Literature DB >> 35601509

Uneven global and racial representation in major orthopaedic clinical trials: Trends over a decade.

Jaiben George1, Deepak Gautam1, PonAravindhan A Sugumar1, Ritvik Janardhanan1, Apoorva Kabra1, Rajesh Malhotra1.   

Abstract

Background: The presence of geographic and demographic disparities in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may affect the external validity of trials. While some studies have addressed racial or ethnic disparities, they have been limited to a certain region, and there is limited information about the global representation in orthopaedic research.
Methods: RCTs published in major medical and orthopaedic journals from 2010 to 2019 were identified. After screening 6961 articles, 1769 trials enrolling 323,506 patients were included. The details of individual trials such as the country of origin, the proportion of women, and the proportion of different racial groups were recorded. Factors associated with reporting and representation of specific demographic groups, and annual changes were assessed.
Results: Majority of the trials were from were from United States (US) (N = 380, 21.5%). US (30.7%, N = 99,356), United Kingdom (15.7%, N = 50,691) and Canada (8.3%, N = 26,890) accounted for majority of the enrolled patients. 59.1% of the patients were women. Among US trials reporting race, 81.2% were White, and 9.9% were African American. There was no significant variation in the global distribution (p = 0.056), percentage of women (p = 0.811), or percentage of Whites (p = 0.389) over the years.
Conclusion: The top three countries contributed to about 55% of the enrolled patients, whereas they contributed to only 6% of the world population. Overall, women appeared to be adequately represented in the trials, while racial minorities were underrepresented. There has not been any considerable improvement in the representation of developing regions or minorities over the last decade.
© 2022 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disparity; Gender; Minority; Race; Trials

Year:  2022        PMID: 35601509      PMCID: PMC9120236          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  23 in total

1.  External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 1-7       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Causes and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission After Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopy: An Analysis of 15,167 Cases.

Authors:  Robert W Westermann; Andrew J Pugely; Zachary Ries; Annunziato Amendola; Christopher T Martin; Yubo Gao; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Complications for racial and ethnic minority groups after total hip and knee replacement: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Adrian D Kenny; Elena Losina; Lori B Chibnik; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Utilization Rate, Hospital Volume, and Perioperative Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Stephen Lyman; Carla Boutin-Foster; Michael L Parks; Ting-Jung Pan; Alexis Lan; Yan Ma
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results.

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Lukas Staub; Emin Aghayev; Thomas Zweig; Thomas Barz; Jean-Claude Theis; Albert Chavanne; Dieter Grob; Max Aebi; Christoph Roeder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Readmission, Reoperation, and Complications: Total Hip vs Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jaiben George; Morad Chughtai; Anton Khlopas; Alison K Klika; Wael K Barsoum; Carlos A Higuera; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 8.  Lack of diversity in orthopaedic trials conducted in the United States.

Authors:  Jeremy S Somerson; Mohit Bhandari; Clayton T Vaughan; Christopher S Smith; Boris A Zelle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Postoperative Complications Following Orthopedic Spine Surgery: Is There a Difference Between Men and Women?

Authors:  Jessica H Heyer; N A Cao; Richard L Amdur; Raj R Rao
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

10.  Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ryan W Paul; Donghoon Lee; Joseph Brutico; Fotios P Tjoumakaris; Michael G Ciccotti; Kevin B Freedman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.