Literature DB >> 25472485

Surgical duration and risk of venous thromboembolism.

John Y S Kim1, Nima Khavanin1, Aksharananda Rambachan1, Robert J McCarthy2, Alexei S Mlodinow1, Gildasio S De Oliveria2, M Christine Stock2, Madeleine J Gust1, David M Mahvi1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: There is a paucity of data assessing the effect of increased surgical duration on the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between surgical duration and the incidence of VTE. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort of 1,432,855 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia at 315 US hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2005 to 2011. EXPOSURE: Duration of surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and VTE within 30 days of the index operation. Surgical duration was standardized across Current Procedural Terminology codes using a z score. Outcomes were compared across quintiles of the z score. Multiple logistic regression models were developed to examine the association while adjusting for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and comorbidities.
RESULTS: The overall VTE rate was 0.96% (n = 13,809); the rates of DVT and PE were 0.71% (n = 10,198) and 0.33% (n = 4772), respectively. The association between surgical duration and VTE increased in a stepwise fashion. Compared with a procedure of average duration, patients undergoing the longest procedures experienced a 1.27-fold (95% CI, 1.21-1.34; adjusted risk difference [ARD], 0.23%) increase in the odds of developing a VTE; the shortest procedures demonstrated an odds ratio of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.88; ARD, -0.12%). The robustness of these results was substantiated with several sensitivity analyses attempting to minimize the effect of outliers, concurrent complications, procedural differences, and unmeasured confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients undergoing surgery, an increase in surgical duration was directly associated with an increase in the risk for VTE. These findings may help inform preoperative and postoperative decision making related to surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25472485     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  50 in total

1.  Minimally invasive resection of intracranial lesions using tubular retractors: a large, multi-surgeon, multi-institutional series.

Authors:  Daniel G Eichberg; Long Di; Ashish H Shah; Evan M Luther; Christina Jackson; Lina Marenco-Hillembrand; Kaisorn L Chaichana; Michael E Ivan; Robert M Starke; Ricardo J Komotar
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  High Risk of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism After Surgery for Spine Metastatic Bone Lesions: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Olivier Q Groot; Paul T Ogink; Nuno Rei Paulino Pereira; Marco L Ferrone; Mitchell B Harris; Santiago A Lozano-Calderon; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Pullout Strength After Multiple Reinsertions in Radial Bone Fixation.

Authors:  Alfonso Mejia; Giovanni Solitro; Elena Gonzalez; Amit Parekh; Mark Gonzalez; Farid Amirouche
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-09-06

4.  Do All Abdominal Neuroendocrine Tumors Require Extended Postoperative VTE Prophylaxis? A NSQIP Analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Skertich; Justin Gerard; Jennifer Poirier; Martin Hertl; Sam G Pappas; Erik Schadde; Xavier M Keutgen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Does "Two is Better Than One" Apply to Surgeons? Comparing Single-Surgeon Versus Co-surgeon Bilateral Mastectomies.

Authors:  Melissa Anne Mallory; Katya Losk; Kristen Camuso; Stephanie Caterson; Suniti Nimbkar; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Bilateral mastectomies: can a co-surgeon technique offer improvements over the single-surgeon method?

Authors:  Melissa Anne Mallory; Constantine Tarabanis; Eric Schneider; Suniti Nimbkar; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  The role of fat grafting in prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Halley Darrach; Franca Kraenzlin; Nima Khavanin; Karan Chopra; Justin M Sacks
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

8.  Head injury in the elderly - an overview for the physician.

Authors:  William Beedham; George Peck; Simon E Richardson; Kevin Tsang; Michael Fertleman; David Jh Shipway
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.659

9.  Surgical trends and patient factors associated with the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse from a national sample.

Authors:  Emily A Slopnick; Andrey Petrikovets; David Sheyn; Simon P Kim; Carvell T Nguyen; Adonis K Hijaz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Resident Participation is Not Associated With Worse Outcomes After TKA.

Authors:  Mike H Bao; Benjamin J Keeney; Wayne E Moschetti; Nicholas G Paddock; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.