Literature DB >> 29143436

Eco-energetic consequences of evolutionary shifts in body size.

Martino E Malerba1, Craig R White1, Dustin J Marshall1.   

Abstract

Size imposes physiological and ecological constraints upon all organisms. Theory abounds on how energy flux covaries with body size, yet causal links are often elusive. As a more direct way to assess the role of size, we used artificial selection to evolve the phytoplankton species Dunaliella tertiolecta towards smaller and larger body sizes. Within 100 generations (c. 1 year), we generated a fourfold difference in cell volume among selected lineages. Large-selected populations produced four times the energy than small-selected populations of equivalent total biovolume, but at the cost of much higher volume-specific respiration. These differences in energy utilisation between large (more productive) and small (more energy-efficient) individuals were used to successfully predict ecological performance (r and K) across novel resource regimes. We show that body size determines the performance of a species by mediating its net energy flux, with worrying implications for current trends in size reduction and for global carbon cycles.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; artificial selection; evolutionary size shift; experimental evolution; geometric biology; metabolism; net energy flux; primary production; scaling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29143436     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  5 in total

1.  Do larger individuals cope with resource fluctuations better? An artificial selection approach.

Authors:  Martino E Malerba; Maria M Palacios; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Long-term experimental evolution decouples size and production costs in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Dustin J Marshall; Martino Malerba; Thomas Lines; Aysha L Sezmis; Chowdhury M Hasan; Richard E Lenski; Michael J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Size-based ecological interactions drive food web responses to climate warming.

Authors:  Max Lindmark; Jan Ohlberger; Magnus Huss; Anna Gårdmark
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Solving the grand challenge of phenotypic integration: allometry across scales.

Authors:  François Vasseur; Adrianus Johannes Westgeest; Denis Vile; Cyrille Violle
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 1.633

5.  Reduced phenotypic plasticity evolves in less predictable environments.

Authors:  Christelle Leung; Marie Rescan; Daphné Grulois; Luis-Miguel Chevin
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 9.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.