Literature DB >> 35596113

An innovative and convenient technique to reduce anastomotic leakage after double stapling anastomosis: laparoscopic demucositized suture the overlapping point of the "dog ear" area.

Xiaojiang Yi1, Weilin Liao1, Xiaochuang Feng1, Hongming Li1, Zhaoyu Chen1, Jiahao Wang1, Xinquan Lu1, Jin Wan1, Jiaxin Lin1, Xiaoyan Hong2, Dechang Diao3.   

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in the treatment of colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate an innovative and convenient technique of laparoscopic demucositized suture the overlapping point of the "dog ear" area after the double stapling anastomosis (lds-DSA), as an improved alternative for conventional DSA, and whether it could reduce the AL rate in laparoscopic anterior resection (Lapa-AR). Between January 2018 and December 2020, a total of 245 patients who underwent Lapa-AR for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon or rectal cancer were divided into the lsd-DSA group (n = 99) and the DSA group (n = 146). Data were analyzed retrospectively. Morbidity, AL rate and other perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidity, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, tumor size, stage, and other operative details were comparable between the two groups. There was no difference in surgical time between the two groups (196.41 ± 76.71 vs. 182.39 ± 49.10 min, p = 0.088). The overall complication rate was also without a difference (11/99, 11.11% vs. 21/146, 14.38%, p = 0.456), but AL rate significantly lower in the lsd-DSA group than in the DSA group (2/99, 2.02% vs. 12/146, 8.22%, p = 0.040). For other perioperative outcomes, the lsd-DSA group shortened the total and postoperative hospital stay, and the time to pull out drainage tube than in the DSA group. Our comparative study demonstrates lds-DSA to have a better short-term outcome in reducing AL compared with DSA. This technique could be an alternative approach to maximize the patients' benefit in Lapa-AR.
© 2022. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Double stapling anastomosis; Laparoscopic anterior resection; Laparoscopic demucositized suture; “Dog ear” area

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35596113     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01282-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  48 in total

1.  Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Masashi Ueno; Yosuke Fukunaga; Satoshi Nagayama; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  High risk of permanent stoma after anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Jutesten; J Draus; J Frey; G Neovius; G Lindmark; P Buchwald; M L Lydrup
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  K C M J Peeters; R A E M Tollenaar; C A M Marijnen; E Klein Kranenbarg; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients.

Authors:  Chien Yuh Yeh; Chung Rong Changchien; Jeng-Yi Wang; Jinn-Shiun Chen; Hong Hwa Chen; Jy-Ming Chiang; Reiping Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Walker; Stephen W Bell; Matthew J F X Rickard; Daniel Mehanna; Owen F Dent; Pierre H Chapuis; E Leslie Bokey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Peter Matthiessen; Olof Hallböök; Jörgen Rutegård; Göran Simert; Rune Sjödahl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Consequences of anastomotic leak after restorative proctectomy for cancer: effect on long-term function and quality of life.

Authors:  Jean H Ashburn; Luca Stocchi; Ravi P Kiran; David W Dietz; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  Adverse Effects of Anastomotic Leakage on Local Recurrence and Survival After Curative Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuanhu Wang; Jingjing Liu; Shan Wang; Hongyun Zhao; Sitang Ge; Wenbin Wang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after lower rectal Cancer resection, including drain type: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Tetsushi Kinugasa; Sachiko Nagasu; Kenta Murotani; Tomoaki Mizobe; Takafumi Ochi; Taro Isobe; Fumihiko Fujita; Yoshito Akagi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.