Literature DB >> 35594402

Long-term experimental evolution decouples size and production costs in Escherichia coli.

Dustin J Marshall1, Martino Malerba2, Thomas Lines1,3, Aysha L Sezmis1, Chowdhury M Hasan1, Richard E Lenski4,5, Michael J McDonald1.   

Abstract

Body size covaries with population dynamics across life’s domains. Metabolism may impose fundamental constraints on the coevolution of size and demography, but experimental tests of the causal links remain elusive. We leverage a 60,000-generation experiment in which Escherichia coli populations evolved larger cells to examine intraspecific metabolic scaling and correlations with demographic parameters. Over the course of their evolution, the cells have roughly doubled in size relative to their ancestors. These larger cells have metabolic rates that are absolutely higher, but relative to their size, they are lower. Metabolic theory successfully predicted the relations between size, metabolism, and maximum population density, including support for Damuth’s law of energy equivalence, such that populations of larger cells achieved lower maximum densities but higher maximum biomasses than populations of smaller cells. The scaling of metabolism with cell size thus predicted the scaling of size with maximum population density. In stark contrast to standard theory, however, populations of larger cells grew faster than those of smaller cells, contradicting the fundamental and intuitive assumption that the costs of building new individuals should scale directly with their size. The finding that the costs of production can be decoupled from size necessitates a reevaluation of the evolutionary drivers and ecological consequences of biological size more generally.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Damuth’s law; cell size; metabolic ecology; metabolic scaling

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35594402      PMCID: PMC9173777          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2200713119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  38 in total

1.  Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling.

Authors:  J Kozłowski; M Konarzewski; A T Gawelczyk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The predator-prey power law: Biomass scaling across terrestrial and aquatic biomes.

Authors:  Ian A Hatton; Kevin S McCann; John M Fryxell; T Jonathan Davies; Matteo Smerlak; Anthony R E Sinclair; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Declining body size: a third universal response to warming?

Authors:  Janet L Gardner; Anne Peters; Michael R Kearney; Leo Joseph; Robert Heinsohn
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Experimental rejection of a nonadaptive explanation for increased cell size in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J A Mongold; R E Lenski
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Size-abundance rules? Evolution changes scaling relationships between size, metabolism and demography.

Authors:  Martino E Malerba; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  The evolution of bacterial cell size: the internal diffusion-constraint hypothesis.

Authors:  Romain Gallet; Cyrille Violle; Nathalie Fromin; Roula Jabbour-Zahab; Brian J Enquist; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Do larger individuals cope with resource fluctuations better? An artificial selection approach.

Authors:  Martino E Malerba; Maria M Palacios; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Changes in Cell Size and Shape during 50,000 Generations of Experimental Evolution with Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Nkrumah A Grant; Ali Abdel Magid; Joshua Franklin; Yann Dufour; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Eco-energetic consequences of evolutionary shifts in body size.

Authors:  Martino E Malerba; Craig R White; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Zachary D Blount; Christina Z Borland; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.