| Literature DB >> 35601765 |
K Wuthijaree1, P Tatsapong1, C Lambertz2.
Abstract
The present study determined the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in small ruminants kept in smallholder farms in Phitsanulok, Northern Thailand. A total of 885 goats from 31 smallholder farms were selected randomly between May 2019 to January 2020. Fecal samples were collected to estimate fecal egg counts and oocysts counts using the modified McMaster technique. Furthermore, pooled fecal samples from each of the farms were cultured in order to differentiate third-stage larvae of nematode. Examination of fecal samples revealed that 885 were positive for one or more parasites, giving an overall prevalence of 87.2 %, of which 38.6 % were infected with one and 48.6 % with multiple parasite. Strongyles and Eimeria oocysts were the most prevalent. Haemonchus contortus and Strongyloides papillosus were the predominant species based on the percentage of larvae in fecal cultures. Tapeworm eggs were encountered in 14.2 % of all samples. No significant difference in gastrointestinal parasite prevalence was associated with sex of the host. Infection was significantly (P = 0.009) highest in poor body conditioned goats (72.0 %) as compared to moderate (48.9 %) and good body conditioned (50.0 %) goats. This report on prevalence of GI parasites of small ruminants in smallholder farms in Northern Thailand reveals a high endoparasitic infections that appeared well-adapted to environmental conditions. Further studies on endoparasite control are required to establish the impact of parasitism on productive performance, including monitoring control parasite programs are needed for better health and productivity.Entities:
Keywords: gastrointestinal parasites; goats; prevalence; smallholders
Year: 2022 PMID: 35601765 PMCID: PMC9075877 DOI: 10.2478/helm-2022-0007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Helminthologia ISSN: 0440-6605 Impact factor: 1.176
Fig. 1Five districts which were investigated for parasitic infections in small ruminants.
Descriptive statistics (number and percentage of positive samples and mean, SD, Min, and Max) of fecal egg/oocyte counts in goats of 31 Smallholder Farms in Thailand.
| Variables | Examined | Positive [ | Mean | SD | Min – Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastrointestinal strongyles | 885 | 680 (76.8%) | 799.0 | 1348.6 | 0 – 13333 |
| 885 | 4 (0.5%) | 0.2 | 3.4 | 0.58 | |
| 885 | 8 (0.9%) | 0.6 | 7.1 | 0 – 104 | |
|
| 885 | 1 (0.1%) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 – 1368 |
| 885 | 445 (50.3%) | 427.6 | 118.1 | 0 – 96285 | |
| 885 | 132 (14.2%) | 69.5 | 20.0 | 0 – 15786 | |
| Others ( | 885 | 6 (0.7%) | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0 – 246 |
Third-stage strongylid larvae identified in coprocultures of goats (expressed as mean percentage).
| Larval genus | Total (%) |
|---|---|
|
| 55.84 |
|
| 20.53 |
|
| 5.80 |
|
| 5.00 |
|
| 4.18 |
| 3.46 | |
| 3.07 | |
|
| 0.92 |
|
| 0.85 |
Prevalence of helminth infections (percentage of infected goats) in male and female goats in Northern Thailand.
| Parasitic infection | Male | Female | X2 |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | + | % | Total | + | % | |||
| Strongyles | 29 | 24 | 82.8 | 856 | 656 | 76.6 | 0.591 | 0.442 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 856 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.136 | 0.712 | |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 856 | 8 | 0.9 | 0.274 | 0.601 | |
|
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 856 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.034 | 0.854 |
| 29 | 15 | 51.7 | 856 | 430 | 50.2 | 0.025 | 0.875 | |
| 29 | 3 | 10.3 | 856 | 129 | 15.1 | 0.494 | 0.482 | |
| Others ( | 29 | 0 | 0 | 856 | 6 | 0.7 | 0.205 | 0.651 |
Total: total number of examined animals; +: number of infected animals.
Fig. 2Distribution of the number of different helminth species found in male and female goats in Northern Thailand.
Contingency table and odds ratio results for association of explanatory variables with parasites positive for fecal eggs of goats, by parasites.
| Variables | Infected/ Examined | Prevalence (%) | 95% CI | Odds Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stronglyes (%) | |||||
| Sex | 0.402 | ||||
| Female | 656/856 | 76.6 | 74.8 – 88.2 | 1.0 | |
| Male | 24/29 | 82.8 | 46.7 – 91.3 | 0.654 | |
| Body Condition Score | 0.163 | ||||
| Good | 23/30 | 76.7 | 43.2 – 87.6 | 1.0 | |
| Moderate | 613/805 | 76.1 | 73.5 – 90.3 | 0.426 | |
| Poor | 44/50 | 88.0 | 76.3 – 99.7 | 0.430 | |
| Sex | 0.511 | ||||
| Female | 129/856 | 15.1 | 10.4 – 21.8 | 1.0 | |
| Male | 3/29 | 2.3 | 1.3 – 24.9 | 0.650 | |
| Body Condition Score | 0.828 | ||||
| Good | 4/30 | 13.3 | 11.1 – 26.5 | 1.0 | |
| Moderate | 119/805 | 14.8 | 6.3 – 20.6 | 0.735 | |
| Poor | 9/50 | 18.0 | 8.1 – 27.9 | 0.799 | |
| Sex | 0.895 | ||||
| Female | 430/856 | 50.2 | 50.2 – 66.2 | 1.0 | |
| Male | 15/29 | 51.7 | 14.2 – 66.8 | 0.895 | |
| Body Condition Score | 0.009 | ||||
| good | 15/30 | 50.0b | 13.2 – 65.7 | 1.0 | |
| Moderate | 394/805 | 48.9b | 42.4 – 62.3 | 0.383 | |
| Thin | 36/50 | 72.0a | 58.2 – 85.8 | 0.372 |
Values with different letters within a column in each variable differ significantly (P ˂ 0.05)
Results from a predictive logistic regression model for parasitic infection in goats from Northern Thailand.
| Variable | Level | β | SE | Wald | OR | P-Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 1 | - | - | |||
| Female | -0.16 | 0.502 | 0.102 | 0.852 | 0.750 | 0.319 – 2.278 | |
| Body Condition Score | Good | 1 | - | - | |||
| Moderate | -0.853 | 0.718 | 1.412 | 0.426 | 0.235 | 0.104 – 1.740 | |
| Thin | -1.061 | 0.529 | 4.023 | 0.346 | 0.045 | 0.123 – 0.976 |
β: regression coefficient; SE: standard error; OR: odds ratio; CI: 95% confidence interval; *: denotes significance (P < 0.05).
Results of the fecal egg (expressed as eggs per gram, EPG) and oocyst (expressed as oocysts per gram, OPG) counts differentiated for the prevalence of gastrointestinal strongylid nematodes (GIN) (classified as negative, low, moderate and high), separated by sex and species ( expressed as % within sex or body condition score).
| Sex | Body condition score | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Poor | Moderate | Good | ||
| Gastrointestinal strongylid | nematodes | (GIN) | ||||
| Mean FECc | 455.5 ± 132.8b | 810.7 ± 46.6a | 1603.3 ± 287.2A | 751.3 ± 45.4B | 738.5 ± 202.78B | 802.1 ± 45.4 |
| Negative | 17.2 | 22.8 | 12.0 | 23.2 | 23.3 | 22.6 |
| Low (< 500 EPG) | 51.7 | 38.3 | 38.0 | 38.8 | 40.0 | 38.8 |
| Moderate (500 – 1000 EPG) | 17.2 | 13.6 | 6.0 | 14.0 | 16.7 | 13.7 |
| High (> 1000 EPG) | 13.8 | 25.4 | 44.0 | 24.0 | 20.0 | 25.0 |
| Mean FOCc | 591.1 ± 245.1 | 422.0 ± 121.8 | 172.8 ± 118.1 | 412.8 ± 124.9 | 1248.9 ± 945.8 | 427.6 ± 118.1 |
| Negative | 48.3 | 49.5 | 28.0 | 50.8 | 50.0 | 49.5 |
| Low (< 1800 OPG) | 37.9 | 47.0 | 72.0 | 45.2 | 43.3 | 46.7 |
| Moderate (1800 – 6000 OPG) | 13.8 | 2.7 | 0 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.1 |
| High (> 6000 OPG) | 0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 0.8 |
Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)
A,Bdifferent uppercase superscripts indicate statistical difference of FEC or FOC between body condition score at P < 0.05.
a,bdifferent uppercase superscripts indicate statistical difference of FEC or FOC between sex at P < 0.05.