Literature DB >> 34725754

A toolkit for quantification of biological age from blood chemistry and organ function test data: BioAge.

Dayoon Kwon1,2, Daniel W Belsky3,4.   

Abstract

Methods to quantify biological aging are emerging as new measurement tools for epidemiology and population science and have been proposed as surrogate measures for healthy lifespan extension in geroscience clinical trials. Publicly available software packages to compute biological aging measurements from DNA methylation data have accelerated dissemination of these measures and generated rapid gains in knowledge about how different measures perform in a range of datasets. Biological age measures derived from blood chemistry data were introduced at the same time as the DNA methylation measures and, in multiple studies, demonstrate superior performance to these measures in prediction of healthy lifespan. However, their dissemination has been slow by comparison, resulting in a significant gap in knowledge. We developed a software package to help address this knowledge gap. The BioAge R package, available for download at GitHub ( http://github.com/dayoonkwon/BioAge ), implements three published methods to quantify biological aging based on analysis of chronological age and mortality risk: Klemera-Doubal biological age, PhenoAge, and homeostatic dysregulation. The package allows users to parametrize measurement algorithms using custom sets of biomarkers, to compare the resulting measurements to published versions of the Klemera-Doubal method and PhenoAge algorithms, and to score the measurements in new datasets. We applied BioAge to safety lab data from the CALERIE™ randomized controlled trial, the first-ever human trial of long-term calorie restriction in healthy, non-obese adults, to test effects of intervention on biological aging. Results contribute evidence that CALERIE intervention slowed biological aging. BioAge is a toolkit to facilitate measurement of biological age for geroscience.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Aging Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Biological age; Biomarkers; CALERIE; Geroscience; Healthspan

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34725754      PMCID: PMC8602613          DOI: 10.1007/s11357-021-00480-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geroscience        ISSN: 2509-2723            Impact factor:   7.713


  31 in total

Review 1.  Healthy aging: The ultimate preventative medicine.

Authors:  Matt Kaeberlein; Peter S Rabinovitch; George M Martin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The Longitudinal Study of Aging in Human Young Adults: Knowledge Gaps and Research Agenda.

Authors:  Terrie E Moffitt; Daniel W Belsky; Andrea Danese; Richie Poulton; Avshalom Caspi
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Letter: National health insurance.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Eliminating neonatal tetanus--an attainable goal.

Authors:  R Cook; A Galazka
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates.

Authors:  Gregory Hannum; Justin Guinney; Ling Zhao; Li Zhang; Guy Hughes; SriniVas Sadda; Brandy Klotzle; Marina Bibikova; Jian-Bing Fan; Yuan Gao; Rob Deconde; Menzies Chen; Indika Rajapakse; Stephen Friend; Trey Ideker; Kang Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  The responsibilities of the state for the prevention and treatment of mental illness among prisoners.

Authors:  A F Leuchter
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 7.  Understanding the odd science of aging.

Authors:  Thomas B L Kirkwood
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  The hallmarks of aging.

Authors:  Carlos López-Otín; Maria A Blasco; Linda Partridge; Manuel Serrano; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Measuring biological aging in humans: A quest.

Authors:  Luigi Ferrucci; Marta Gonzalez-Freire; Elisa Fabbri; Eleanor Simonsick; Toshiko Tanaka; Zenobia Moore; Shabnam Salimi; Felipe Sierra; Rafael de Cabo
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 9.304

10.  Recalibrating the epigenetic clock: implications for assessing biological age in the human cortex.

Authors:  Gemma L Shireby; Jonathan P Davies; Paul T Francis; Joe Burrage; Emma M Walker; Grant W A Neilson; Aisha Dahir; Alan J Thomas; Seth Love; Rebecca G Smith; Katie Lunnon; Meena Kumari; Leonard C Schalkwyk; Kevin Morgan; Keeley Brookes; Eilis Hannon; Jonathan Mill
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Research priorities for measuring biologic age: summary and future directions from the Research Centers Collaborative Network Workshop.

Authors:  Tina E Brinkley; Jamie N Justice; Shubhashrita Basu; Scott R Bauer; Kah Poh Loh; Peter Mukli; Ted Kheng Siang Ng; Indira C Turney; Luigi Ferrucci; Steven R Cummings; Stephen B Kritchevsky
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 7.581

2.  Using blood test parameters to define biological age among older adults: association with morbidity and mortality independent of chronological age validated in two separate birth cohorts.

Authors:  Johanna Drewelies; Gizem Hueluer; Sandra Duezel; Valentin Max Vetter; Graham Pawelec; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Gert G Wagner; Ulman Lindenberger; Christina M Lill; Lars Bertram; Denis Gerstorf; Ilja Demuth
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 7.581

3.  Social mobility and biological aging among older adults in the United States.

Authors:  Gloria Huei-Jong Graf; Yalu Zhang; Benjamin W Domingue; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Meeraj Kothari; Dayoon Kwon; Peter Muennig; Daniel W Belsky
Journal:  PNAS Nexus       Date:  2022-03-29

4.  Evaluation of T-cell aging-related immune phenotypes in the context of biological aging and multimorbidity in the Health and Retirement Study.

Authors:  Ramya Ramasubramanian; Helen C S Meier; Sithara Vivek; Eric Klopack; Eileen M Crimmins; Jessica Faul; Janko Nikolich-Žugich; Bharat Thyagarajan
Journal:  Immun Ageing       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 9.701

5.  DunedinPACE, a DNA methylation biomarker of the pace of aging.

Authors:  Daniel W Belsky; Avshalom Caspi; David L Corcoran; Karen Sugden; Richie Poulton; Louise Arseneault; Andrea Baccarelli; Kartik Chamarti; Xu Gao; Eilis Hannon; Hona Lee Harrington; Renate Houts; Meeraj Kothari; Dayoon Kwon; Jonathan Mill; Joel Schwartz; Pantel Vokonas; Cuicui Wang; Benjamin S Williams; Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Testing Black-White Disparities in Biological Aging Among Older Adults in the United States: Analysis of DNA-Methylation and Blood-Chemistry Methods.

Authors:  Gloria H Graf; Christopher L Crowe; Meeraj Kothari; Dayoon Kwon; Jennifer J Manly; Indira C Turney; Linda Valeri; Daniel W Belsky
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.363

7.  Role of sleep quality in the acceleration of biological aging and its potential for preventive interaction on air pollution insults: Findings from the UK Biobank cohort.

Authors:  Xu Gao; Ninghao Huang; Xinbiao Guo; Tao Huang
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 11.005

8.  Advanced biological age is associated with improved antibody responses in older high-dose influenza vaccine recipients over four consecutive seasons.

Authors:  Chris P Verschoor; Daniel W Belsky; Melissa K Andrew; Laura Haynes; Mark Loeb; Graham Pawelec; Janet E McElhaney; George A Kuchel
Journal:  Immun Ageing       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 9.701

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.