Literature DB >> 3561975

Biomechanical aspects of bone autografts and allografts.

R R Pelker, G E Friedlaender.   

Abstract

The structural requirements of skeletal reconstruction should be included in the consideration of an appropriate type of bone graft, whether autogenous or allogeneic tissues are chosen. This analysis should include the nature of any fixation devices to be used, as well as characteristics of the host and donor bone. The mechanical properties and biomechanical response of the graft must be balanced against the type and magnitude of the load to which the graft will be subject. For example, the information presented here suggests that, from a biomechanical perspective, frozen bone would be better suited than freeze-dried bone when the graft is subject to large torsional loads or else the graft must be appropriately protected during incorporation by adequate internal fixation or external bracing. In a situation that is primarily subjected to compressive loads, however, freeze-dried grafts would be just as biomechanically sound. Thus, an understanding of the normal biomechanics of the anatomic region to be reconstructed is crucial. The mechanical properties of the graft are affected by preservation, storage, and sterilization. Incorporation and remodeling of the graft further alter its properties. These properties are, in turn, influenced by the host immune response as well as the local biomechanical environment. The influence of each of these factors is predictable. Obviously, there are numerous considerations in choosing approaches to skeletal reconstruction other than the mechanical issues discussed here. However, an understanding of the mechanical properties involved will help in optimizing the clinical success of these choices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3561975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  12 in total

Review 1.  Anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  P W Pavlov
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Safety and efficacy of an electron beam melting technique-manufactured titanium mesh cage for lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Timo Zippelius; Patrick Strube; Farid Suleymanov; Michael Putzier; Alexander Hölzl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Comparing the process of creeping substitution between allograft bone and local bone grafting in lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Chun Jiang; ZhenZhou Feng; Xiaoxing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Principles of bone and tissue banking in Saudi Arabia: 10-year experience report.

Authors:  Imran Ilyas; Anwar M Al-Rabiah; Thamer S Alhussainan; Husam A Alrumaih; Abdulelah B Fallatah; Shuruq A Alsakran; Omar A Al-Mohrej
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Allogenic versus autologous cancellous bone in lumbar segmental spondylodesis: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Patrick Strube; Julia F Funk; Christian Gross; Hans-Joachim Mönig; Carsten Perka; Axel Pruss
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Bone cements and fillers: a review.

Authors:  S M Kenny; M Buggy
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Comparative biomechanical and microstructural analysis of native versus peracetic acid-ethanol treated cancellous bone graft.

Authors:  Juliane Rauh; Florian Despang; Jorgen Baas; Cornelia Liebers; Axel Pruss; Michael Gelinsky; Klaus-Peter Günther; Maik Stiehler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Fabrication of polylactic acid (PLA)-based porous scaffold through the combination of traditional bio-fabrication and 3D printing technology for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Xiaqing Zhou; Gan Zhou; Radoslaw Junka; Ningxiao Chang; Aneela Anwar; Haoyu Wang; Xiaojun Yu
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 5.268

9.  In vitro characterization of hierarchical 3D scaffolds produced by combining additive manufacturing and thermally induced phase separation.

Authors:  Azizeh-Mitra Yousefi; Joseph Powers; Kaylie Sampson; Katherine Wood; Carter Gadola; Jing Zhang; Paul F James
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.517

10.  The effect of particle size on the osteointegration of injectable silicate-substituted calcium phosphate bone substitute materials.

Authors:  Melanie J Coathup; Qian Cai; Charlie Campion; Thomas Buckland; Gordon W Blunn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.