| Literature DB >> 35601077 |
Daniela-Elena Gheoca Mutu1,2, Adelaida Avino2,3, Andra-Elena Balcangiu-Stroescu4,5, Mihai Mehedințu2, Daniela Gabriela Bălan4, Lăcrămioara Aurelia Brîndușe6, Ana-Maria Popescu7, Dorin Ionescu8,9, Bogdan-Mihai Cristea1, Luminiţa Florentina Tomescu10, Cristian-Radu Jecan2,3, Laura Răducu2,3.
Abstract
Malignant melanoma is a melanocytic neoplasm with a steadily increasing incidence worldwide. In order to define a proper diagnostic protocol and to establish an accurate prognostic method for the disease, specific biomarkers are of notable importance. Their contribution is also significant in the treatment of melanoma for the improvement of newer and more targeted therapeutic approaches. To emphasize the importance of specific immune markers in the diagnosis of melanoma, immunohistochemical analysis was performed on 56 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cutaneous melanomas. Besides the traditional prognostic factors, depth of invasion and mitotic rate, the markers tested in the present study were S100 protein family, Melan A, Ki67 and HMB-45. The present results indicated that immunocytochemistry represents a valuable test in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant melanoma and each biomarker had different associations with the progression and prognosis of the disease. Patients with S100 expression were 4.83 times (95% CI=1.2-20.8) more likely to suffer a relapse, whereas patients with a Ki67 expression of >30% had a 5.41-fold higher risk (95% CI=1.3-22.0). The correlation between S100 and the Breslow depth was statistically significant (r-value: 0.43; P=0.027). In addition, the importance of a multidisciplinary team including a plastic surgeon, anatomopathologist and oncologist was highlighted. Copyright: © Gheoca Mutu et al.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; evaluation; immunohistochemistry; melanoma; prognosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35601077 PMCID: PMC9115627 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Patient characteristics.
| Patient characteristics | RELAPSING (N=11) N (%) | NON-RELAPSING (N=45) N (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) average ± SD | 58.2±16.7 | 57.8±15.2 | 0.826 |
| Sex |
| ||
| Male | 10 (90.9) | 24 (53.3) | |
| Female | 1 (9.1) | 21 (46.7) | |
| Comorbidities | |||
| Hypertension | 6 (54.5) | 18 (40.0) | 0.382 |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 1 (9.1) | 6 (13.3) | 0.703 |
| Cardiopathies | 3 (27.3) | 9 (20.0) | 0.335 |
| Venous insufficiency | 3 (27.3) | 6 (13.3) | 0.259 |
| Other cancer types | 1 (9.1) | 7 (15.6) | 0.832 |
| Surgical history | 7 (63.6) | 19 (42.2) | 0.351 |
| Smoking | 3 (27.3) | 12 (26.7) | 0.973 |
| Alcohol use | 5 (45.5) | 17 (37.8) | 0.640 |
| Long-term use of drugs | 5 (45.5) | 21 (46.7) | 0.942 |
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%).
Immunological and histopathological characteristics and their association with relapse.
| Patient characteristic | Relapsing (n=11) | Non-relapsing (n=45) | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Localization of melanoma | ||||
| Head | 7 (63.6) | 12 (26.7) | 4.81 (1.2-19.4) | 0.027 |
| Trunk | 0 (0.0) | 17 (37.8) | 0.08 (0.0-1.3) | 0.072 |
| Limbs | 4 (36.4) | 16 (35.6) | 1.04 (0.3-4.1) | 0.960 |
| Lymph node metastases | 6 (54.5) | 10 (22.2) | 4.20 (1.1-16.7) | 0.041 |
| Capsular invasion | 10 (90.0) | 24 (53.4) | 8.75 (1.1-74.2) | 0.047 |
| Immunophenotyping | ||||
| HMB-45 | 1 (9.1) | 15 (33.3) | 0.20 (0.1-1.7) | 0.111 |
| S100 | 8 (72.8) | 16 (35.6) | 4.83 (1.2-20.8) | 0.034 |
| Melan A | 3 (27.3) | 14 (31.1) | 0.83 (0.2-3.6) | 0.804 |
| Ki67 | 5.41 (1.3-22.0) | 0.018 | ||
| <30% | 4 (36.4) | 34 (75.6) | ||
| >30% | 7 (63.6) | 11 (24.4) | ||
| Tumoral foci | 1.3±1.7 | 0.8±2.1 | 0.32 (-1.9-0.9) | 0.467 |
| Histological subtype | ||||
| Lentiginous | 2 (18.2) | 8 (17.8) | 1.02 (0.2-5.7) | 0.975 |
| Nodular | 1 (9.1) | 17 (37.8) | 0.16 (0.1-1.4) | 0.092 |
| Superficial spreading | 3 (27.3) | 14 (31.1) | 0.83 (0.2-3.6) | 0.804 |
| Acrallentiginous | 5 (45.5) | 5 (11.1) | 6.67 (1.5-30.1) | 0.013 |
| Others | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.2) | 1.29 (0.1-33.8) | 0.878 |
| Mitoses | 9.0±3.7 | 5.7±4.3 | (-6.1-0.5) | 0.023 |
| Breslow depth | 9.2±6.1 | 3.5±2.3 | (-7.9-3.4) | <0.001 |
| Ulcerations | 2 (18.2) | 16 (35.6) | 0.40 (0.1-2.1) | 0.279 |
| Clark level | 2.8±1.5 | 3.1±1.3 | (-0.6-1.2) | 0.508 |
Values are expressed as n (%) or the mean ± standard deviation. OR, odds ratio.
Figure 1Representative histology images of nodular melanoma. (A) Scale bar, 500 µm; (B) scale bar, 200 µm; (C) scale bar, 20 µm. Asymmetric, well-delimitated lesions with a nodule-like appearance; atypical melanocytes do not extend to the lateral sides related to the dermal component. They exhibit a vertical growth pattern, with an invasive nature. The epidermal component consists of epithelioid melanocytes with abundant clear cytoplasm and large vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli and high mitotic rates.
Figure 2Representative histology images of superficial spreading melanoma. (A) Scale bar, 200 µm; (B) scale bar, 100 µm; (C) scale bar, 50 µm. Proliferation of voluminous atypical epithelioid melanocytes assembled into clusters, having the tendency of nested growth throughout distinct levels of the epidermis. Paget-like pattern.
Figure 3Representative histology images of lentiginous melanoma. (A) Scale bar, 100 µm; (B) scale bar, 50 µm. Radial growth-phase melanoma with lentiginous proliferation of atypical epithelioid melanocytes assembled singularly or into small cellular areas forming nests with focal pagetoid spread. Small fusiform melanocytes with a relatively lower amount of cytoplasm and barely noticeable nuclei; variable degrees of fibrosis and inflammation present (scale bars, 100 and 50 µm in the left and right panel, respectively).
Figure 4Representative immunohistochemical staining images for the biomarkers. (A) S100 (magnification, x20); (B) Ki67 (magnification, x10); (C) HMB-45 (magnification, x10); and (D) Melan A (magnification, x20).