Paul Iacomi1,2, Bin Zheng2,3, Simon Krause4, Stefan Kaskel4, Guillaume Maurin2, Philip L Llewellyn1. 1. Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, MADIREL UMR 7246, 13397 Marseille, France. 2. Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, ICGM - UMR 5253, Université Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, 34095 Montpellier, Cedex 05, France. 3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Yanta Road No. 58, 710054 Xi'an, PR China. 4. Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, Bergstrasse 66, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Abstract
In this study adsorption microcalorimetry is employed to monitor the adsorption of four probes (argon, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon monoxide) on a highly flexible mesoporous metal-organic framework (DUT-49, DUT = Dresden University of Technology), precisely measuring the differential enthalpy of adsorption alongside high-resolution isotherms. This experimental approach combined with force field Monte Carlo simulations reveals distinct pore filling adsorption behaviors for the selected probes, with argon and oxygen showing abrupt adsorption in the open pore form of DUT-49, in contrast with the gradual filling for nitrogen and carbon monoxide. A complex structural transition behavior of DUT-49 observed upon nitrogen adsorption is elucidated through an isotherm deconvolution in order to quantify the fractions of the open pore, contracted pore, and intermediate pore forms that coexist at a given gas pressure. Finally, the heat flow measured during the guest-induced structural contraction of DUT-49 allowed an exploration of complex open-contracted pore transition energetics, leading to a first assessment of the energy required to induce this spectacular structural change.
In this study adsorption microcalorimetry is employed to monitor the adsorption of four probes (argon, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon monoxide) on a highly flexible mesoporous metal-organic framework (DUT-49, DUT = Dresden University of Technology), precisely measuring the differential enthalpy of adsorption alongside high-resolution isotherms. This experimental approach combined with force field Monte Carlo simulations reveals distinct pore filling adsorption behaviors for the selected probes, with argon and oxygen showing abrupt adsorption in the open pore form of DUT-49, in contrast with the gradual filling for nitrogen and carbon monoxide. A complex structural transition behavior of DUT-49 observed upon nitrogen adsorption is elucidated through an isotherm deconvolution in order to quantify the fractions of the open pore, contracted pore, and intermediate pore forms that coexist at a given gas pressure. Finally, the heat flow measured during the guest-induced structural contraction of DUT-49 allowed an exploration of complex open-contracted pore transition energetics, leading to a first assessment of the energy required to induce this spectacular structural change.
Framework
rigidity upon adsorption is still a common assumption
applied to porous materials. Although adsorbate-induced structural
changes of host frameworks were revealed more than 90 years ago,[1] the advent of precisely tunable compliant adsorbents
which can respond to diverse stimuli such as guest loading,[2−4] temperature,[5] or mechanical pressure[6−9] has sparked tremendous scientific curiosity. The family of porous
hybrid materials, namely metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), has
been instrumental in furthering the possibility space of flexible
adsorbents,[10−13] in part due to the structural control afforded by their building
blocks and regular crystalline nature. Various flexible behaviors
of their architectures such as gate opening,[14] pore collapse,[15] breathing,[16] and swelling[17] have
been observed.DUT-49 (Dresden University of Technology No.
49) is a member of
the flexible MOF family, constructed of metal–organic polyhedra
(MOP) interconnected in an fcu topology, resulting in
a hierarchical pore size distribution and a high surface area (in
excess of 5400 m2/g).[18] Besides
these structural features, DUT-49 has shown the ability to suddenly
switch from its initial open pore (op) form to a contracted
pore (cp) version upon gas adsorption, simultaneously
ejecting part of the guest molecules from its crystal structure, as
illustrated in Figure . This behavior leads to an increase of gas pressure in the containing
enclosure and has been dubbed “negative gas adsorption”,
or NGA, owing to its counterintuitive nature.[19] The micromechanical and energetic principles underpinning this unexpected
behavior were identified computationally[20−22] as adsorption
stress-induced linker buckling, leading to a structural transition
between metastable equilibrium states. More recently, several derivative
materials were synthesized through an isoreticular approach, with
longer central struts shown to increase the predisposition toward
flexibility,[23] and more general rules for
adsorption-induced contraction were investigated in a simplistic slit-pore
model.[22] However, a complete understanding
of the system has yet to be achieved, in particular regarding the
guest and temperature dependence of the structural contraction, with
both variables being intimately linked to the strength of the host/guest
interactions as well as to the energetics of the structural transition,
insofar never determined experimentally.
Figure 1
Schematic of the DUT-49
open pore (op) transition
upon gas adsorption to a closed pore (cp) phase, accompanied
by expulsion of guest adsorbate from pores, followed by gradual reopening
at higher pressures. Also represented are the three pore families:
octahedral (orange), tetrahedral (blue), and the cuboctahedral metal–organic
polyhedron (green), as well as the corresponding linker shape in the
two phases.
Schematic of the DUT-49
open pore (op) transition
upon gas adsorption to a closed pore (cp) phase, accompanied
by expulsion of guest adsorbate from pores, followed by gradual reopening
at higher pressures. Also represented are the three pore families:
octahedral (orange), tetrahedral (blue), and the cuboctahedral metal–organic
polyhedron (green), as well as the corresponding linker shape in the
two phases.Microcalorimetry is a powerful
technique which allows a direct in situ monitoring
of the energetics of adsorption as a
function of guest uptake. Here, the differential enthalpy of adsorption
is evaluated concurrently with the isotherm, permitting an accurate
assessment of combined host/guest and guest/guest interactions. When
the porous material undergoes a guest-induced structural transition,
the additional energy generation or consumption of the host transition
contributes to the total heat flow, increasing or lowering the amount
of heat recorded by the microcalorimeter, respectively.[24] For DUT-49 it is known that the increased interactions
between the guests and the cp phase due to a more confined
environment allow for its stabilization, at least until the penalty
of guest expulsion becomes too high.[20] However,
these factors have not been captured experimentally due to the complex
energetic landscape. In the following work microcalorimetry and molecular
simulations are combined to investigate this limit, alongside an in-depth characterization of adsorption, pore filling, and
energetics.Microcalorimetric studies on DUT-49 and its analogues
have been
solely reported at 303 K for n-butane.[23,25] The strong guest–temperature dependence of the op–cp structural transition previously observed[19,23] calls for the selection of multiple probes which would allow for
a comparison of the MOF switching behavior outside the temperature
range of a conventional calorimeter. Here, four model probes (argon,
oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon monoxide) with distinct intrinsic properties
were considered at cryogenic temperatures, a range where N2 and Ar have been previously shown to induce the contraction of DUT-49.[23] A home-built Tian–Calvet calorimeter
which can operate in these conditions was used,[26] in conjunction with a continuous, quasi-equilibrium, adsorbate
introduction method, allowing for subtle changes in the differential
enthalpy of adsorption as well as transient phenomena to be observed
experimentally.Using this setup, we were able not only to obtain
high-resolution
isotherms of all studied probes on DUT-49 but also to precisely measure
the corresponding differential enthalpy of adsorption for each probe.
These experimental findings were corroborated by force field Monte
Carlo (MC) simulations to reveal the similarity and specificity of
the probes in terms of adsorption behaviors. Additionally, the continuous
introduction method employed in tandem with the MC calculations allowed
us to determine for the first time the enthalpy of transition between
the guest-loaded open and contracted forms of DUT-49 and to evidence
its guest-dependence. We demonstrate that this enthalpy is indeed
a function of the difference in integral enthalpy of adsorption between
the two loaded op–cp conformations, shedding further
light on the complex energetic landscape of DUT-49 and its host–guest
chemistry.
Materials and Methods
Material
DUT-49
samples used in this study were taken
from the same batch, with the synthesis, activation, and characterization
described in detail in a previous publication,[27] where it is labeled as DUT-49(4). After supercritical CO2 activation, samples were stored and transferred under inert
atmosphere in an Ar-filled glovebox.
Adsorption Microcalorimetry
Adsorption microcalorimetry
at temperatures below ambient was performed by using a homemade calorimeter
in a diving-bell configuration, first described by Rouquerol[26] and further detailed elsewhere.[28] In short, the setup consists of a Tian–Calvet differential
calorimeter which is immersed in a cryogenic bath at its boiling point
(liquid nitrogen for 77 K or argon for 87 K). The bath is refilled
as required, to maintain a constant fluid level throughout the experiment.
The upper part of the system, containing the automated gas dosing
apparatus, is kept in a temperature-controlled enclosure at 303 K.
The adsorbent is placed in a J-shaped cell made of borosilicate glass
to minimize thermal expansion stress and introduced into the fluid
filled Dewar and through the bottom of the differential calorimeter.
Good thermal equilibrium between the cell and surrounding thermopile
is ensured using a helium blanket in the calorimetric enclosure, kept
under a small positive pressure through a continuous nominal flow.
The experiment starts when the calorimeter signal recedes to baseline
(5 μW). A schematic and depiction of the apparatus is provided
in Figure S1.As observed in previous
experiments with DUT-49 and nitrogen, argon, methane, and n-butane,[23,25] the commonly employed stepwise
dosing method makes difficult an accurate pressure control around
the critical transition uptake. A possible alternative might be the
use of very small dosing steps. However, this approach would increase
the experimental duration and decrease the resolution of each step
as consecutive doses introduce a cumulative error in the pressure
measurement. Furthermore, the local pressure variations during dosing
may induce a premature structural transition. To alleviate this concern,
we have instead used a continuous adsorbate introduction method.[28] In brief, the flow of adsorbate into the cell
is kept constant by a restriction in the pipe diameter which is strict
enough to allow the gas to enter via a sonic flow regime. Above a
certain pressure differential, the sonic nozzle allows the flow rate
to become purely a function of upstream pressure and environmental
temperature. As a steady flow rate is only possible with a pressure
difference above 3 bar (gas dependent), the desorption branch cannot
be measured.For each experiment, a small amount (10 to 20 mg)
of DUT-49 was
introduced in the cell while maintained under an inert gas flow. The
amount of material represents a trade-off between isotherm/enthalpy
accuracy and experimental duration. The cell was then sealed with
an oxybutane torch prior to evacuation, leak check, and sample activation
at 420 K under dynamic vacuum (down to 10–4 mbar)
for at least 8 h. Any repeat measurements on the same material were
performed with an identical thermal reactivation procedure. A separate
calibration step was carried out at the start of each experiment to
determine the adsorbate flow rate and the dead volume before the entrance
to the cell. Experimental flow rate was maintained between 1 to 3
mmol h–1, low enough to consider the system at quasi-equilibrium.
This assumption was verified by conducting multiple experiments at
different upstream pressures. A perfect overlap of the measured isotherms
confirms that the experiments took place at equilibration times below
the dead time of the calorimeter (Figure S4). The complete data set is available in the SI in Figure S2 and Figure S3.
Computational
Details
Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC)
simulations were carried out at 77 K to compute the adsorption isotherms
and enthalpies for argon, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon monoxide in
DUT-49 cp and op forms by employing the
Complex Adsorption and Diffusion Simulation Suite (CADSS) code.[29] Additional calculations were performed for argon
at 87 K while the adsorption isotherms for nitrogen were equally
computed for the ip form (structure from ref (27)). The simulation box was
made of 1 conventional unit cell for all DUT-49 phases with atomic
coordinates taken from the previous study.[19] The fugacities for all adsorbates at a given thermodynamic condition
were computed using the Peng–Robinson equation of state. For
each state point, 108 Monte Carlo steps were used for both
equilibration and production runs. The guest/DUT-49 and guest/guest
interactions were treated using a van der Waals contribution with
a cutoff of 12 Å. The Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential parameters
for the atoms of the inorganic and organic parts of the DUT-49 framework
were derived from the universal force field (UFF)[30] and DREIDING,[31] respectively.
Argon was represented by a single LJ site described by the OPLS force
field. The other adsorbates were modeled as two-LJ sites with associated
potential parameters taken from the work of ref (32) for CO and from the TraPPE
force field[33] for N2 and O2. Lorentz–Berthelot (LB) combination rules were used
to calculate the cross LJ potential parameters (Table S2).
Results and Discussion
Probe Dependence of the
Adsorption Isotherm
Recorded
isotherms at 77 K for the four probes are depicted in Figure and compared with the GCMC
simulated isotherms for the open and contracted pore forms of DUT-49.
It should be noted that the selected probes differ in their physicochemical
properties, such as size, shape, and polarity (with several of these
parameters given in Table S1). Three isotherm
regions can be clearly distinguished for Ar and O2 and
are archetypal of the NGA behavior. Initial loading occurs in the op form, until contraction of the hierarchical pore network
leads to expulsion of the adsorbed guest and a decrease of the adsorbed
amount around p/p0 =
0.1. After this step a plateau is observed, as the cp form is fully saturated with the probe. Finally, a gradual reopening
of the cp form is observed, until the material is completely
regenerated. In sharp contrast, carbon monoxide does not appear to
induce a structural contraction in DUT-49, with adsorption occurring
purely in the op form. The transition occurring in the
nitrogen isotherm is more complex and will be further discussed in
a later section.
Figure 2
Experimental (black) and GCMC-simulated isotherms on DUT-49 op (red) and cp (blue) at 77 K for argon, oxygen,
nitrogen, and carbon monoxide. Shaded regions highlight ranges in
which the material has undergone transitions and is not in an op phase.
Experimental (black) and GCMC-simulated isotherms on DUT-49 op (red) and cp (blue) at 77 K for argon, oxygen,
nitrogen, and carbon monoxide. Shaded regions highlight ranges in
which the material has undergone transitions and is not in an op phase.In all cases, the GCMC
simulated data for the cp and op forms capture
well the distinct regions of the experimental
adsorption isotherms. Total uptake in the op form (as
the uptake at p/p0 =
0.6) and in the cp form (as the uptake at p/p0 = 0.3 after contraction) is nearly
identical to the experimental findings. Furthermore, the pore filling
steps coincide similarly well, which validates the force field parameters
used to describe all present interactions.A three-step adsorption
isotherm is expected in the simulated op isotherms, as
the framework is characterized by a trimodal
hierarchical pore size distribution. The cuboctahedral pore at the
center of the MOP is completely filled at low pressures, followed
by slow multilayer-like filling of the tetrahedral and octahedral
larger pores, as was previously shown experimentally though in situ neutron diffraction.[23] However, subtle features emerge when comparing the condensation
step in the tetrahedral and octahedral pores with different probes. Figure shows that with
O2 and Ar, this step is sharp, corresponding to an abrupt
pore filling. In contrast, the isotherm is smoother for CO and even
more so for N2, with the pores being filled gradually.
A careful analysis of MC snapshots during adsorption reveals that
compared to Ar and O2, both CO and N2 are more
homogeneously distributed within the whole porosity at initial and
intermediate pressures (shown in Figure S5), likely owing to the difference between the adsorption temperature
and the boiling point of the respective adsorbates (values in Table S1). This scenario indicates that a substantial
reorganization of N2 and CO is required to accommodate
the subsequent molecules when the gas pressure increases, leading
to a gradual pore filling. The predicted probe-dependent pore filling
mechanism is reminiscent to that previously reported for the same
probe molecules in the pore-gating ZIF-8.[34] Regarding adsorption in the cp form, the octahedral
and tetrahedral voids are greatly reduced in volume, resulting into
a filling of all these pores at very low pressures.
Figure 3
Breakdown of simulated
adsorption isotherms on the op phase into fraction of
probe uptake in each pore type: octahedral
(orange), tetrahedral (blue), and cuboctahedral (green). The assignment
of a probe into a cavity was performed based on a radial distribution
from the center of each pore type.
Breakdown of simulated
adsorption isotherms on the op phase into fraction of
probe uptake in each pore type: octahedral
(orange), tetrahedral (blue), and cuboctahedral (green). The assignment
of a probe into a cavity was performed based on a radial distribution
from the center of each pore type.
Specific Case of Nitrogen Adsorption
The different
steps observed in the experimental nitrogen isotherm (Figure ) are unlike the transition
mechanics exhibited by argon and oxygen. While guest ejection is still
observed at p/p0 = 0.1,
the total uptake after NGA does indicate a fully contracted phase,
as evidenced by the large difference between the experimental and
GCMC simulated uptakes in the cp existence range. Furthermore,
the nitrogen induced reopening of DUT-49 is characterized by three
distinct steps, as opposed to one with other adsorbates. This behavior
is also encountered in the results of ref (27), where crystal size is responsible for the shift
from nonflexible to switching, with new intermediate phases observable
in between. Thus, we can expect that a fraction of the MOF undergoes
(i) an incomplete transition to an intermediate pore form (ip) that was previously identified,[27] which
(ii) reopens partially as a larger pore intermediate form (ip) and then (iii) fully. It can therefore
be assumed that nitrogen adsorption takes place near the lower limit
of favorable transition energetics, where particulate surface effects
can have a high influence on the energy barrier of transition, prohibiting
a direct access to the op form.An estimation of
the fraction of sample that undergoes each type of structural transformation
is essential for drawing conclusions on the evolution of DUT-49. For
this purpose, we assumed that the total adsorption uptake can be described
as a linear combination of the simulated uptake in the existing phases
in each pressure range. Figure graphically exemplifies isotherm deconvolution for the (cp + ip) and (cp + op) ranges, from which it
can be estimated that 44% of the sample undergoes a complete contraction.
Thus, the amount of material which undergoes a full op –
cp contraction is a modest ratio of the total amount of sample.
Figure 4
(top)
Depiction of different phase mixtures [1–4] and phase
transformations [a–d] throughout the nitrogen adsorption isotherm
of DUT-49. (bottom) The simulated isotherms of the different phases
in the highlighted region are linearly combined to obtain the different
contribution of each phase when there is a (left) cp + ip coexistence and (right) cp + op coexistence. For the
displayed isotherm 44% of the material undergoes complete transition
to the cp phase.
(top)
Depiction of different phase mixtures [1-4] and phase
transformations [a–d] throughout the nitrogen adsorption isotherm
of DUT-49. (bottom) The simulated isotherms of the different phases
in the highlighted region are linearly combined to obtain the different
contribution of each phase when there is a (left) cp + ip coexistence and (right) cp + op coexistence. For the
displayed isotherm 44% of the material undergoes complete transition
to the cp phase.We have observed that
sequential nitrogen isotherms recorded on
the same cell lead to a reduction of the amount of material undergoing
complete op–cp transition (Figure S6). In the case of the cell in Figure , the op–cp conversion
fraction drops from 44% to 17% in a second experiment. However, subsequent
isotherms are repeatable and do not induce further degradation. The
resulting trends from all experiments are presented in Table S3 and are consistent with the previous
observation. We can tentatively surmise that the initial structural
contraction may lead to the fragmentation and suppression of complete
transition in a fraction of crystallites, likely those above a certain
size threshold. Previously published SEM images before and after an
adsorption cycle[27] appear to support this
hypothesis. While very small particles appear to fully lose their
compliance,[27] no proportion of DUT-49 in
our experiments remains static, thus only very large crystals undergo
stress-induced attrition. It should be mentioned that in the case
of other probes, such as argon and oxygen, cycling appears to also
induce a progressive amorphization of the material, as can be observed
in Figure S8.
Adsorption and Structure
Contraction Energetics
We
turn to the differential enthalpy of adsorption as measured through
microcalorimetry to delve deeper into the interactions of all adsorbate/DUT-49
systems. Enthalpy curves of the four probes are presented in Figure , together with GCMC
simulated adsorption enthalpy for both op and cp structures. The sharp vertical discontinuities in the experimental
curves are indicative of NGA, while the sudden large increase in differential
enthalpy at the saturation pressure is explained through the loss
of resolution when the adsorbed amount decreases as the isotherm plateaus.
The general shape of the enthalpy curve is reminiscent of what was
previously observed for n-butane at 303 K,[23,25] suggesting an identical energetic landscape throughout pore filling
with all probes. Two regions of the enthalpy curves can be further
highlighted for analysis: the region below 0.1 fractional loading,
which can be ascribed to the initial interactions of the probe with
the MOF framework, and the plateau after structural contraction, where
the amount adsorbed is also accompanied by a progressive framework
reopening.
Figure 5
Comparison between simulated and measured enthalpy curves at 77
K for all probes. Fractional loading is defined as uptake divided
by maximum loading and is represented on the x axis.
The dotted vertical line indicates structural contraction; in this
range curves have been trimmed above 15 kJ mol–1 for clarity.
Comparison between simulated and measured enthalpy curves at 77
K for all probes. Fractional loading is defined as uptake divided
by maximum loading and is represented on the x axis.
The dotted vertical line indicates structural contraction; in this
range curves have been trimmed above 15 kJ mol–1 for clarity.For Ar and O2, the
experimental and simulated enthalpy
profiles have a near-perfect overlap in the low-pressure range. The
adsorbate/DUT-49 interactions can be described purely through dispersion
interactions and are in the region of 10–11 kJ mol–1. The slight increase in Δadsh upon
further uptake can be associated with the increased guest/guest interactions
during the complete filling of the MOP pore. Dissimilarly, a deviation
is present for the CO enthalpy curve, as the measured initial Δadsh is around 30 kJ mol–1 vs 11–14 kJ mol–1 by GCMC simulations.
This is consistent with the formation of Cu(II)···CO
adducts as seen in similar paddlewheel based MOFs such as HKUST-1[35] which cannot be accurately described using the
generic force field parameters considered here. Indeed, a visual examination
of the carbon monoxide saturated DUT-49 (Figure
S7) shows a pronounced color change and suggests a change in
the coordination sphere of the copper atoms. As the sample is brought
to ambient temperature, the cyan color disappears, attesting to the
labile nature of the interaction, in contrast to stable Cu(I)···CO
coordination compounds. The initial enthalpy of nitrogen adsorption
(15 kJ mol–1) is also higher than the value predicted
for the op form (10 kJ mol–1), although
to a lesser extent than CO, likely due to similar phenomena. It is
worth mentioning that both CO and N2 interactions occur
only at low fractional loadings, below the range in which NGA has
been observed to occur. The enthalpy of adsorption after this region
is comparable to the simulated value. Therefore, while specific host/guest
interactions may be present at open metal sites, they seem to play
a negligible role in the global mechanism of adsorption.On
the other hand, the influence of guest properties such as polarity
on the thermodynamic feasibility of transition is less apparent. Preliminary
evidence suggests that the temperature limits for NGA existence are
correlated to intensive thermodynamic properties of the guest, like
the critical point, when considering nonspecific adsorbates.[36] The behavior of carbon monoxide would then buckle
this trend, as one would expect NGA transition at the same temperature
as nitrogen. It is then reasonable to assume that strong host–guest
interactions will shift the energy difference between the op and cp loaded phases, leading to a corresponding shift
in the contraction temperature range. Unfortunately, a complete picture
is difficult to obtain, as other adsorbates characterized by strong
guest–guest interactions, such as water and ethanol[3] also attack the metal-linker bond, destroying
the framework.The enthalpies of adsorption recorded at higher
partial pressures
for Ar and O2, corresponding to simultaneous adsorption
and structural reopening, are remarkably similar to the simulated
values for the same loading in the op form. It is expected
that any further adsorption in a filled cp–op intermediate
pore system would have a much higher Δadsh, comparable with what is predicted for the cp form (14–16 kJ mol–1). We can therefore
conclude that a part of the energy of adsorption must be required
for structural reopening, offsetting the total measured enthalpy through
microcalorimetry.As a consequence of continuous adsorbate introduction,
we can precisely
monitor the heat output during the op–cp transition
step, analogous to a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Examples
of time-resolved curves can be seen in Figure S9, with a complex peak observed during structural contraction. The
transition of any crystallite is likely to trigger a cascade effect,
where local increases in guest pressure induce contraction of neighboring
particles. As such, deconvolution of the signal into individual contributions
is nearly impossible, since minute factors such as diffusion effects,
cell geometry, sample amount, or flow rate can drastically change
its signature. However, by integrating the heat evolved Q, a cumulative enthalpy of transition
for the guest/DUT-49 system (ΔHexp) may be obtained. It should be noted that while the flow of adsorbate
is not stopped throughout structural transition, the flow rate is
minimal, to the point of negligible impact.During contraction,
three main components of the total enthalpy
as measured by calorimetry (ΔHexp) can be rationalized:which can be represented
mathematically with the following
approximation:Energy
required for structural transition, ΔH, as the op form is more stable than the cp form;[19]Energy required
to desorb and expel the guest from the
material pores, ΔHdes;Energy associated with the increased interaction strength
between the adsorbed guest and the smaller pores of the cp phase with respect to the op phase, ΔHinter;The first component only depends on
the host, while the latter
two are a function of the guest as well. It is also apparent that
the last term is the only exothermic component and thus must overcome
the former two in order for the transition to be exothermic. Here,
we approximate the combined contribution of the last two components
as the difference between the integral enthalpy of adsorption of the op and cp form, at the transition uptake for
each phase (or ΔΔHads), an
assumption based on guest desorption during NGA occurring from a completely op form:As a measurement of the enthalpy of
adsorption on a pure op or cp phase is physically
impossible, we rely
on the simulated enthalpy curves, in view of their validation in the
previous sections, while taking nop and ncp from the experimental isotherms. A graphical
overview of the calculation procedure is depicted in Figure . It is obvious that the energy
available to overcome the enthalpic cost of structural transition
sharply decreases as a larger amount of guest is adsorbed in the op phase, ultimately becoming endothermic. As the amount of
“guest overload” was found to be a function of temperature
by Krause and co-workers,[19,23] this method predicts
an upper threshold for exothermic NGA.
Figure 6
(top) Graphical representation
of the calculation of ΔΔHads for argon and nitrogen starting from simulated
enthalpy curves of the op (red) and cp (blue)
phases. Shaded regions correspond to integral enthalpy of adsorption
(ΔadsH) for the two phases. Integration
limits are between 0 and the transition uptake taken from experimental
isotherms in Figure as nop and ncp, respectively. ΔΔHads is
the difference between the two areas. The experimental curve is represented
in light gray. (bottom) Calculated ΔΔHads as a function of uptake at transition. Below the curve
minima, nop = ncp and no desorption would take place during a transition. Afterward, ncp is limited by the pore volume of the cp phase. Dotted line shows the calculated value for the above
case.
(top) Graphical representation
of the calculation of ΔΔHads for argon and nitrogen starting from simulated
enthalpy curves of the op (red) and cp (blue)
phases. Shaded regions correspond to integral enthalpy of adsorption
(ΔadsH) for the two phases. Integration
limits are between 0 and the transition uptake taken from experimental
isotherms in Figure as nop and ncp, respectively. ΔΔHads is
the difference between the two areas. The experimental curve is represented
in light gray. (bottom) Calculated ΔΔHads as a function of uptake at transition. Below the curve
minima, nop = ncp and no desorption would take place during a transition. Afterward, ncp is limited by the pore volume of the cp phase. Dotted line shows the calculated value for the above
case.Nitrogen appears to still induce
a contraction beyond this limit
(as seen in Figure ). Indeed, the microcalorimetry peak observed during transition shows
an endothermic process (Figure S9), unlike
any other probe at 77 K. Two observations may be made for this counterintuitive
behavior. First, it highlights that the increase in entropy generated
by the expulsion to the gas phase of a large amount of guest from
the material pores can also offset the Gibbs free energy of the transition
so that the transition is spontaneous. Second, while the recorded
signal is endothermic, its integral is significantly lower than what
is predicted through GCMC calculations of ΔΔHads (332 kJ mol–1 vs 1877 kJ mol–1, per unit cell). As the NGA step leads to the simultaneous
formation of two phases, the exothermic transition to the ip phase can offset the endothermic transition to the cp phase. Indeed, a direct correlation is found between the fraction
of ip phase formed and the enthalpy of the transition
step (Figure S10).Due to the complex
behavior upon N2 adsorption, the
previous effects cannot be separated. Thus, to observe the evolution
of enthalpy with temperature, the Ar/DUT-49 system was selected owing
to its unambiguous guest-induced op–cp transition
(see Figure and Figure ) and good correspondence
to in silico enthalpies. Separate isotherms and enthalpy
curves were obtained at 87 K with the same experimental setup and
computational methodology (Figure S11).
At this temperature, a larger NGA step is observed, as the system
is further loaded before contraction. It is seen that the measured
and simulated differential enthalpy curves are not impacted by the
change in temperature, thus the calculated ΔΔHads curve in Figure can be considered interchangeable at 87 K. However,
the NGA event becomes endothermic, similar to nitrogen at 77 K (Figure S12). Therefore, we can conclude not only
that ΔΔHads is a good predictor
of transition energetics but also that entropy is a critical variable
that controls the feasibility range of the structural contraction.
As the difference in entropy between a gas phase and a liquid phase
(as assumed to exist in the pores of DUT-49) decreases with temperature,
the combined effect of increasing ΔΔHads and decreasing TΔSads offers a rationalization for the disappearance of
NGA at higher temperatures. Such entropic contributions due to phase
transitions in both the solid and fluid phase are unprecedented in
any guest-responsive system and clearly demonstrate the complexity
that NGA imposes on such responsive systems.Finally, ΔΔHads is related
to the experimental enthalpy measured during NGA (ΔHexp) by an offset corresponding to the enthalpy of structural
contraction. This method is similar in concept to the DSC/TGA experiments
previously employed for determining the enthalpy of structural transition
for MIL-53,[37] with the scanning performed
in terms of adsorbate pressure rather than temperature. By substituting
in eq :The ΔH term can be obtained from the free energy difference
between the guest-free op and cp phases
previously calculated by ref (20). The two values can be equated directly if we assume that
(i) the entropy difference between the two phases is negligible,[20,38] (ii) the pressure on the material is sufficiently small, and (iii)
there is little to no temperature dependence of these quantities.
If ΔH is taken as 900 kJ mol–1 (per
unit cell) and ΔΔHads as calculated
in Figure , the two
sides of the equation take the values in Table .
Table 1
Comparison for Experimental
and Simulated
Enthalpy Contributions in DUT-49
ΔHexp(kJ mol–1)
ΔΔHads + ΔHop–cp(kJ mol–1)
77 K
–1033
–481
87 K
19
581
At both 77 and 87 K, the two values are remarkably
similar in magnitude
and sign. While the offset can be attributed to contributions from
the assumptions made, the experimental error, and simulation parameters,
it is the first time that the two methodologies can be directly compared
and validated for the enthalpy contributions of the transition event
in a compliant material such as DUT-49.
Conclusion
Low
temperature adsorption microcalorimetry was used to perform
an in-depth study of the adsorption of argon, nitrogen,
oxygen, and carbon monoxide in the flexible DUT-49 system. When combined
with molecular simulations, the setup employed in a quasi-equilibrium
introduction mode appears as a powerful approach to shed light not
only on the mechanism of adsorption in compliant solids but also on
the subtle and transient energetics of the structural transition step
itself. We can draw the following conclusions:The enthalpy of
transition for the
system is a function of the amount of op phase overloading,
with higher loadings leading to an increased NGA amount and an increased
energetic cost. Transition entropy change can offset this cost, but
only to a point. Furthermore, for the first time, a direct comparison
of the experimental and simulated enthalpy contributions of structural
contraction can be made, with good agreement between the two methods.The complex behavior exhibited
throughout
nitrogen adsorption can be deconvoluted by using contributions of
simulated adsorption isotherms to obtain the fraction of material
undergoing contraction to each phase (cp–op or cp–ip). Material cycling is seen to decrease the fraction
of complete cp–op contraction, as expected from
a batch of small crystal DUT-49, therefore providing evidence for
crystal fragmentation.The mechanism of adsorption strongly
depends on the probe molecules. It was demonstrated that the pore
filling differs with the physicochemical properties of the adsorbates
leading to a progressive smearing of the condensation step in the
large pores of DUT-49 from O2 to N2. Strongly
interacting guests, such as CO may shift the existence range of the
NGA transition.We consider our findings
in this work as a key step toward understanding
the energetic and entropic contributions that occur during NGA. They
not only provide direct experimental access to parameters previously
only captured computationally, they also demonstrate the complexity
of the interplay between adsorption-induced structural transitions
and subsequent gas release upon NGA. In particular the estimation
of entropic contribution but also internal heat management[24] occurring upon structural contraction will further
help toward application of the phenomenon of NGA as well as support
the design of other porous solids with NGA transitions.
Authors: Isabelle Beurroies; Mohammed Boulhout; Philip L Llewellyn; Bogdan Kuchta; Gérard Férey; Christian Serre; Renaud Denoyel Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Yun Liu; Jae-Hyuk Her; Anne Dailly; Anibal J Ramirez-Cuesta; Dan A Neumann; Craig M Brown Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Simon Krause; Volodymyr Bon; Irena Senkovska; Ulrich Stoeck; Dirk Wallacher; Daniel M Többens; Stefan Zander; Renjith S Pillai; Guillaume Maurin; François-Xavier Coudert; Stefan Kaskel Journal: Nature Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sven M J Rogge; Senne Caroes; Ruben Demuynck; Michel Waroquier; Veronique Van Speybroeck; An Ghysels Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 6.006
Authors: Simon Krause; Jack D Evans; Volodymyr Bon; Irena Senkovska; François-Xavier Coudert; Daniel M Többens; Dirk Wallacher; Nico Grimm; Stefan Kaskel Journal: Faraday Discuss Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Pu Zhao; Giulio I Lampronti; Gareth O Lloyd; Michael T Wharmby; Sébastien Facq; Anthony K Cheetham; Simon A T Redfern Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2014-02-17 Impact factor: 9.811
Authors: Simon Krause; Volodymyr Bon; Irena Senkovska; Daniel M Többens; Dirk Wallacher; Renjith S Pillai; Guillaume Maurin; Stefan Kaskel Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Simon Krause; Jack D Evans; Volodymyr Bon; Irena Senkovska; Paul Iacomi; Felicitas Kolbe; Sebastian Ehrling; Erik Troschke; Jürgen Getzschmann; Daniel M Többens; Alexandra Franz; Dirk Wallacher; Pascal G Yot; Guillaume Maurin; Eike Brunner; Philip L Llewellyn; François-Xavier Coudert; Stefan Kaskel Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 14.919