| Literature DB >> 35599639 |
A Lektemur Alpan1, G Torumtay Cin1, Ö Özmen2, M F Doğan3, Y Şahin3.
Abstract
Introduction: Favipiravir and Vitamin C (Vit C) were used together in the treatment of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the effects of favipiravir on the periodontium are still unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Favipiravir and Vit C treatment on alveolar bone metabolism. Experimental: Fifty healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (2-3 months old) were randomly divided into five equal groups (n = 10): Control, Favi 20, Favi 100, Favi 20+Vit C, Favi 100+Vit C. Favipiravir (20 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg, i.m.) and Vit C (150 mg/kg/day, oral) were administered to the rats for 14 days. Alveolar bone loss (ABL) and histopathological changes were examined using a light microscope. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine levels of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), caspase-3, bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP-2) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in the bone tissues.Entities:
Keywords: Alveolar bone loss; BMP-2; Caspase-3; Favipiravir; RANKL; Vitamin C; bone formation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35599639 PMCID: PMC9109666 DOI: 10.1134/S0022093022020119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Evol Biochem Physiol ISSN: 0022-0930 Impact factor: 1.621
Fig. 1.Representative histopathological images of the alveolar bones in studied rat groups. P = pulp; D = dentin, CEJ = cement-enamel junction; ABC = alveolar bone crest. Arrows indicate distance between the CEJ and ABC (ABL). HE staining. Scale bars = 200 µm.
Fig. 2.Mean alveolar bone loss (ABL) in the studied groups.
Fig. 3.Graphic representation of the levels of immunoreactivity of proteins of interest in the analyzed groups. The data were presented by box and whisker plots, displaying the median, interquartile range, minimum, and maximum. ALP—* p < 0.05, Control vs Favi 20, Favi 100 and, Favi 20+Vit C. BMP-2—* p < 0.05, Control vs Favi 20; ** p < 0.05, Favi 20 vs Favi 20+Vit C and Favi 100+Vit C. Caspase-3—* p < 0.05 Control vs Favi 100 and Favi 100+Vit C; ** p < 0.05 Favi 20+Vit C vs Favi 100. RANKL—* p < 0.05 Control vs Favi 100.
IHC optical density (OD) scores between the groups
| Control | Favi 20 | Favi 100 | Favi 20+Vit C | Favi 100+Vit C | |
| ALP | 2.11 ± 0.65 | 1.08 ± 0.38 | 0.74 ± 0.19a,c | 1.66 ± 0.82 | 1.06 ± 0.45 |
| BMP-2 | 2.26 ± 0.81 | 1.47 ± 0.37a | 1.25 ± 0.31a,c | 1.85 ± 0.13 | 1.55 ± 0.16c |
| Caspase-3 | 0.50 ± 0.22 | 1.44 ± 0.39a | 2.53 ± 0.27a | 1.12 ± 0.23c | 1.47 ± 0.10a |
| RANKL | 0.44 ± 0.07 | 0.98 ± 0.10a | 1.84 ± 0.11a | 0.90 ± 0.29 | 0.71 ± 0.08d |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The differences between the groups carrying different letters are statistically significant, p < 0.05. a—Compared to Control; b—compared to Favi 20; c—compared to Favi 20+Vit C; d—compared to Favi 100.
Fig. 4.Representative images of immunoexpression of proteins of interests in studied rat groups. Arrows indicate the presence of proteins of interest. Streptavidin biotin peroxidase method. Scale bars = 200 µm.