Literature DB >> 32283286

Google searches for the keywords of "wash hands" predict the speed of national spread of COVID-19 outbreak among 21 countries.

Yu-Hsuan Lin1, Chun-Hao Liu2, Yu-Chuan Chiu3.   

Abstract

This study hypothesized that national population health literacy might reflect on their keywords searching. We applied Google searches for "wash hands" and "face mask" during January 19 to February 18 as a surrogate of national population health literacy among 21 countries, and examine whether google searches for "wash hands" and "face masks" would protect from increased numbers of confirmed cases of among 21 countries We found the increased google searches for "wash hands" from January 19 to February 18, 2020, correlated with a lower spreading speed of COVID-19 from February 19 to March 10, 2020 among 21 countries (Pearson's correlation coefficient of -0.70, P < 0.001). The result highlights the importance of public awareness of hand washing in preventing COVID-19 disease spreading.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32283286      PMCID: PMC7151250          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Immun        ISSN: 0889-1591            Impact factor:   7.217


Background

On 20 January, Chinese health authorities announced the human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The number of cases of COVID-19 outside China started to rapidly increase on February 20, with Italy, South Korea and Iran reporting new infections, and the rapid spread in European countries in March (The Center for Systems Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 2020). As COVID-19 spreads around the world, the general population seek information on methods of protecting themselves. This concern and health literacy could be reflected in Google searches. Google searches for flu symptoms have been found as good indicators of influenza outbreaks, and have been applied to estimate national and regional influenza incidence (Ginsberg et al., 2009). Google search trends were also used to predict the national COVID-19 outbreak in China (Li et al., 2020), Iran (Ayyoubzadeh et al., 2020) and Taiwan (Husnayain et al., 2020). In addition to infectious diseases, Google searches have been used to reflect population mental status and behaviors such as major depression (Yang et al., 2010) and suicide (Solano et al., 2016). This study hypothesized that the search behaviors on health literacy might reflect the spreading speed among different countries. More specifically, we aimed to examine whether google searches for “wash hands” and “face masks” would protect from increased numbers of confirmed cases of COVID-19 among 21 countries.

Methods

We applied Google searches for “wash hands” and “face mask” during January 19 to February 18 as a surrogate of national population health literacy and health policy among 21 countries with differing rates of increase in COVID-19 after February 19, 2020 (no countries other than China had accumulated more than 100 cases of COVID-19 prior to February 19, 2020). We used Google Trends (Google Trend, 2020) to target two keywords “wash hands” and “face mask” among the 21 countries with differing rates of COVID-19 spread during February 19 to March 10. We confirmed the translation of these two keywords by using both the translation from Chinese and English, with back-translation on Google Translate (https://translate.google.com/), and to examine whether these keyword searches had the most increase in the latest 30 days on Google Trends (Supplement Table S1). A “Google trend” number represents the search interest relative to the highest point for the selected region and time. A value of 100 is the peak popularity of the term, whilst a value of 50 means that the term is half as popular. Considering both the intensity and duration of the increased population interest, we defined the indicator as the number of days during January 19 to February 18 with a “Google Trend” value of at least 25 from baseline (Fig. 1 ), which we have defined as search interest from December 19, 2019 to January 18, 2020 (A period prior to any widespread knowledge of the disease worldwide). We examined the temporal correlation between the indicator and the increased case numbers of COVID-19 among 21 countries from February 19 to March 10, 2020.
Fig. 1

We defined the baseline as the average of Google Trend” value (16.5) from December 19, 2019 to January 18, 2020, based on this period prior to any widespread knowledge of the disease worldwide. We defined the indicator as the number of days during January 19 to February 18 with a “Google Trend” value of at least 25 (16.5 + 25 = 41.5) from baseline. The number of days was 22 with an increased value of at least 25. Similarly, the number of days was 15 with an increased value of at least 50 in Taiwan.

We defined the baseline as the average of Google Trend” value (16.5) from December 19, 2019 to January 18, 2020, based on this period prior to any widespread knowledge of the disease worldwide. We defined the indicator as the number of days during January 19 to February 18 with a “Google Trend” value of at least 25 (16.5 + 25 = 41.5) from baseline. The number of days was 22 with an increased value of at least 25. Similarly, the number of days was 15 with an increased value of at least 50 in Taiwan.

Results

The number of days with an increased value of at least 25 from baseline search for “wash hands” from January 19 to February 18, 2020, was temporally negatively associated to the logarithmic increased cases from February 19 to March 10, 2020 with the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) of −0.70, P < 0.001 (Fig. 2 ). In addition, the number of days of a value of at least 15 to 50 value in increased search for “wash hands” were all significantly negatively correlated to the increased case numbers of COVID-19 (r = -0.46, P = 0.038 to −0.70, P < 0.001). The findings show that increased google searches for “wash hands” (defined either as increased at least 25 from baseline search value or at least 15–50 baseline search value, Supplement Table S2) from January 19 to February 18, 2020, correlated with a lower spreading speed of COVID-19 from February 19 to March 10, 2020. Whereas, increased search interest in “face mask” had no significant correlation with changes in COVID-19 cases (r = −0.22 to −0.43, P > 0.05, Table S2).
Fig. 2

The number of days with a “Google Trend” value of >25 for “wash hands” during January 19 to February 18 had a temporally negatively association to the logarithmic increased COVID-19 cases among 21 countries during February 18 to March 10.

The number of days with a “Google Trend” value of >25 for “wash hands” during January 19 to February 18 had a temporally negatively association to the logarithmic increased COVID-19 cases among 21 countries during February 18 to March 10.

Discussion

Google searches for “face mask” reached an all-time high since February 2020. Another keyword “wash hands”, which is more important and relevant to COVID-19 spread, also increased but not in the magnitude of increase of the search for “face mask”. Google search for “wash hands” indicated not only the promotion of hand hygiene awareness but might also reflect the extent that people proactively engaged in hand washing. The related queries for “wash hands” on Google Trends among the 21 countries included hand sanitizer brands, hand washing steps, and information regarding COVID-19. The increased internet search queries indicated the more people proactively engaged in hand hygiene, which may have had an effect on reducing the speed of COVID-19 outbreak during the following three weeks. Since approximately 19% of the world population washes hands with soap after contact with excreta (Freeman et al., 2014), and environmental contamination by patients with COVID-19 through respiratory droplets and fecal shedding (Ong et al., 2020) suggests the need for strict adherence to hand hygiene. The significant increase in searches for “face mask” revealed general population’s anxieties towards COVID-19 and the possible short supply of face masks during periods of a COVID-19 pandemic, despite the evidence that face masks worn by healthy individuals are still controversial in infection prevention (Chan and Yuen, 2020). Although current available research supports the possibility that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) could be spreads via bioaerosols generated directly by patients’ exhalation, face masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment (Leung et al., 2020). These findings were consistent with our results that hand hygiene is a more effective strategy than wearing a face mask. In addition, the Google searches for “face mask” and “wash hands” would correspond to different implications. The increased search for “face mask” might indicate the increased numbers of people wearing face masks, but also might result from the short supply of face masks in the corresponding country, which would indicate few people were wearing face masks. However, the increased google searches for “wash hands” would simply indicate people engaged more in hand hygiene. In summary, our findings support the experts’ suggestion that even if wearing a face mask is indicated, it is still important to wash hands with soap and water for at least 20 s prior to putting on the face mask (Desai et al., 2020), and repeating hand hygiene after touching the outer surface of masks (Bae et al., 2020). We expect that the increase of google searches for “wash hands” provide real-time indicators for transmission-reduction policies and population health literacy in the early stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. Moving forward it is noteworthy to examine whether the promotion of population’s awareness of hand washing will still provide the greatest benefit to mitigate the pandemic.

Role of the funding source

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author contributions

YHL designed the study. YHL and CHL conducted the study and analyzed the data. YHL and YCC drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting or revising the article, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hygiene and health: systematic review of handwashing practices worldwide and update of health effects.

Authors:  Matthew C Freeman; Meredith E Stocks; Oliver Cumming; Aurelie Jeandron; Julian P T Higgins; Jennyfer Wolf; Annette Prüss-Ustün; Sophie Bonjour; Paul R Hunter; Lorna Fewtrell; Valerie Curtis
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data.

Authors:  Jeremy Ginsberg; Matthew H Mohebbi; Rajan S Patel; Lynnette Brammer; Mark S Smolinski; Larry Brilliant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

  2 in total
  44 in total

1.  Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment: How plastic contamination from disposable surgical masks affect early development of plants.

Authors:  Enikő Mészáros; Attila Bodor; Ádám Szierer; Etelka Kovács; Katalin Perei; Csaba Tölgyesi; Zoltán Bátori; Gábor Feigl
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 14.224

2.  Utilizing Internet Search Volume to Monitor Stages of Change in Vaccine Hesitancy During the COVID-19 Outbreaks.

Authors:  Yu-Tung Lan; Shiow-Ing Wu; Yu-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Impact of social distancing on early SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the United States.

Authors:  Jessica N Sanchez; Gabriel A Reyes; Beatriz Martínez-López; Christine K Johnson
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.954

4.  Online behavioural patterns for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  M D Walker; M Sulyok
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.451

5.  Factors Associated With Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Measures Among Saudi Arabians.

Authors:  Abdullah S Alshammari; Hotoon Alshammari; Sulaiman Alshammari
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-22

6.  Beyond the virus: a first look at coronavirus-themed Android malware.

Authors:  Liu Wang; Ren He; Haoyu Wang; Pengcheng Xia; Yuanchun Li; Lei Wu; Yajin Zhou; Xiapu Luo; Yulei Sui; Yao Guo; Guoai Xu
Journal:  Empir Softw Eng       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.522

7.  Engagement With COVID-19 Public Health Measures in the United States: A Cross-sectional Social Media Analysis from June to November 2020.

Authors:  Daisy Massey; Chenxi Huang; Yuan Lu; Alina Cohen; Yahel Oren; Tali Moed; Pini Matzner; Shiwani Mahajan; César Caraballo; Navin Kumar; Yuchen Xue; Qinglan Ding; Rachel Dreyer; Brita Roy; Harlan Krumholz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  The rise of infodemiology and infoveillance during COVID-19 crisis.

Authors:  Steffen Springer; Michael Zieger; Artur Strzelecki
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2021-07-03

9.  Changes in handwashing and hygiene product usage patterns in Korea before and after the outbreak of COVID-19.

Authors:  KeunOh Choi; Seunghye Sim; Junyeong Choi; Choa Park; Yoonhee Uhm; Eunkyung Lim; Augustine Yonghwi Kim; Seong Joon Yoo; YoungJoo Lee
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 5.893

10.  Applying and Understanding an Advanced, Novel Deep Learning Approach: A Covid 19, Text Based, Emotions Analysis Study.

Authors:  Jyoti Choudrie; Shruti Patil; Ketan Kotecha; Nikhil Matta; Ilias Pappas
Journal:  Inf Syst Front       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 6.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.