Literature DB >> 35604351

Neural Reinstatement of Overlapping Memories in Young and Older Adults.

Kyoungeun Lee1, Soroush Mirjalili1, Ayesha Quadri1, Brittany Corbett1, Audrey Duarte1.   

Abstract

When we update our episodic memories with new information, mnemonic competition between old and new memories may result because of the presence of shared features. Behavioral studies suggest that this competition can lead to proactive interference, resulting in unsuccessful memory updating, particularly for older adults. It is difficult with behavioral data alone to measure the reactivation of old, overlapping memories during retrieval and its impact on memory for new memories. Here, we applied encoding-retrieval representational similarity (ERS) analysis to EEG data to estimate event-specific encoding-related neural reinstatement of old associations during the retrieval of new ones and its impact on memory for new associations in young and older adults. Our results showed that older adults' new associative memory performance was more negatively impacted by proactive interference from old memories than that of young adults. In both age groups, ERS for old associative memories was greater for trials for which new associative memories were forgotten than remembered. In contrast, ERS for new associative memories was greater when they were remembered than forgotten. In addition, older adults showed relatively attenuated target (i.e., new associates) and lure (i.e., old associates) ERS effects compared to younger adults. Collectively, these results suggest that the neural reinstatement of interfering memories during retrieval contributes to proactive interference across age, whereas overall attenuated ERS effect in older adults might reflect their reduced memory fidelity.
© 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35604351      PMCID: PMC9460962          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.420


  132 in total

Review 1.  EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis.

Authors:  W Klimesch
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1999-04

2.  Assessing the age-related effects of proactive interference on working memory tasks using the Rasch model.

Authors:  Ryan P Bowles; Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-09

3.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

4.  Age differences in proactive interference, working memory, and abstract reasoning.

Authors:  Lisa Emery; Sandra Hale; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-09

5.  The effects of aging on material-independent and material-dependent neural correlates of contextual binding.

Authors:  Michael R Dulas; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Predicting memory performance under conditions of proactive interference: immediate and delayed judgments of learning.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

7.  Theta oscillations mediate interaction between prefrontal cortex and medial temporal lobe in human memory.

Authors:  Kristopher L Anderson; Rajasimhan Rajagovindan; Georges A Ghacibeh; Kimford J Meador; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Terrence Sejnowski; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Age Differences In Retrieval-Related Reinstatement Reflect Age-Related Dedifferentiation At Encoding.

Authors:  Paul F Hill; Danielle R King; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  How Proactive Interference during New Associative Learning Impacts General and Specific Memory in Young and Old.

Authors:  Brittany Corbett; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.420

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.