Literature DB >> 35617219

Alcohol use disorder, psychiatric comorbidities, marriage and divorce in a high-risk sample.

Nathaniel S Thomas1, Sally I-Chun Kuo2, Fazil Aliev2, Vivia V McCutcheon2, Jacquelyn M Meyers3, Grace Chan2, Victor Hesselbrock2, Chella Kamarajan3, Sivan Kinreich3, John R Kramer2, Samuel Kuperman2, Dongbing Lai4, Martin H Plawecki2, Bernice Porjesz3, Marc A Schuckit4, Danielle M Dick2, Kathleen K Bucholz1, Jessica E Salvatore1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between alcohol use disorder (AUD), its psychiatric comorbidities, and their interactions, with marital outcomes in a diverse high-risk, genetically informative sample.
METHOD: Participants included European ancestry (EA; n = 4,045) and African ancestry (AA; n = 1,550) individuals from the multigenerational Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) sample (56% female, Mage ∼ 41 years). Outcomes were lifetime marriage and divorce. Predictors included lifetime AUD, an alcohol problems polygenic score (PRS), and AUD comorbidities, including conduct or antisocial personality disorder (ASP), cannabis dependence/abuse (CAN), frequent tobacco use (TOB), and major depressive disorder (MDD). Mixed effect Cox models and generalized linear mixed effects models were fit.
RESULTS: Among EA participants, those with AUD and CAN were less likely to marry (hazard ratios [HRs] 0.70-0.83, ps < 0.01). Among AA participants, those with AUD and TOB were less likely to marry (HRs 0.66-0.82, ps < 0.05) and those with MDD were more likely to marry (HR = 1.34, ps < 0.01). Among EA participants, AUD, CAN, TOB, and MDD were associated with higher odds of divorce (odds ratios [ORs] 1.59-2.21, ps < 0.01). Among AA participants, no predictors were significantly associated with divorce. Significant random effects indicated genetic and environmental influences on marriage, but only environmental factors on divorce.
CONCLUSIONS: In a high-risk sample, AUD was associated with reduced likelihood of marriage in EA and AA individuals and increased risk of divorce in EA individuals. These associations were largely independent of comorbidities. Genetic and environmental background factors contributed to marriage, while only environmental background factors contributed to divorce. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35617219      PMCID: PMC9247836          DOI: 10.1037/adb0000840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  57 in total

1.  Marriage and Divorce: A genetic perspective.

Authors:  Beth A Jerskey; Matthew S Panizzon; Kristen C Jacobson; Michael C Neale; Michael D Grant; Mark Schultz; Seth A Eisen; Ming T Tsuang; Michael J Lyons
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2010-10-01

2.  The effects of psychiatric disorders on the probability and timing of first marriage.

Authors:  M S Forthofer; R C Kessler; A L Story; I H Gotlib
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1996-06

3.  Random-effects Cox proportional hazards model: general variance components methods for time-to-event data.

Authors:  V Shane Pankratz; Mariza de Andrade; Terry M Therneau
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Alcohol use disorder and divorce: evidence for a genetic correlation in a population-based Swedish sample.

Authors:  Jessica E Salvatore; Sara Larsson Lönn; Jan Sundquist; Paul Lichtenstein; Kristina Sundquist; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Substance use behaviors and the timing of family formation during young adulthood.

Authors:  Bohyun Joy Jang; Megan E Patrick; Megan S Schuler
Journal:  J Fam Issues       Date:  2017-05-19

6.  Social and economic consequences of alcohol use disorder: a longitudinal cohort and co-relative analysis.

Authors:  K S Kendler; H Ohlsson; K J Karriker-Jaffe; J Sundquist; K Sundquist
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  The heritability of alcohol use disorders: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies.

Authors:  B Verhulst; M C Neale; K S Kendler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Defining a never-smoker: results from the nonsmokers survey.

Authors:  Cynthia S Pomerleau; Ovide F Pomerleau; Sandy M Snedecor; Ann M Mehringer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 9.  The relationship between different dimensions of alcohol use and the burden of disease-an update.

Authors:  Jürgen Rehm; Gerhard E Gmel; Gerrit Gmel; Omer S M Hasan; Sameer Imtiaz; Svetlana Popova; Charlotte Probst; Michael Roerecke; Robin Room; Andriy V Samokhvalov; Kevin D Shield; Paul A Shuper
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Genome-wide association study of alcohol consumption and use disorder in 274,424 individuals from multiple populations.

Authors:  Henry R Kranzler; Hang Zhou; Rachel L Kember; Rachel Vickers Smith; Amy C Justice; Scott Damrauer; Philip S Tsao; Derek Klarin; Aris Baras; Jeffrey Reid; John Overton; Daniel J Rader; Zhongshan Cheng; Janet P Tate; William C Becker; John Concato; Ke Xu; Renato Polimanti; Hongyu Zhao; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.