Literature DB >> 35601446

Catalyst-free decarboxylation of 4-hydroxycinnamic acids: efficient synthesis of 4-vinylphenols.

Qian Yang1, Youjuan Li2,3, Huanhuan Liu2,3, Enhua Wang1, Mei Peng2,3, Tingfei Deng2,3, Xiong Pan2,3, Zhongsheng Luo2,3, Yanfang Yan2,3, Lishou Yang2,3, Xiaosheng Yang2,3.   

Abstract

We report herein an efficient protocol for the synthesis of 4-vinylphenols by a catalyst-free decarboxylation of trans-4-hydroxycinnamic acids. A variety of 4-vinylphenols has been synthesized in moderate to excellent yields. This protocol also features no polymerization.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4-hydroxycinnamic acids; 4-vinylphenols; catalyst-free; decarboxylation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35601446      PMCID: PMC9043707          DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  R Soc Open Sci        ISSN: 2054-5703            Impact factor:   3.653


Introduction

4-Vinylphenols are of both natural and biological interest. They are part of a large number of significant natural products such as 4-vinylphenol, 4-vinylcatechol, 2,6-dimethoxy-4-vinylphenol and many others [1-5]. Most of these compounds display varied bioactivities such as anti-oxidant [6-10], anti-mutagenic [9], anti-fungal [11] and anti-cancer [12-14] properties (figure 1). They are also building blocks in the synthesis of bioactive compounds [15-17]. In addition, they are widely used in industry [18]. Therefore, the synthesis of 4-vinylphenols has gained widespread attention.
Figure 1

Selected bioactive 4-vinylphenols.

Selected bioactive 4-vinylphenols. However, the susceptibility of the hydroxy function toward polymerization often results in the formation of polymers [19]. To overcome this barrier chemical [20-27] and biological [28-32] protocols have been developed, but most of them suffer from narrow substrate scope. To the best of our knowledge, the most efficient synthetic routes reported for the preparation of 4-vinylphenols involve (i) piperidine-catalysed Knoevenagel–Doebner [20] and Knoevenagel reaction [21] from 4-hydroxybenzaldeydes and malonic acid (scheme 1a); (ii) decarboxylation of 4-hydroxycinnamic acids using DBU [22], [C2C1Im][OAc] [23] or Bacillus subtilis [28] (scheme 1b). But these methods only test 4-hydroxycinnamic acids bearing electron-donating groups (EDG) [20-23,28] and suffer some disadvantages such as the use of a base catalyst (Stamford/Joshi/Setti/Singh's work), the addition of polymerization inhibitor (Setti's work), need of microwave-assisted (Joshi/Setti's work) and long reaction times (Stamford/Kourist's work). Several catalyst-free decarboxylation methods of cinnamic acids have been reported, however, they need using some sort of biocatalysts [29,33,34].
Scheme 1

The most efficient approaches for the synthesis of 4-vinylphenols.

The most efficient approaches for the synthesis of 4-vinylphenols. Herein, we report an efficient procedure for the preparation of 4-vinylphenols from trans-4-hydroxycinnamic acids by a catalyst-free decarboxylative reaction without any additive (scheme 1c). This approach tolerates 4-hydroxycinnamic acids bearing electron-donating/withdrawing groups and containing substituents on the double bond. Additionally, it can effectively inhibit the polymerization in the absence of inhibitor.

Results and discussion

Our initial studies were carried out with readily available 4-hydroxycinnamic acid 1a as a test substrate. 1a in DMF was stirred at 200°C for 60 min under an air atmosphere to give the desired product 2a in 15% yield (table 1, entry 1). To further improve the reaction yield, control experiment was performed. To our delight, we found that decreasing the reaction time to 30 or 40 min had obvious effect on the reaction (table 1, entries 2–3). However, a decrease in the yield was observed upon further decreasing the reaction time (table 1, entry 4). Subsequently, we investigated the effect of solvents on the efficiency of the decarboxylation. Unfortunately, the reaction performed in DMA, ethylene glycol, DMSO, 1,4-dioxane or DCE exerted detrimental effect on the yield (table 1, entries 5–9). We tried to lower the temperature but failed. The reaction was conducted under microwave irradiation at 100°C, yielding 2a only in 45% yield (table 1, entry 10). Therefore, the optimized reaction conditions were determined as 1a (0.2 mmol) in DMF (1 ml) at 200°C for 30 min under an air atmosphere (table 1, entry 3). With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, a gram scale reaction was carried out and provided the product 2a in 87% yield (table 1, entry 11).
Table 1

Optimization of the reaction conditions.a

entrytime (min)solventyield 2a (%)b
160DMF15
240DMF85
330DMF89
420DMF77
530DMA23
630ethylene glycol61
730DMSO30
8301,4-dioxane/
930DCE/
10c30DMF45
11d30DMF87

aReaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), solvent (1 ml).

bIsolated yield.

cReaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), solvent (1 ml), under microwave irradiation at 100°C.

dReaction conditions: 1a (7 mmol), solvent (25 ml).

Optimization of the reaction conditions.a aReaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), solvent (1 ml). bIsolated yield. cReaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), solvent (1 ml), under microwave irradiation at 100°C. dReaction conditions: 1a (7 mmol), solvent (25 ml). Under the optimized conditions, the scope of this decarboxylation was then examined by varying 4-hydroxycinnamic acids 1 (table 2). It is apparent from table 2 that 4-vinylphenols bearing electron-donating/withdrawing groups were prepared in excellent yields (86–96%) and no polymers were detected under the given conditions. Specifically, we investigated the decarboxylation of some natural products such as p-coumaric acid (1a), caffeic acid (1b), ferulic acid (1c) and sinapinic acid (1d), achieving corresponding 4-vinylphenols in excellent yields (2a–2d). Meanwhile, employing methyl- or ethoxy-substituted 4-hydroxycinnamic acids (1e–1g) also afforded the products in high yields (2e–2g). However, electron-withdrawing group (NO2, F, Cl or Br) gave lower yields (2 h–2l). Moreover, 4-hydroxycinnamic acids containing methyl on the double bond (1p and 1q) were also compatible with the current conditions, providing the corresponding products 2p and 2q in moderate yields (68% and 63%). The products 2p and 2q exist in the E forms, based on their NMR spectra and in accordance with literature report [35]. Next, we tested several cinnamic acids without 4-hydroxyl substituent under the optimized reaction conditions. Unfortunately, no corresponding vinylbenzenes were detected (scheme 2).
Table 2

Evaluation of substrate scope.a

entrysubstrates 1temp. (oC)products 2yield (%)b
120089
220087
320094
417094
518090
613093
720096
816086
914087
1018086
1114089
1214087
1320068
1420063

aReaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), DMF (1 ml).

bIsolated yield.

Scheme 2

Decarboxylation of cinnamic acids without 4-hydroxyl substituent.

Decarboxylation of cinnamic acids without 4-hydroxyl substituent. Evaluation of substrate scope.a aReaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), DMF (1 ml). bIsolated yield. In addition, we found that the polymerization product 2aa was isolated in 48% yield when the reaction time and temperature were increased (table 3, 2aa). Subsequently, we tested another two substrates bearing electron-donating/withdrawing group (table 3, 1f and 1l). Moderate yields were obtained. Obviously, for electron-withdrawing group (Br) substituted substrate, related polymer was got in higher yield (table 3, 2ff versus 2ll).
Table 3

Synthesis of 4-vinylphenol dimers.a

entrysubstratestemp. (oC)dimersyield (%)b
122048
220050
317067

aReaction conditions: 1a/1f/1 l (0.2 mmol), DMF (1 ml).

bIsolated yield.

Synthesis of 4-vinylphenol dimers.a aReaction conditions: 1a/1f/1 l (0.2 mmol), DMF (1 ml). bIsolated yield. Plausible mechanisms for the decarboxylation and polymerization of 4-hydroxycinnamic acids are depicted in scheme 3. Species 3 is formed under elevated reaction temperature. Finally, hydrogen transfer followed by release of a molecule of carbon dioxide ensures the formation of 4-vinylphenol 2a. Radical polymerization of styrene initiated at higher reaction temperature, yielding intermediate 6 followed by expelling hydrogen radical leads to the polymerization product 2aa.
Scheme 3

Plausible mechanism for the decarboxylation and polymerization.

Plausible mechanism for the decarboxylation and polymerization.

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed an efficient method for the preparation of 4-vinylphenols via a catalyst-free decarboxylation of 4-hydroxycinnamic acids. This method features good functional group tolerance and no polymerization. However, corresponding polymers were obtained in moderate yields when under harsher reaction conditions.

Experimental section

General information

Unless otherwise noted, all reagents, catalysts and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel (200–300 mesh). Melting points were determined using a X-4 melting point apparatus with microscope. The IR spectra were recorded with Mattson FTIR spectrometer 5000. Absorption maxima were measured in cm−1. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were achieved on a Bruker Avance 600 MHz spectrometer (1H 600 MHz; 13C 151 MHz; 19F 565 MHz) in CDCl3, CD3OD, DMF-d, DMSO-d6. High-resolution mass spectra were measured on a ThermoFish QE Focus facility. Thin-layer chromatographies were done on pre-coated silica gel 60F254 plates (Merck).

General procedure for the synthesis of 4-vinylphenols (2a–2l and 2p–2q)

Procedure for 4-vinylphenols bearing electron-donating groups (2a–2g and 2p)

To a stirred solution of DMF (1 ml) was added 4-hydroxycinnamic acids (1a–1g and 1p) (0.2 mmol) in 5 ml pressure-resistant reaction bottle. The reaction mixture was stirred at 130–200°C until the completion of the starting materials as monitored by TLC (30 min). The reaction mixture was quenched with water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting crude compound was purified by silica gel column chromatography to yield the pure product (2a–2g and 2p), which was dissolved immediately in methanol for storage.

4-Vinylphenol 2a

Light yellow solid, yield 89%, mp 72–74°C. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3328, 3019, 2924, 2850, 1609, 1228, 834.1 H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.29–7.23 (m, 2H), 6.72 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.60 (dd, J = 17.6, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (dd, J = 17.6, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 5.03 (dd, J = 10.9, 0.8 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 157.78, 136.86, 128.77, 127.89, 115.79, 111.12. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C8H9O: 121.06479; found, 121.06487.

2-Hydroxy-4-vinylphenol 2b

Light yellow oil, yield 87%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3346, 2929, 1604, 1524, 1281, 1111, 815. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.94 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (dd, J = 17.6, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (dd, J = 17.6, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (dd, J = 10.9, 0.8 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CD3OD) δ 145.16, 144.98, 136.75, 130.03, 118.31, 114.82, 112.21, 109.34. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C8H9O2: 137.05971; found, 137.05946.

2-Methoxy-4-vinylphenol 2c

Colourless oil, yield 94%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3411, 2924, 2852, 1603, 15 141 463, 1269, 817. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.95–6.91 (m, 2H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (dd, J = 17.5, 10.8 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (s, 1H), 5.59 (d, J = 17.5 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 146.59, 145.64, 136.63, 130.28, 120.08, 114.35, 111.47, 108.01, 55.89. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C9H11O2: 151.07536; found, 151.07515.

2,6-Dimethoxy-4-vinylphenol 2d

Yellow oil, yield 94%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3144, 2938, 2844, 1605, 1462, 1213, 1115, 837. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.65 (s, 2H), 6.61 (dd, J = 17.5, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.60 (d, J = 17.5 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (s, 1H), 5.15 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 147.06, 136.83, 134.76, 129.18, 111.87, 102.9, 56.26. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C10H13O3: 181.08592; found, 181.08562.

2-Ethoxy-4-vinylphenol 2e

White solid, yield 90%, mp 125–127°C. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3436, 2979, 2929, 1606, 1513, 1237, 1122, 823. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.99 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (dd, J = 17.6, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (d, J = 17.6 Hz, 1H), 5.04 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CD3OD) δ 146.77, 146.59, 136.73, 129.95, 119.41, 114.84, 110.25, 109.67, 64.19, 13.76. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C10H13O2: 165.09101; found, 165.09073.

2-Methyl-4-vinylphenol 2f

Yellow oil, yield 93%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3375, 2922, 2850, 1599, 1461, 1267, 822. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMF-d) δ 7.24 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (dd, J = 17.6, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.60 (dd, J = 17.6, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 5.01 (dd, J = 10.9, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 2.18 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMF-d) δ 158.04, 141.10, 133.70, 133.70, 130.49, 129.88, 121.53, 116.99, 34.39. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M-H]− calcd. for C9H9O: 133.06479; found, 133.06454.

2,6-Dimethyl-4-vinylphenol 2g

Yellow oil, yield 96%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3436, 2924, 2853, 1600, 1202, 1148, 871. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.05 (s, 2H), 6.59 (dd, J = 17.6, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (d, J = 17.6 Hz, 1H), 5.08 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (s, 1H), 2.25 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.09, 136.46, 129.90, 126.59, 122.97, 111.16, 15.91. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C10H13O: 149.09609; found, 149.09592.

(E)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propene 2p

Colourless oil, yield 68%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3388, 2964, 2927, 1615, 1558, 1507, 1457, 1239, 853.03, 688. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.24–7.20 (m, 2H), 6.80–6.77 (m, 2H), 6.35 (dd, J = 15.7, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.09 (dq, J = 15.7, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 1.87 (dd, J = 6.6, 1.7 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.77, 130.75, 130.32, 127.04, 123.36, 115.39, 18.39. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M-H]− calcd. for C9H9O: 133.06479; found, 133.06425.

Procedure for 4-vinylphenols bearing electron-withdrawing groups (2h–2l and 2q)

To a stirred solution of DMF (1 ml) was added 4-hydroxycinnamic acids (1h–1l and 1q) (0.2 mmol) in 5 ml pressure-resistant reaction bottle. The reaction mixture was stirred at 140–200°C until the completion of the starting materials as monitored by TLC (30 min). The reaction mixture was quenched with water and extracted with dichloromethane. The dichloromethane layer was washed with pure water 2–3 times. The combined extract was dried over Na2SO4. The filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the pure product (2h–2l and 2q), which was dissolved immediately in methanol for storage.

2-Nitro-4-vinylphenol 2h

Yellow oil, yield 86%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3418, 2925, 2853, 1627, 1536, 1322, 1260, 802. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.57 (s, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (dd, J = 17.6, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.73 (d, J = 17.5 Hz, 1H), 5.32 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.59, 134.85, 134.11, 130.53, 122.42, 120.16, 114.96. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C8H8O3N: 166.04987; found, 166.04968.

2-Fluoro-4-vinylphenol 2i

Colourless oil, yield 87%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3436, 2924, 2852, 1612, 1094. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.15 (dd, J = 11.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.96–6.93 (m, 1H), 6.59 (dd, J = 17.5, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.61–5.58 (m, 1H), 5.56 (s, 1H), 5.17 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.15(237.72), 143.30(14.33), 135.46(2.19), 131.14(6.21), 123.03(2.74), 117.18, 112.80(18.79). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M-H]− calcd. for C8H6OF: 137.03972; found, 137.03989.

2-Chloro-4-vinylphenol 2j

Yellow oil, yield 86%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3498, 2923, 2850, 1619, 1261, 1099, 804. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.38 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.98–6.96 (m, 1H), 6.59 (dd, J = 17.5, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.61 (d, J = 17.5 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 5.18 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.92, 135.10, 131.60, 126.61, 126.36, 120.08, 116.21, 113.03. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M-H]− calcd. for C8H6OCl: 153.01017; found, 153.01038.

2-Bromo-4-vinylphenol 2k

Colourless oil, yield 89%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3425, 2919, 2850, 1602, 1126, 618. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52 (s, 1H), 7.28 (s, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (dd, J = 17.5, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.61 (d, J = 17.5 Hz, 1H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 5.17 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.85, 134.94, 132.01, 129.65, 127.08, 116.03, 113.06, 110.44. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C8H8OBr: 198.97530; found, 198.97460.

3-Bromo-4-vinylphenol 2l

Colourless oil, yield 87%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3405, 2925, 2850, 1605, 1228, 873, 596. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.44 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (dd, J = 17.4, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (d, J = 17.4 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (s, 1H), 5.24 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.74, 135.03, 130.23, 127.48, 123.87, 119.45, 115.08, 114.62. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C8H8OBr: 198.97530; found, 198.97508.

(E)-1-(2-chloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)propene 2q

Colourless oil, yield 63%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3390, 2962, 2931, 2848, 1605, 1493, 1435, 1252, 1222, 1041, 963, 903, 854, 824, 691. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.38 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 6.73–6.68 (m, 2H), 6.11 (dq, J = 15.7, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 1.92 (dd, J = 6.6, 1.8 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.89, 132.80, 128.83, 127.44, 126.66, 126.60, 116.23, 114.48, 18.70. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M-H]− calcd. for C9H8OCl: 106.02582; found, 168.02541.

General procedure for the synthesis of 4-vinylphenol dimers (2aa/2ff/2ll)

To a stirred solution of DMF (1 ml) were added 4-hydroxycinnamic acids 1a/1f/1l (0.2 mmol) in 5 ml pressure-resistant reaction bottle. The reaction mixture was stirred at 170–220°C until the completion of the starting materials as monitored by TLC (2 h). The reaction mixture was quenched with water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting crude compound was purified by silica gel column chromatography and dried by vacuum freeze-drying, affording the pure dimer (2aa/2ff/2ll). The pure product was dissolved immediately in methanol for storage.

Dimer 2aa

Light yellow oil, yield 48%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3328, 3021, 2962, 1610, 15 121 233,1171, 834. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.23 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.81–6.74 (m, 4H), 6.31 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (dd, J = 15.9, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (s, 1H), 4.74 (s, 1H), 3.55 (p, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.41 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.69, 153.82, 138.13, 133.54, 130.63, 128.42, 127.56, 127.43, 115.37, 115.23, 41.64, 21.40. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C16H17O2: 241.12231; found, 241.12279.

Dimer 2ff

Light yellow oil, yield 50%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3416, 2960, 2921, 1611, 15 021 263,1114, 814. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.09 (s, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (s, 1H), 6.90 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (dd, J = 15.1, 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.25 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (dd, J = 15.8, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (s, 2H), 3.46 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 1.39 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CD3OD) δ 142.81, 141.78, 127.48, 123.49, 120.83, 120.65, 119.76, 119.27, 116.87, 116.30, 116.17, 116.06, 107.50, 107.46, 43.85, 25.47, 20.29, 20.21. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M-H]− calcd. for C18H19O2: 267.13796; found, 267.13870.

Dimer 2ll

Light yellow oil, yield 67%. IR (KBr plate): νmax 3405, 2965, 2923, 1603, 1485, 1228, 1209, 875. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.40 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.69–6.64 (m, 1H), 6.17 (dd, J = 15.8, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (s, 2H), 4.10–4.00 (m, 2H), 1.41 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CD3OD) δ 157.24, 156.27, 134.86, 134.08, 128.48, 128.34, 127.15, 127.09, 123.58, 123.02, 118.98, 118.68, 114.85, 114.80, 40.22, 19.49. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M-H]− calcd. for C16H13Br2O2: 394.92768; found, 394.92844.
  15 in total

1.  Isolation, identification, and structure of a potent alkyl-peroxyl radical scavenger in crude canola oil, canolol.

Authors:  Daisuke Wakamatsu; Shigeru Morimura; Tomohiro Sawa; Kenji Kida; Chiaki Nakai; Hiroshi Maeda
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.043

2.  Efficient synthesis of hydroxystyrenes via biocatalytic decarboxylation/deacetylation of substituted cinnamic acids by newly isolated Pantoea agglomerans strains.

Authors:  Upendra K Sharma; Nandini Sharma; Richa Salwan; Rakesh Kumar; Ramesh C Kasana; Arun K Sinha
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.638

3.  Antioxidant activity of various fractions of non-tannin phenolics of canola hulls.

Authors:  R Amarowicz; M Naczk; F Shahidi
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.279

4.  Radical Cation Diels-Alder Reactions by TiO2 Photocatalysis.

Authors:  Kaii Nakayama; Naoya Maeta; Genki Horiguchi; Hidehiro Kamiya; Yohei Okada
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 6.005

5.  Catalyst-free decarboxylation of 4-hydroxycinnamic acids: efficient synthesis of 4-vinylphenols.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Youjuan Li; Huanhuan Liu; Enhua Wang; Mei Peng; Tingfei Deng; Xiong Pan; Zhongsheng Luo; Yanfang Yan; Lishou Yang; Xiaosheng Yang
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.653

6.  Dietary polyphenol canolol from rapeseed oil attenuates oxidative stress-induced cell damage through the modulation of the p38 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Xia; Xia Xiang; Fenghong Huang; Mingming Zheng; Renhuai Cong; Ling Han; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  4-Vinylphenol production from glucose using recombinant Streptomyces mobaraense expressing a tyrosine ammonia lyase from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  Ryosuke Fujiwara; Shuhei Noda; Yoshifumi Kawai; Tsutomu Tanaka; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.461

8.  4-Vinyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol (canolol) suppresses oxidative stress and gastric carcinogenesis in Helicobacter pylori-infected carcinogen-treated Mongolian gerbils.

Authors:  Xueyuan Cao; Tetsuya Tsukamoto; Takahiro Seki; Harunari Tanaka; Shigeru Morimura; Liyu Cao; Tsutomu Mizoshita; Hisayo Ban; Takeshi Toyoda; Hiroshi Maeda; Masae Tatematsu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Protective effect of canolol from oxidative stress-induced cell damage in ARPE-19 cells via an ERK mediated antioxidative pathway.

Authors:  Xin Dong; Zhongrui Li; Wei Wang; Wenjie Zhang; Shuizhong Liu; Xiaomei Zhang; Jun Fang; Hiroshi Maeda; Makoto Matsukura
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  Canolol inhibits gastric tumors initiation and progression through COX-2/PGE2 pathway in K19-C2mE transgenic mice.

Authors:  Donghui Cao; Jing Jiang; Tetsuya Tsukamoto; Ruming Liu; Lin Ma; Zhifang Jia; Fei Kong; Masanobu Oshima; Xueyuan Cao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Catalyst-free decarboxylation of 4-hydroxycinnamic acids: efficient synthesis of 4-vinylphenols.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Youjuan Li; Huanhuan Liu; Enhua Wang; Mei Peng; Tingfei Deng; Xiong Pan; Zhongsheng Luo; Yanfang Yan; Lishou Yang; Xiaosheng Yang
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.653

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.