Literature DB >> 19210357

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.

J L Brozek1, E A Akl, P Alonso-Coello, D Lang, R Jaeschke, J W Williams, B Phillips, M Lelgemann, A Lethaby, J Bousquet, G H Guyatt, H J Schünemann.   

Abstract

The GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach provides guidance to grading the quality of underlying evidence and the strength of recommendations in health care. The GRADE system's conceptual underpinnings allow for a detailed stepwise process that defines what role the quality of the available evidence plays in the development of health care recommendations. The merit of GRADE is not that it eliminates judgments or disagreements about evidence and recommendations, but rather that it makes them transparent. This first article in a three-part series describes the GRADE framework in relation to grading the quality of evidence about interventions based on examples from the field of allergy and asthma. In the GRADE system, the quality of evidence reflects the extent to which a guideline panel's confidence in an estimate of the effect is adequate to support a particular recommendation. The system classifies quality of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low according to factors that include the study methodology, consistency and precision of the results, and directness of the evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19210357     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  150 in total

Review 1.  Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  D Howell; T F Hack; T K Oliver; T Chulak; S Mayo; M Aubin; M Chasen; C C Earle; A J Friedman; E Green; G W Jones; J M Jones; M Parkinson; N Payeur; C M Sabiston; S Sinclair
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Diagnosis and management of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  David Liu; Erica Peterson; James Dooner; Mark Baerlocher; Leslie Zypchen; Joel Gagnon; Michael Delorme; Chad Kim Sing; Jason Wong; Randolph Guzman; Gavin Greenfield; Otto Moodley; Paul Yenson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Recommendations on screening for high blood pressure in Canadian adults.

Authors:  Patrice Lindsay; Sarah Connor Gorber; Michel Joffres; Richard Birtwhistle; Donald McKay; Lyne Cloutier
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Cochrane in CORR®: Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Nathan Evaniew; Kim Madden; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Josephine Ho; Constadina Panagiotopoulos; Brian McCrindle; Silviu Grisaru; Tamara Pringsheim
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Cochrane in CORR®: Viscosupplementation for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Nathan Evaniew; Nicole Simunovic; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Manual examination in the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Paul D Howard; William Behrns; Melanie Di Martino; Amanda DiMambro; Kristin McIntyre; Catherine Shurer
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-09

Review 8.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Management recommendations for metabolic complications associated with second generation antipsychotic use in children and youth.

Authors:  Josephine Ho; Constadina Panagiotopoulos; Brian McCrindle; Silviu Grisaru; Tamara Pringsheim
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-08

Review 10.  Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christina L Goldstein; Kevin Macwan; Kala Sundararajan; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.