Literature DB >> 35618419

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Assess HPV-Positive versus HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Importance of b-Values.

V Lenoir1, B M A Delattre1, Y M'RaD1, C De Vito2, T de Perrot1, M Becker3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Controversy exists as to whether ADC histograms are capable to distinguish human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) from human papillomavirus-negative (HPV-) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. We investigated how the choice of b-values influences the capability of ADC histograms to distinguish between the two tumor types.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with histologically proved primary oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (11 HPV+ and 23 HPV-) underwent 3T MR imaging with a single-shot EPI DWI sequence with 6 b-values (0, 50, 100, 500, 750, 1000 s/mm2). Monoexponentially calculated perfusion-sensitive (including b=0 s/mm2) and perfusion-insensitive/true diffusion ADC maps (with b ≥ 100 s/mm2 as the lowest b-value) were generated using Matlab. The choice of b-values included 2 b-values (ADCb0-1000, ADCb100-1000, ADCb500-1000, ADCb750-1000) and 3-6 b-values (ADCb0-750-1000, ADCb0-500-750-1000, ADCb0-50-100-1000, ADCb0-50-100-750-1000, ADCb0-50-100-500-750-1000). Readers blinded to the HPV- status contoured all tumors. ROIs were then copied onto ADC maps, and their histograms were compared.
RESULTS: ADC histogram metrics in HPV+ and HPV- oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma changed significantly depending on the b-values. The mean ADC was lower, and skewness was higher in HPV+ than in HPV- oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma only for ADCb0-1000, ADCb0-750-1000, and ADCb0-500-750-1000 (P < .05), allowing distinction between the 2 tumor types. Kurtosis was significantly higher in HPV+ versus HPV- oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma for all b-value combinations except 2 perfusion-insensitive maps (ADCb500-1000 and ADCb750-1000). Among all b-value combinations, kurtosis on ADCb0-1000 had the highest diagnostic performance to distinguish HPV+ from HPV- oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (area under the curve = 0.893; sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 82.6%). Acquiring multiple b-values for ADC calculation did not improve the distinction between HPV+ and HPV- oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: The choice of b-values significantly affects ADC histogram metrics in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Distinguishing HPV+ from HPV- oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is best possible on the ADCb0-1000 map.
© 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35618419      PMCID: PMC9172942          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   4.966


  21 in total

Review 1.  HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: An update on testing in routine pathology practice.

Authors:  Justin A Bishop; James S Lewis; James W Rocco; William C Faquin
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histograms of Human Papillomavirus-Positive and Human Papillomavirus-Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Assessment of Tumor Heterogeneity and Comparison with Histopathology.

Authors:  T de Perrot; V Lenoir; M Domingo Ayllón; N Dulguerov; M Pusztaszeri; M Becker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Use of quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to predict human papilloma virus status in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mitsuhiko Nakahira; Naoko Saito; Hiroshi Yamaguchi; Kiyomi Kuba; Masashi Sugasawa
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States.

Authors:  Anil K Chaturvedi; Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Brenda Y Hernandez; Weihong Xiao; Esther Kim; Bo Jiang; Marc T Goodman; Maria Sibug-Saber; Wendy Cozen; Lihua Liu; Charles F Lynch; Nicolas Wentzensen; Richard C Jordan; Sean Altekruse; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Is p16 immunohistochemistry a more cost-effective method for identification of human papilloma virus-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Jaiyeola Thomas; Thad Primeaux
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.090

6.  Quantitative diffusion magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of human papillomavirus status in head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seyedmehdi Payabvash; Aimee Chan; Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Ajay Malhotra
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2019-05-14

7.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Guoying Liu; Dow Mu Koh; Thomas L Chenevert; Harriet C Thoeny; Taro Takahara; Andrew Dzik-Jurasz; Brian D Ross; Marc Van Cauteren; David Collins; Dima A Hammoud; Gordon J S Rustin; Bachir Taouli; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.715

8.  Effect of HPV Status on Survival of Oropharynx Cancer with Distant Metastasis.

Authors:  Adam W Kaplon; Thomas J Galloway; Mihir K Bhayani; Jeffrey C Liu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  The Predictive Value of Early Assessment After 1 Cycle of Induction Chemotherapy with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Response to Radical Chemoradiotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kee H Wong; Rafal Panek; Liam Welsh; Dualta Mcquaid; Alex Dunlop; Angela Riddell; Iain Murray; Yong Du; Sue Chua; Dow-Mu Koh; Shreerang Bhide; Chris Nutting; Wim J G Oyen; Kevin Harrington; Kate L Newbold
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  UK quantitative WB-DWI technical workgroup: consensus meeting recommendations on optimisation, quality control, processing and analysis of quantitative whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging for cancer.

Authors:  Anna Barnes; Roberto Alonzi; Matthew Blackledge; Geoff Charles-Edwards; David J Collins; Gary Cook; Glynn Coutts; Vicky Goh; Martin Graves; Charles Kelly; Dow-Mu Koh; Hazel McCallum; Marc E Miquel; James O'Connor; Anwar Padhani; Rachel Pearson; Andrew Priest; Andrea Rockall; James Stirling; Stuart Taylor; Nina Tunariu; Jan van der Meulen; Darren Walls; Jessica Winfield; Shonit Punwani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.