| Literature DB >> 27766016 |
P I Zvinorova1, T E Halimani2, F C Muchadeyi3, O Matika4, V Riggio4, K Dzama5.
Abstract
A longitudinal study was conducted in low-input low-output farming systems to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasitic infections in different age groups, sex and associated risk factors in goats. A total of 580 indigenous goats were randomly selected in areas representing the five agro-ecological regions of Zimbabwe in the dry and wet seasons. Blood and faecal samples were collected from each animal and egg/oocyst per gram of faeces (epg/opg), larval culture, and packed cell volumes (PCV) were determined. Factors affecting parasitic infections were evaluated. Highest prevalence was determined for Eimeria oocysts (43%), strongyles (31%) and lower levels in trematodes and cestodes. Parasites identified were Haemonchus, Strongyloides and Oesophagostomum. Area, season, sex and age significantly influenced patterns of gastrointestinal infections (P < 0.05). Cannonical correlations indicated that parasite species composition varied by area and impacts of risk factors also differed. Risk of infection was very high for goats sampled in Natural regions (NR) I, II, III (OR = 6.6-8.2; P < 0.05) as compared to those in NR IV and V. Highest helminths and Eimeria infections were observed in the wet vs. dry season (P < 0.05). Young animals were more susceptible to parasitic infections (P < 0.05). Prevalence was higher in males than females, with odds of infection for males being almost three times to that for females (P < 0.0001). Knowledge concerning gastrointestinal helminth biology and epidemiological infection patterns caused by these parasites is essential in the development of appropriate control strategies and this has a potential to reduce production losses.Entities:
Keywords: Coccidian; Faecal floatation; Gastrointestinal tract; Helminth; Risk assessment
Year: 2016 PMID: 27766016 PMCID: PMC5063533 DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.09.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Small Rumin Res ISSN: 0921-4488 Impact factor: 1.611
Agro-ecological zones/natural regions (NR) of Zimbabwe and vegetation.
| NR | District | Rainfall (mm yr−1) | Temp (°C) | Altitude (m) | Vegetation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Chipinge | >1000 | 18.2 | >1600 | |
| II | Chipinge | 750–1000 | 18.2 | 1200–1675 | |
| III | Shurugwi | 650–800 | 17.6 | >1200 | |
| IV | Binga | 450–650 | 25.3 | 450–1050 | |
| IV | Tsholotsho | 450–650 | 20.9 | 450–1050 | |
| V | Matobo | <450 | 19.9 | 900–1200 |
Modified from (Vincent et al., 1960) and (Gambiza and Nyama, 2000).
Summary of households sampled across geographical locations.
| NR | District/area | No. of sampled animals | |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Chipinge | 30 | Mashona |
| II | Chipinge | 26 | Mashona |
| III | Shurugwi | 54 | Mashona |
| IV | Binga | 56 | Tonga |
| IV | Tsholotsho | 52 | Matabele |
| V | Matopos Research Station | 52 | Matabele |
| V | Matobo | 310 | Matabele |
| Total | 5 | 580 |
In each of the communal areas farmers kept predominant breeds together with crossbreds.
Summary statistics (mean ± SE, range) of gastrointestinal parasitic infections in goats in different areas in Zimbabwe.
| Area | Strongyles | Amphistomes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binga | 191.7 ± 45.91 | 0.2 ± 0.18 | 3.5 ± 2.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 290.6 ± 54.66 | |
| Chipinge | Mean FEC (Range) | 314.4 ± 60.78 | 0.04 ± 0.034 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.31 ± 0.29 | 41.0 ± 34.64 | 6.6 ± 6.10 | 188.3 ± 28.44 |
| Matopo | Mean FEC (Range) | 309.3 ± 43.21 | 0 | 0.2 ± 0.10 | 0.6 ± 0.59 | 5.1 ± 4.20 | 0 | 103.0 ± 39.66 |
| Shurugwi | Mean FEC (Range) | 277.8 ± 70.71 | 0.2 ± 0.11 | 9.7 ± 5.14 | 0.4 ± 0.35 | 7.3 ± 5.15 | 2.0 ± 1.75 | 263.7 ± 43.88 |
| Tsholotsho | Mean FEC (Range) | 114.0 ± 23.22 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 ± 0.35 | 2.6 ± 1.50 | 28.1 ± 26.43 | 247.8 ± 68.68 |
| Research station | Mean FEC (Range) | 56.1 ± 8.25 | 0.01 ± 0.005 | 0.2 ± 0.05 | 1.8 ± 1.00 | 0 | 1.6 ± 1.00 | 230.5 ± 25.62 |
Mean FEC: means were calculated on non-transformed faecal egg counts so as to observe the levels/intensities of infection.
Prevalence (%) of gastrointestinal parasitic infections in goats in different areas in Zimbabwe.
| Area | Binga | Chipinge | Matopo | Shurugwi | Tsholotsho | Research station |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongyles | 61.5 | 62 | 77.6 | 50.8 | 43 | 15.7 |
| 5.1 | 1.3 | 0 | 4.9 | 0 | 0.9 | |
| Amphistomes | 12.8 | 0.6 | 3.45 | 24 | 0 | 3.1 |
| 0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | |
| 0 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.4 | |
| 56.4 | 51.2 | 26.7 | 53.3 | 39.1 | 40 |
All prevalences were calculated using faecal egg counts.
Prevalence (%) for helminths and coccidian parasites by sex of goats in different areas in Zimbabwe.
| Area | Sex | Strongyles | Amphistomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binga | Male | 66.7 | 11.1 | 16.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55.6 |
| Female | 57.1 | 0 | 9.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57.1 | |
| Chipinge | Male | 63.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.4 | 0 | 48.8 |
| Female | 61.5 | 1.7 | 0.85 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 52.1 | |
| Matopo | Male | 80.7 | 0 | 5.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.6 |
| Female | 74.6 | 0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 5.1 | 0 | 28.8 | |
| Shurugwi | Male | 54 | 2 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 56 |
| Female | 48.6 | 6.9 | 28.1 | 0 | 1.4 | 0 | 51.4 | |
| Tsholotsho | Male | 38.9 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 42.4 |
| Female | 46.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 36.2 | |
| Research station | Male | 27.3 | 1.8 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 | 53.9 |
| Female | 8 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 30.7 | |
Fig. 1Rainfall patterns and mean monthly faecal egg counts for goats in all agro-ecological regions in Zimbabwe (There was no sampling in March, August and December), FECs for Fasciola spp., Amphistomes, Trichuris spp., Moniezia spp. were very low, hence the shape of the graph.
Least squares means ± S.E. by season and sex for different ages for packed red cell volume (PCV (%)) logarithm transformed faecal egg counts (LFEC) for helminths/coccidian oocysts and geometric mean of faecal egg counts (GFEC (EPG)).
| Age/yrs | Trait | Season | Sex | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | Wet | Male | Female | ||
| 1 | PCV | 25.7 ± 0.59 | 26.7 ± 0.77 | 24.9 ± 0.60 | 27.5 ± 0.71 |
| 1.7 ± 0.03 | 2.1 ± 0.05 | 2.0 ± 0.03 | 1.9 ± 0.04 | ||
| LCOCCIDIA | 2.2 ± 0.04 | 1.8 ± 0.05 | 2.1 ± 0.04 | 1.9 ± 0.05 | |
| GFEC | 94 | 203 | 223 | 153 | |
| 2 | PCV | 27.2 ± 0.57 | 30.1 ± 0.86 | 27.4 ± 0.68 | 30.0 ± 0.69 |
| LFEC | 1.8 ± 0.03 | 2.2 ± 0.05 | 2.0 ± 0.03 | 1.9 ± 0.04 | |
| LCOCCIDIA | 1.9 ± 0.04 | 1.8 ± 0.06 | 1.9 ± 0.05 | 1.8 ± 0.05 | |
| GFEC | 89 | 252 | 307 | 153 | |
| 3 | PCV | 27.9 ± 0.58 | 28.0 ± 0.80 | 28.7 ± 0.82 | 27.3 ± 0.55 |
| LFEC | 1.8 ± 0.03 | 2.1 ± 0.04 | 2.0 ± 0.04 | 1.9 ± 0.03 | |
| LCOCCIDIA | 1.8 ± 0.04 | 1.9 ±0.06 | 1.9 ± 0.05 | 1.8 ± 0.04 | |
| GFEC | 135 | 257 | 171 | 201 | |
| 4 | PCV | 27.3 ± 0.60 | 28.5 ± 0.83 | 28.0 ± 0.82 | 27.9 ± 0.60 |
| LFEC | 1.8 ± 0.03 | 1.9 ±0.06 | 2.1 ± 0.04 | 1.9 ± 0.03 | |
| LCOCCIDIA | 1.9 ± 0.04 | 1.9 ± 0.06 | 2.0 ± 0.06 | 1.8 ± 0.04 | |
| GFEC | 76 | 281 | 167 | 133 | |
| 5 | PCV | 26.9 ± 0.90 | 29.5 ± 1.63 | 28.1 ± 1.65 | 28.2 ± 0.88 |
| LFEC | 1.8 ± 0.04 | 1.9 ± 0.09 | 1.8 ± 0.09 | 1.8 ± 0.05 | |
| LCOCCIDIA | 1.8 ± 0.06 | 2.1 ± 0.12 | 2.1 ± 0.12 | 1.9 ± 0.06 | |
| GFEC | 69 | 277 | 57 | 127 | |
| 6 | PCV | 25.7 ± 1.72 | 27.1 ± 2.32 | 26.7 ± 1.80 | 26.2 ± 2.23 |
| LFEC | 1.8 ± 0.09 | 2.6 ± 0.12 | 2.4 ± 0.09 | 2.0 ± 0.12 | |
| LCOCCIDIA | 2.1 ± 0.12 | 1.7 ± 0.16 | 2.2 ± 0.13 | 1.6 ± 0.16 | |
| GFEC | 32 | 289 | 157 | 59 | |
Infection with all the investigated parasites except coccidian oocysts. LFEC includes all helminthes infection.
Odds ratio estimates and confidence limits for fixed factors affecting gastrointestinal parasite infection.
| Effect | Odds Ratio | 95% Wald Confidence limit | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||
| Area | 23.562 | 10.904 | 52.746 | |
| Sex | 0.365 | 0.286 | 0.467 | |
| Age | 9.001 | 4.195 | 19.709 | |
| Month | 2.106 | 0.187 | 23.989 | |
P < 0.05.
P < 0.001.