| Literature DB >> 35614966 |
Yujie Liu1, Jing Bai1, Jianbang Kang2, Yan Song2, Donghong Yin2, Jing Wang2, Hao Li3, Jinju Duan2.
Abstract
Background: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) represents a significant threat to public health and has already drawn worldwide attention. Hence, we aim to comprehensively analyze the case condition, as well as molecular epidemiology, resistance and virulence of three CRKP isolates with new sequence types (STs).Entities:
Keywords: CRKP; carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae; molecular characteristics; new sequence types; resistance; virulence factors
Year: 2022 PMID: 35614966 PMCID: PMC9124815 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S366480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Drug Resist ISSN: 1178-6973 Impact factor: 4.177
Clinical Characteristics of the Three Strains
| No. | Sex | Age | Ward | Diagnosis | Complications | Admission Date | Isolate Date of CRKP | Length of Stay (LOS) | Discharged Date | Species | Sample | Others* | Clinical Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 53 | ICU | Spinal cord injury | Hyponatremia | 3.Nov.2020 | 18.Nov.2020 (on the 15th day) | 164d | 16.Apr.2021 | CRKP | Sputum | Sputum– a. b; P.A | Improvement |
| 2 | M | 57 | Plastic burn surgery | Lung infection | Hypoprotei-nemia | 21.Nov.2019 | 28.Nov.2019 (on the 7th day) | 56d | 16.Jan.2020 | CRKP | Sputum | Sputum—a. b | Improvement |
| 3 | F | 81 | ICU | Severe pneumonia | Diabetes | 26.Mar.2020 | 10.Apr.2020 (on the 15th day) | 21d | 16.Apr.2020 | CRKP | Sputum | Sputum– SA; HI | Remain critical |
Notes: Others*: Others means other strains except CRKP strains isolated from the patient during the hospitalization, including its sample types and bacterial species.
Abbreviations: M, Male; F, Female; CRKP, Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae; a. b, Acinetobacter baumannii; PA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; EF, Enterococcus faecium; SH, Staphylococcus haemolyticus; SA, Staphylococcus aureus; HI, Haemophilus influenzae; eco, Escherichia coli.
The Antibiotic Sensitivity Test Results of the Three Strains
| No. | CSL | IPM | MEM | LEV | ATM | SXT | AMK | TGC | COL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | >256 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 16 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ≤0.5 |
| 2 | 256 | 16 | 64 | 32 | >256 | 2 | >64 | 0.25 | ≤0.5 |
| 3 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 16 | 128 | 4 | >64 | 0.5 | ≤0.5 |
| ATCC | 0.25 | 0.25 | <0.0625 | <0.0625 | 0.25 | <0.0625 | 2 | <0.0625 | <0.0625 |
Abbreviations: CSL, Cefoperazone-Sulbactam; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; LEV, levofloxacin; ATM, aztreonam; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; AMK, amikacin; TGC, tigecycline; COL, colistin.
Figure 1Biofilm formation of these three strains.
Figure 2The results of serum resistance assay of these three strains.
Figure 3The associated genes detection by WGS. (A) The presence of resistance genes of the three strains; (B) The presence of virulence genes of the three strains; Dark parts indicate presence and light parts indicate absence.
Figure 4goeBurst- based genetic relationship of ST5365, ST5587, ST5647 CRKP and some common clone lineage CC258.