Literature DB >> 35614341

Causal factors for late presentation of retinal detachment.

Rodrigo Anguita1, Magdalene Yin Lin Ting2, Achini Makuloluwa2, David G Charteris2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35614341      PMCID: PMC9130971          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02109-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   4.456


× No keyword cloud information.
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is the most common ophthalmic emergency and is a major causes of visual loss in the United Kingdom (UK) [1]. With prompt surgery RRD can be successfully repaired with good visual outcomes in ~80–90% of all cases [2]. This is in contrast to late presentation retinal detachment, which has commonly been described in low-income countries and attributed to a lack of access to healthcare, rurality and cost [3]. Recently, we have identified that late presentation retinal detachment (LPRD) continues to occur in the UK [4]. To investigate the reasons for this late presentation we conducted a telephone survey to all patients with diagnosis of LPRD, defined as RRD with loss of central vision for 4 weeks or more, presenting between August 2018 and July 2021 at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Patients were asked three questions: 1) why was there a delay between onset of symptoms and clinic attendance? 2) Had you heard about retinal detachment before you suffered it? 3) Do you think that knowing about retinal detachment and its presenting symptoms could help people to attend earlier? In the subgroup of patients attending between March 2020 and April 2021, which was the critical period of COVID-19 lockdowns in the UK, we asked them one additional question: 4) did COVID-19 influence in some way the delay of the attendance? All telephone surveys were conducted by the same investigator (MT). We identified 79 patients—50 (63%) male and 29 (34%) female. The average age was 60 years (SD 16, range 18–99): The mean onset of central visual loss was 13 weeks (SD 16, range 4–112). Within the total cohort, we were able to contact 58 patients and all agreed to answer the survey. The results of the survey are summarised in Table 1. Overall, in the question N°1 90% of patients attributed their symptoms to no serious problem. 81% of patients had never heard about RRD and all (100%) thought that knowing about RRD and its presenting symptoms would have helped them to attend earlier, 83% of patients who answered the question N°4 declared that COVID-19 influenced the delay of their presentation.
Table 1

Telephone survey about causal factors for late presentation of retinal detachment.

QuestionsAnswers
1. Why there was a delay between onset of symptoms and clinic attendance?

• No concern as thought nothing serious (90%)

• Medical reasons (5%)

• Patients abroad, decided to wait until coming back (3%)

• Others (2%)

2. Had you heard about retinal detachment before you suffered it?

• Yes (19%)

• No (81%)

3. Do you think that knowing about retinal detachment and its presenting symptoms could help people to attend earlier?• Yes (100%)
4. Did COVID-19 influence in some way the delay of the attendance?

• Yes (83%)

• No (17%)

Telephone survey about causal factors for late presentation of retinal detachment. • No concern as thought nothing serious (90%) • Medical reasons (5%) • Patients abroad, decided to wait until coming back (3%) • Others (2%) • Yes (19%) • No (81%) • Yes (83%) • No (17%) We previously noted that LPRD does not appear to be related with socioeconomic or educational status [4]. Although cases can be treated with good anatomical results, there is a high incidence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and visual outcomes are often less favourable. In addition, there is an increase in cost to patients and healthcare systems [2, 4]. Although the UK has a comprehensive vitreoretinal service, free at the point of access the continued occurrence of LPRD and the underlying reasons for this demonstrate the need for further education of the public on the symptoms of RRD and the need for prompt assessment. Ophthalmologists and in particular vitreoretinal surgeons should play a leading role in this process.
  4 in total

1.  The epidemiology and socioeconomic associations of retinal detachment in Scotland: a two-year prospective population-based study.

Authors:  Danny Mitry; David G Charteris; David Yorston; M A Rehman Siddiqui; Harry Campbell; Anna-Louise Murphy; Brian W Fleck; Alan F Wright; Jaswinder Singh
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Late presentation of retinal detachment in India: A comparison between developing nations.

Authors:  Brijesh Takkar; Shorya Vardhan Azad; Indrish Bhatia; Raj Vardhan Azad
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.537

3.  LATE PRESENTATION OF RETINAL DETACHMENT: CLINICAL FEATURES AND SURGICAL OUTCOMES.

Authors:  Rodrigo Anguita; Janice Roth; Achini Makuloluwa; Syed Shahid; Mohamed Katta; Hagar Khalid; David G Charteris
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Resources involved in managing retinal detachment complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

Authors:  Nandesh N Patel; Catey Bunce; Riaz H Asaria; David G Charteris
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.256

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.