Ali S Farooqi1, Austin J Borja1, Donald K E D Detchou1, Gregory Glauser1, Krista Strouz2,3, Scott D McClintock3, Neil R Malhotra4. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. 2. McKenna EpiLog Fellowship in Population Health at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. 3. The West Chester Statistical Institute and Department of Mathematics, West Chester University, West Chester, USA. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA neil.malhotra@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There remains a paucity of literature on the impact of overlap on neurosurgical patient outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to correlate increasing duration of surgical overlap with short-term patient outcomes following lumbar fusion. METHODS: The present study retrospectively analyzed 1302 adult patients undergoing overlapping, single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion within a single, multicenter, academic health system. Recorded outcomes included 30-day emergency department visits, readmission, reoperation, mortality, overall morbidity, and overall morbidity/surgical complications. The amount of overlap was calculated as a percentage of total overlap time. Comparison was made between patients with the most (top 10%) and least (bottom 40%) amount of overlap. Patients were then exact matched on key demographic factors but not by the attending surgeons. Subsequently, patients were exact matched by both demographic data and the attending surgeons. Univariate analysis was first carried out prior to matching and then on both the demographic-matched and surgeon-matched cohorts. Significance for all analyses was set at a P value of <0.05. RESULTS: Within the whole population, increasing duration of overlap was not correlated with any short-term outcome (P = 0.41-0.91). After exact matching, patients with the most and least durations of overlap did not have significant differences with respect to any short-term outcomes (P = 0.34-1.00). CONCLUSION: Increased amount of overlap is not associated with adverse short-term outcomes for single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present results suggest that increasing the duration of overlap during lumbar fusion surgery does not lead to inferior outcomes. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
BACKGROUND: There remains a paucity of literature on the impact of overlap on neurosurgical patient outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to correlate increasing duration of surgical overlap with short-term patient outcomes following lumbar fusion. METHODS: The present study retrospectively analyzed 1302 adult patients undergoing overlapping, single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion within a single, multicenter, academic health system. Recorded outcomes included 30-day emergency department visits, readmission, reoperation, mortality, overall morbidity, and overall morbidity/surgical complications. The amount of overlap was calculated as a percentage of total overlap time. Comparison was made between patients with the most (top 10%) and least (bottom 40%) amount of overlap. Patients were then exact matched on key demographic factors but not by the attending surgeons. Subsequently, patients were exact matched by both demographic data and the attending surgeons. Univariate analysis was first carried out prior to matching and then on both the demographic-matched and surgeon-matched cohorts. Significance for all analyses was set at a P value of <0.05. RESULTS: Within the whole population, increasing duration of overlap was not correlated with any short-term outcome (P = 0.41-0.91). After exact matching, patients with the most and least durations of overlap did not have significant differences with respect to any short-term outcomes (P = 0.34-1.00). CONCLUSION: Increased amount of overlap is not associated with adverse short-term outcomes for single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present results suggest that increasing the duration of overlap during lumbar fusion surgery does not lead to inferior outcomes. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Authors: Alan L Zhang; David C Sing; Debbie Y Dang; C Benjamin Ma; Dennis Black; Thomas P Vail; Brian T Feeley Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Jefferson R Wilson; Lindsay A Tetreault; Gregory Schroeder; James S Harrop; Srinivas Prasad; Alex Vaccaro; Christopher Kepler; Ashwini Sharan; Michael G Fehlings Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Corinna C Zygourakis; Malla Keefe; Janelle Lee; Julio Barba; Michael W McDermott; Praveen V Mummaneni; Michael T Lawton Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: John Y S Kim; Nima Khavanin; Aksharananda Rambachan; Robert J McCarthy; Alexei S Mlodinow; Gildasio S De Oliveria; M Christine Stock; Madeleine J Gust; David M Mahvi Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Brent A Ponce; Bradley W Wills; Parke W Hudson; Samuel R Huntley; Austin C Starnes; Shawna L Watson; Loring W Rue; Jorge L Perez; Gerald McGwin Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michael Karsy; Christian A Bowers; Jonathan Scoville; Bornali Kundu; Mohammed A Azab; J Michael Gee; Jian Guan; William T Couldwell Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 4.654