Literature DB >> 35610386

Adding liver R2* quantification to proton density fat fraction MRI of vertebral bone marrow improves the prediction of osteoporosis.

Feng Lu1, Yan-Jun Zhao1, Jian-Ming Ni1, Yu Jiang2, Fang-Ming Chen1, Zhong-Juan Wang3, Zhui-Yang Zhang4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the predictive value of the combination of bone marrow (BM) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and liver R2* for osteopenia and osteoporosis and the additional role of liver R2*.
METHODS: A total of 107 healthy women were included between June 2019 and January 2021. Each participant underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and chemical shift-encoded 3.0-T MRI. PDFF measurements were performed for each lumbar vertebral body, and R2* measurements were performed in liver segments. Agreement among measurements was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to select optimised cut-offs for BM PDFF and liver R2*. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed. The C statistic and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) were adopted to explore the incremental predictive ability of liver R2*.
RESULTS: Bone mass decreased in 42 cases (39.3%) and nonbone mass decreased in 65 cases (60.7%). There were significant differences among the age groups, menopausal status groups, PDFF > 45.0% groups, and R2* > 67.7 groups. Each measurement had good reproducibility. The odds ratios (95% CIs) were 4.05 (1.22-13.43) for PDFF and 4.34 (1.41-13.35) for R2*. The C statistic (95% CI) without R2* was 0.888 (0.827-0.950), and with R2* was 0.900 (0.841-0.960). The NRI resulting from the combination of PDFF and R2* was 75.6% (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The predictive improvement over the use of BM PDFF and other traditional risk factors demonstrates the potential of liver R2* as a biomarker for osteopenia and osteoporosis in healthy women. KEY POINTS: • Liver R2* is a biomarker for the assessment of osteopenia and osteoporosis. • Liver R2* improved the ability to predict osteopenia and osteoporosis. • The intra- and interobserver measurements showed high agreement.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone marrow; Iron overload; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35610386     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08861-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  43 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of marrow adiposity and its implications for skeletal health.

Authors:  Annegreet G Veldhuis-Vlug; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 8.694

2.  A comparative overview of metatarsal stress fractures in premenopausal and postmenopausal women: our single-centre experience with eighty-one patients.

Authors:  Olcay Guler; Mehmet Halis Cerci
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Reconstructing the 3D shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Tristan Whitmarsh; Ludovic Humbert; Mathieu De Craene; Luis M Del Rio Barquero; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Visceral Adipose Tissue Is Associated With Bone Microarchitecture in the Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Ching-Ti Liu; Kerry E Broe; Yanhua Zhou; Steven K Boyd; L Adrienne Cupples; Marian T Hannan; Elise Lim; Robert R McLean; Elizabeth J Samelson; Mary L Bouxsein; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Cross-sectional study of osteopenia with quantitative MR imaging and bone densitometry.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; J A Hopkins; S N Hwang; H K Song; P J Snyder; J G Haddad
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  James F Griffith; David K W Yeung; Gregory E Antonio; Francis K H Lee; Athena W L Hong; Samuel Y S Wong; Edith M C Lau; Ping Chung Leung
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Bone marrow adipose tissue is an endocrine organ that contributes to increased circulating adiponectin during caloric restriction.

Authors:  William P Cawthorn; Erica L Scheller; Brian S Learman; Sebastian D Parlee; Becky R Simon; Hiroyuki Mori; Xiaomin Ning; Adam J Bree; Benjamin Schell; David T Broome; Sandra S Soliman; Jenifer L DelProposto; Carey N Lumeng; Aditi Mitra; Sandeep V Pandit; Katherine A Gallagher; Joshua D Miller; Venkatesh Krishnan; Susanta K Hui; Miriam A Bredella; Pouneh K Fazeli; Anne Klibanski; Mark C Horowitz; Clifford J Rosen; Ormond A MacDougald
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 27.287

8.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Ya-Ting Chen; Thomas A Abbott; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Paul D Miller; Lois E Wehren; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

Review 9.  What's the matter with MAT? Marrow adipose tissue, metabolism, and skeletal health.

Authors:  Erica L Scheller; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 10.  Prevalence of osteoporosis in China: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Zhanzhan Li; Yihe Hu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.