| Literature DB >> 35607310 |
Jianyong Peng1, Xinhao Zhang2,3,4, Lina Wang2, Fang Zhu2, Nana Zhou2, Yansong Zuo5, Tao Zhou5, Yuan Gao6.
Abstract
Heart disease is a very common high-incidence disease. Due to the wide variety of pathology of heart disease, how to improve the medical diagnosis of heart disease and carry out earlier intervention and treatment is a problem that needs to be solved urgently. The paper adds the decision tree algorithm and its comparison and proposes an optimized classification algorithm Co-SVM. Based on the establishment of a heart disease diagnosis classifier based on data mining algorithms, it is aimed at exploring which of these four algorithms is more suitable for heart disease diagnosis problems and optimizing them. A brief description of the cause, influencing factors, and acquired data of heart disease can be seen from the accuracy and scientificity of the data, which further enhances the authenticity and reliability of the clinical diagnosis model of heart disease. At the same time, the ultrasound diagnosis technology of heart disease is introduced, and the important role of ultrasound diagnosis technology in the medical diagnosis of heart disease is discussed. This thesis uses the heart disease clinical data set to establish a heart disease diagnosis classifier based on the decision tree algorithm, neural network algorithm, support vector machine algorithm, and Co-SVM algorithm. Through experimental comparison and analysis, the optimal classification is selected according to the obtained results. The algorithm is Co-SVM algorithm. The experimental results show that the proposed Co-SVM algorithm has a higher accuracy rate than the other three classic algorithms, and the effectiveness of the Co-SVM algorithm is verified by the evaluation results of multiple algorithms. By applying the Co-SVM algorithm in the medical diagnosis system, it is helpful to assist doctors in making more accurate and precise diagnosis of the condition.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35607310 PMCID: PMC9124123 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7262010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Figure 1National heart health index.
Figure 2Model.
Figure 3The accuracy of the four algorithms.
Figure 4The recall rate of the four algorithms.
Figure 5ROC curve comparison chart.
Figure 6The errors of the four algorithms.
Figure 7The time of the four algorithms.