Literature DB >> 35606122

General Practitioners' Perspectives on Appropriate Use of Ultrasonography in Primary Care in Denmark: A Multistage Mixed Methods Study.

Camilla Aakjær Andersen1, Timothy C Guetterman2, Michael D Fetters2, John Brodersen3,4, Annette Sofie Davidsen3, Ole Graumann5, Martin Bach Jensen6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Researchers aimed to describe general practitioners' understanding of appropriate ultrasound use, to record actual scanning practices of early adopters in general practice, and to identify differences between attitudes and actual practice via a mixed methods analysis.
METHODS: This study was part of a larger multistage mixed methods research framework exploring the use of ultrasound in general practice in Denmark. We used an exploratory sequential approach in the data collection with initial qualitative findings from an interview study applied to building a quantitative questionnaire utilized in a cohort study. In addition, we merged the qualitative and quantitative data using joint display analysis to compare and contrast the results from the 2 stages of the study.
RESULTS: In the interviews, general practitioners described appropriate ultrasound use as point-of-care examinations with a clear purpose and limited to predefined specific conditions within delimited anatomic areas. They stated that general practitioners should receive formalized ultrasound training and be skilled in the examinations they perform. In the cohort study, general practitioners performed ultrasound examinations of anatomic areas with or without a defined clinical suspicion. Some performed ultrasound examinations for which they had no previous training or skills.
CONCLUSIONS: We found a difference between the ideas about the appropriate uses for ultrasound in general practice and the actual use by early adopters in clinical practice. Our findings suggest a need for evidence-based guidelines to support general practitioners in choosing which examinations to perform and strategies for developing and maintaining scanning competency.
© 2022 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  family practice; general practice; point-of-care systems; primary health care; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35606122      PMCID: PMC9199035          DOI: 10.1370/afm.2795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.707


  34 in total

Review 1.  International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound.

Authors:  Giovanni Volpicelli; Mahmoud Elbarbary; Michael Blaivas; Daniel A Lichtenstein; Gebhard Mathis; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Lawrence Melniker; Luna Gargani; Vicki E Noble; Gabriele Via; Anthony Dean; James W Tsung; Gino Soldati; Roberto Copetti; Belaid Bouhemad; Angelika Reissig; Eustachio Agricola; Jean-Jacques Rouby; Charlotte Arbelot; Andrew Liteplo; Ashot Sargsyan; Fernando Silva; Richard Hoppmann; Raoul Breitkreutz; Armin Seibel; Luca Neri; Enrico Storti; Tomislav Petrovic
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Impact of spirometry on GPs' diagnostic differentiation and decision-making.

Authors:  Niels Chavannes; Tjard Schermer; Reinier Akkermans; J E Jacobs; Gabrielle van de Graaf; Ralf Bollen; Onno van Schayck; Ben Bottema
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.415

Review 3.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.

Authors:  J L Brozek; E A Akl; P Alonso-Coello; D Lang; R Jaeschke; J W Williams; B Phillips; M Lelgemann; A Lethaby; J Bousquet; G H Guyatt; H J Schünemann
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 13.146

4.  Visual research in clinical education.

Authors:  Jeff Bezemer
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 5.  Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Camilla Aakjær Andersen; Sinead Holden; Jonathan Vela; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Martin Bach Jensen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Kirsti Malterud
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 7.  International evidence-based recommendations for focused cardiac ultrasound.

Authors:  Gabriele Via; Arif Hussain; Mike Wells; Robert Reardon; Mahmoud ElBarbary; Vicki E Noble; James W Tsung; Aleksandar N Neskovic; Susanna Price; Achikam Oren-Grinberg; Andrew Liteplo; Ricardo Cordioli; Nitha Naqvi; Philippe Rola; Jan Poelaert; Tatjana Golob Guliĉ; Erik Sloth; Arthur Labovitz; Bruce Kimura; Raoul Breitkreutz; Navroz Masani; Justin Bowra; Daniel Talmor; Fabio Guarracino; Adrian Goudie; Wang Xiaoting; Rajesh Chawla; Maurizio Galderisi; Micheal Blaivas; Tomislav Petrovic; Enrico Storti; Luca Neri; Lawrence Melniker
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 8.  Point of Care Ultrasound: A WFUMB Position Paper.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Adrian Goudie; Liliana Chiorean; Xin Wu Cui; Odd Helge Gilja; Yi Dong; Jacques S Abramowicz; Sudhir Vinayak; Susan Campbell Westerway; Christian Pállson Nolsøe; Yi-Hong Chou; Michael Blaivas
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 9.  The reassuring value of diagnostic tests: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hiske van Ravesteijn; Inge van Dijk; David Darmon; Floris van de Laar; Peter Lucassen; Tim Olde Hartman; Chris van Weel; Anne Speckens
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-03-06

10.  Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study.

Authors:  L M E Wagenvoort; R T A Willemsen; K T S Konings; H E J H Stoffers
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.