Camilla Aakjær Andersen1, Timothy C Guetterman2, Michael D Fetters2, John Brodersen3,4, Annette Sofie Davidsen3, Ole Graumann5, Martin Bach Jensen6. 1. Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark caakjaer@dcm.aau.dk. 2. Mixed Methods Program and Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Primary Health Care Research Unit, Region Zealand, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Department of Radiology, Radiological Research and Innovation Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 6. Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Researchers aimed to describe general practitioners' understanding of appropriate ultrasound use, to record actual scanning practices of early adopters in general practice, and to identify differences between attitudes and actual practice via a mixed methods analysis. METHODS: This study was part of a larger multistage mixed methods research framework exploring the use of ultrasound in general practice in Denmark. We used an exploratory sequential approach in the data collection with initial qualitative findings from an interview study applied to building a quantitative questionnaire utilized in a cohort study. In addition, we merged the qualitative and quantitative data using joint display analysis to compare and contrast the results from the 2 stages of the study. RESULTS: In the interviews, general practitioners described appropriate ultrasound use as point-of-care examinations with a clear purpose and limited to predefined specific conditions within delimited anatomic areas. They stated that general practitioners should receive formalized ultrasound training and be skilled in the examinations they perform. In the cohort study, general practitioners performed ultrasound examinations of anatomic areas with or without a defined clinical suspicion. Some performed ultrasound examinations for which they had no previous training or skills. CONCLUSIONS: We found a difference between the ideas about the appropriate uses for ultrasound in general practice and the actual use by early adopters in clinical practice. Our findings suggest a need for evidence-based guidelines to support general practitioners in choosing which examinations to perform and strategies for developing and maintaining scanning competency.
PURPOSE: Researchers aimed to describe general practitioners' understanding of appropriate ultrasound use, to record actual scanning practices of early adopters in general practice, and to identify differences between attitudes and actual practice via a mixed methods analysis. METHODS: This study was part of a larger multistage mixed methods research framework exploring the use of ultrasound in general practice in Denmark. We used an exploratory sequential approach in the data collection with initial qualitative findings from an interview study applied to building a quantitative questionnaire utilized in a cohort study. In addition, we merged the qualitative and quantitative data using joint display analysis to compare and contrast the results from the 2 stages of the study. RESULTS: In the interviews, general practitioners described appropriate ultrasound use as point-of-care examinations with a clear purpose and limited to predefined specific conditions within delimited anatomic areas. They stated that general practitioners should receive formalized ultrasound training and be skilled in the examinations they perform. In the cohort study, general practitioners performed ultrasound examinations of anatomic areas with or without a defined clinical suspicion. Some performed ultrasound examinations for which they had no previous training or skills. CONCLUSIONS: We found a difference between the ideas about the appropriate uses for ultrasound in general practice and the actual use by early adopters in clinical practice. Our findings suggest a need for evidence-based guidelines to support general practitioners in choosing which examinations to perform and strategies for developing and maintaining scanning competency.
Authors: Giovanni Volpicelli; Mahmoud Elbarbary; Michael Blaivas; Daniel A Lichtenstein; Gebhard Mathis; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Lawrence Melniker; Luna Gargani; Vicki E Noble; Gabriele Via; Anthony Dean; James W Tsung; Gino Soldati; Roberto Copetti; Belaid Bouhemad; Angelika Reissig; Eustachio Agricola; Jean-Jacques Rouby; Charlotte Arbelot; Andrew Liteplo; Ashot Sargsyan; Fernando Silva; Richard Hoppmann; Raoul Breitkreutz; Armin Seibel; Luca Neri; Enrico Storti; Tomislav Petrovic Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Niels Chavannes; Tjard Schermer; Reinier Akkermans; J E Jacobs; Gabrielle van de Graaf; Ralf Bollen; Onno van Schayck; Ben Bottema Journal: Respir Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: J L Brozek; E A Akl; P Alonso-Coello; D Lang; R Jaeschke; J W Williams; B Phillips; M Lelgemann; A Lethaby; J Bousquet; G H Guyatt; H J Schünemann Journal: Allergy Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: Camilla Aakjær Andersen; Sinead Holden; Jonathan Vela; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Martin Bach Jensen Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Gabriele Via; Arif Hussain; Mike Wells; Robert Reardon; Mahmoud ElBarbary; Vicki E Noble; James W Tsung; Aleksandar N Neskovic; Susanna Price; Achikam Oren-Grinberg; Andrew Liteplo; Ricardo Cordioli; Nitha Naqvi; Philippe Rola; Jan Poelaert; Tatjana Golob Guliĉ; Erik Sloth; Arthur Labovitz; Bruce Kimura; Raoul Breitkreutz; Navroz Masani; Justin Bowra; Daniel Talmor; Fabio Guarracino; Adrian Goudie; Wang Xiaoting; Rajesh Chawla; Maurizio Galderisi; Micheal Blaivas; Tomislav Petrovic; Enrico Storti; Luca Neri; Lawrence Melniker Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Christoph F Dietrich; Adrian Goudie; Liliana Chiorean; Xin Wu Cui; Odd Helge Gilja; Yi Dong; Jacques S Abramowicz; Sudhir Vinayak; Susan Campbell Westerway; Christian Pállson Nolsøe; Yi-Hong Chou; Michael Blaivas Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Hiske van Ravesteijn; Inge van Dijk; David Darmon; Floris van de Laar; Peter Lucassen; Tim Olde Hartman; Chris van Weel; Anne Speckens Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2011-03-06