| Literature DB >> 35614332 |
Hsiao-Hui Tsou1,2, Shu-Chen Kuo3, Yu-Hsuan Lin4,5,6,7, Chao A Hsiung4, Hung-Yi Chiou4,8,9, Wei J Chen10,11, Shiow-Ing Wu4, Huey-Kang Sytwu3, Pau-Chung Chen12,13,14,15, Meng-Hsuan Wu4, Ya-Ting Hsu4, Hsiao-Yu Wu4, Fang-Jing Lee16, Shu-Man Shih4, Ding-Ping Liu17,18, Shan-Chwen Chang19.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic struck the world unguarded, some places outperformed others in COVID-19 containment. This longitudinal study considered a comparative evaluation of COVID-19 containment across 50 distinctly governed regions between March 2020 and November 2021. Our analysis distinguishes between a pre-vaccine phase (March-November 2020) and a vaccinating phase (December 2020-November 2021). In the first phase, we develop an indicator, termed lockdown efficiency (LE), to estimate the efficacy of measures against monthly case numbers. Nine other indicators were considered, including vaccine-related indicators in the second phase. Linear mixed models are used to explore the relationship between each government policy & hygiene education (GP&HE) indicator and each vital health & socioeconomic (VH&SE) measure. Our ranking shows that surveyed countries in Oceania and Asian outperformed countries in other regions for pandemic containment prior to vaccine development. Their success appears to be associated with non-pharmaceutical interventions, acting early, and adjusting policies as needed. After vaccines have been distributed, maintaining non-pharmacological intervention is the best way to achieve protection from variant viral strains, breakthrough infections, waning vaccine efficacy, and vaccine hesitancy limiting of herd immunity. The findings of the study provide insights into the effectiveness of emerging infectious disease containment policies worldwide.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35614332 PMCID: PMC9130690 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12853-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996