Yan Xuan1, Ping Gao1, Ying Shen1, Sujie Wang1, Xi Gu1, Dou Tang1, Xun Wang1, FanFan Zhu1, Leiqun Lu2, Ling Chen3. 1. Institute and Department of Endocrinology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 2. Institute and Department of Endocrinology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. llqlzy@163.com. 3. Institute and Department of Endocrinology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. lwnfm17@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the association between hypertriglyceridemic waist (HTGW) phenotype and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in a middle- to older-aged Chinese population. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 9015 participants (age 40-79 years) were recruited and grouped into four phenotypes, as follows: NWNT: normal waist-normal triglyceride; NWET: normal waist-elevated triglycerides; EWNT: elevated waist-normal triglycerides; and hypertriglyceridemic waist (HTGW). Logistic regression analysis was carried out to assess the associations between HTGW phenotype and NAFLD. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the utility of waist circumference-triglyceride index (WTI) as a reference factor for screening for NAFLD. RESULTS: HTGW phenotype had a higher prevalence of NAFLD (53.3%), diabetes (19.6%), and hypertension (79.8%) than the other three subgroups. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, HTGW phenotype was associated with NAFLD (odds ratio (OR) 6.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.11-7.32). Further adjusted for potential confounders, the HTGW phenotype was still significantly associated with NAFLD (adjusted OR 5.18; 95% CI 4.30-6.23) regardless of gender. The subgroup analyses generally revealed similar associations across all subgroups. ROC curve analysis showed that when the maximum area under the curve was 0.748, the WTI was 90.1, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 90.6 and 59.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HTGW phenotype is strongly associated with NAFLD and can be used as a reference factor for NAFLD screening.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the association between hypertriglyceridemic waist (HTGW) phenotype and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in a middle- to older-aged Chinese population. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 9015 participants (age 40-79 years) were recruited and grouped into four phenotypes, as follows: NWNT: normal waist-normal triglyceride; NWET: normal waist-elevated triglycerides; EWNT: elevated waist-normal triglycerides; and hypertriglyceridemic waist (HTGW). Logistic regression analysis was carried out to assess the associations between HTGW phenotype and NAFLD. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the utility of waist circumference-triglyceride index (WTI) as a reference factor for screening for NAFLD. RESULTS: HTGW phenotype had a higher prevalence of NAFLD (53.3%), diabetes (19.6%), and hypertension (79.8%) than the other three subgroups. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, HTGW phenotype was associated with NAFLD (odds ratio (OR) 6.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.11-7.32). Further adjusted for potential confounders, the HTGW phenotype was still significantly associated with NAFLD (adjusted OR 5.18; 95% CI 4.30-6.23) regardless of gender. The subgroup analyses generally revealed similar associations across all subgroups. ROC curve analysis showed that when the maximum area under the curve was 0.748, the WTI was 90.1, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 90.6 and 59.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HTGW phenotype is strongly associated with NAFLD and can be used as a reference factor for NAFLD screening.
Authors: Chris Estes; Quentin M Anstee; Maria Teresa Arias-Loste; Heike Bantel; Stefano Bellentani; Joan Caballeria; Massimo Colombo; Antonio Craxi; Javier Crespo; Christopher P Day; Yuichiro Eguchi; Andreas Geier; Loreta A Kondili; Daniela C Kroy; Jeffrey V Lazarus; Rohit Loomba; Michael P Manns; Giulio Marchesini; Atsushi Nakajima; Francesco Negro; Salvatore Petta; Vlad Ratziu; Manuel Romero-Gomez; Arun Sanyal; Jörn M Schattenberg; Frank Tacke; Junko Tanaka; Christian Trautwein; Lai Wei; Stefan Zeuzem; Homie Razavi Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Susan Sam; Steven Haffner; Michael H Davidson; Ralph B D'Agostino; Steven Feinstein; George Kondos; Alfonso Perez; Theodore Mazzone Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-07-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Giovanni Musso; Roberto Gambino; James H Tabibian; Mattias Ekstedt; Stergios Kechagias; Masahide Hamaguchi; Rolf Hultcrantz; Hannes Hagström; Seung Kew Yoon; Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya; Jacob George; Francisco Barrera; Svanhildur Hafliðadóttir; Einar Stefan Björnsson; Matthew J Armstrong; Laurence J Hopkins; Xin Gao; Sven Francque; An Verrijken; Yusuf Yilmaz; Keith D Lindor; Michael Charlton; Robin Haring; Markus M Lerch; Rainer Rettig; Henry Völzke; Seungho Ryu; Guolin Li; Linda L Wong; Mariana Machado; Helena Cortez-Pinto; Kohichiroh Yasui; Maurizio Cassader Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Ana Paula Grotti Clemente; Bárbara Dal Molin Netto; Joana Pereira de Carvalho-Ferreira; Raquel Munhoz da Silveira Campos; Aline de Piano Ganen; Lian Tock; Marco Túlio de Mello; Ana Raimunda Dâmaso Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr Date: 2015-12-31