (±4.3% M, ±5.7% L) | 0.251 |
| Anterior-distal
| M: 1,2 | –0.7 (±3.2% M, ±3.5% L) | 0.917 |
| Posterior-distal
| M: 1, 2 | –1.1% (±2.6% M, ±6.1% L) | 0.602 |
ROI: regions of interest; M: medial; L: lateral; SD: standard deviation.
Mann–Whitney test.
Anterior to mid-sagittal line.
Posterior to mid-sagittal line.
Figure 3.Perfusion to inner and outer aspects of the medial condyle: (a) schematic illustrates ROI zones used for quantification and (b) there was no difference in post-contrast signal enhancement to either side of the medial condyle (15.6% to both inner and outer regions); error bars represent standard deviation.