Literature DB >> 35601969

[18F]-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) PET/MRI hypoxic fraction distinguishes neuroinflammatory pseudoprogression from recurrent glioblastoma in patients treated with pembrolizumab.

Ramon F Barajas1,2, Prakash Ambady3, Jeanne Link4, Kenneth A Krohn4, Ahmed Raslan5, Nadine Mallak6, Randy Woltjer7, Leslie Muldoon3, Edward A Neuwelt3,5,8.   

Abstract

Response assessment after immunotherapy remains a major challenge in glioblastoma due to an expected increased incidence of pseudoprogression. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard for monitoring therapeutic response, however, is markedly limited in characterizing pseudoprogression. Given that hypoxia is an important defining feature of glioblastoma regrowth, we hypothesized that [18F]-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET) could provide an additional physiological measure for the diagnosis of immunotherapeutic failure. Six patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who had previously received maximal safe resection followed by Stupp protocol CRT concurrent with pembrolizumab immunotherapy were recruited for FMISO PET and Gd-MRI at the time of presumed progression. The hypoxic fraction was defined as the ratio of hypoxic volume to T1-weighted gadolinium-enhancing volume. Four patients diagnosed with pseudoprogression demonstrated a mean hypoxic fraction of 9.8 ± 10%. Two with recurrent tumor demonstrated a mean hypoxic fraction of 131 ± 66%. Our results, supported by histopathology, suggest that the noninvasive assessment of hypoxic fraction by FMISO PET/MRI is clinically feasible and may serve as a biologically specific metric of therapeutic failure.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FMISO; RANO; glioblastoma; pembrolizumab; pseudoprogression

Year:  2022        PMID: 35601969      PMCID: PMC9113243          DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurooncol Pract        ISSN: 2054-2577


  21 in total

Review 1.  Multiparametric MRI as a potential surrogate endpoint for decision-making in early treatment response following concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chong Hyun Suh; Ho Sung Kim; Seung Chai Jung; Choong Gon Choi; Sang Joon Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  'Pseudopalisading' necrosis in glioblastoma: a familiar morphologic feature that links vascular pathology, hypoxia, and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Yuan Rong; Donald L Durden; Erwin G Van Meir; Daniel J Brat
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.685

3.  Synthesis and biodistribution of 18F-labeled fluoronitroimidazoles: potential in vivo markers of hypoxic tissue.

Authors:  P A Jerabek; T B Patrick; M R Kilbourn; D D Dischino; M J Welch
Journal:  Int J Rad Appl Instrum A       Date:  1986

Review 4.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Susan M Chang; Martin J Van den Bent; Michael A Vogelbaum; David R Macdonald; Eudocia Q Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Combined iron oxide nanoparticle ferumoxytol and gadolinium contrast enhanced MRI define glioblastoma pseudoprogression.

Authors:  Ramon F Barajas; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Daniel Schwartz; Heather L McConnell; David R Pettersson; Andrea Horvath; Laszlo Szidonya; Csanad G Varallyay; Jenny Firkins; Jerry J Jaboin; Charlotte D Kubicky; Ahmed M Raslan; Aclan Dogan; Justin S Cetas; Jeremy Ciporen; Seunggu J Han; Prakash Ambady; Leslie L Muldoon; Randy Woltjer; William D Rooney; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology: a report of the RANO working group.

Authors:  Hideho Okada; Michael Weller; Raymond Huang; Gaetano Finocchiaro; Mark R Gilbert; Wolfgang Wick; Benjamin M Ellingson; Naoya Hashimoto; Ian F Pollack; Alba A Brandes; Enrico Franceschi; Christel Herold-Mende; Lakshmi Nayak; Ashok Panigrahy; Whitney B Pope; Robert Prins; John H Sampson; Patrick Y Wen; David A Reardon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging techniques for treatment response evaluation in patients with high-grade glioma, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bart R J van Dijken; Peter Jan van Laar; Gea A Holtman; Anouk van der Hoorn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Glioma FMISO PET/MR Imaging Concurrent with Antiangiogenic Therapy: Molecular Imaging as a Clinical Tool in the Burgeoning Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Ramon F Barajas; Kenneth A Krohn; Jeanne M Link; Randall A Hawkins; Jennifer L Clarke; Miguel H Pampaloni; Soonmee Cha
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2016-10-31

9.  ACRIN 6684: Multicenter, phase II assessment of tumor hypoxia in newly diagnosed glioblastoma using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Ratai; Zheng Zhang; James Fink; Mark Muzi; Lucy Hanna; Erin Greco; Todd Richards; Daniel Kim; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Akiva Mintz; Lale Kostakoglu; Melissa Prah; Benjamin Ellingson; Kathleen Schmainda; Gregory Sorensen; Daniel Barboriak; David Mankoff; Elizabeth R Gerstner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Assessment of the Prognostic Value of Radiomic Features in 18F-FMISO PET Imaging of Hypoxia in Postsurgery Brain Cancer Patients: Secondary Analysis of Imaging Data from a Single-Center Study and the Multicenter ACRIN 6684 Trial.

Authors:  Mark Muzi; Eric Wolsztynski; James R Fink; Janet N O'Sullivan; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.