| Literature DB >> 35592300 |
Maryam Mohammadi-Cheraghabadi1, Seyed Ali Mohammad Modarres-Sanavy1, Fatemeh Sefidkon2, Ali Mokhtassi-Bidgoli1, Saeid Hazrati3.
Abstract
A 2-year (2017-2018) field experiment was performed to specify if the foliar application of putrescine (PUT) under optimum and water-deficit stress (WDS) conditions would favorably affect leaf gas exchange, greenness, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, pigments, sodium (Na), potassium (K), as well as yield and content of the essential oil (EO) relationships in Salvia officinalis L. (sage) in spring (cutting 1) and summer (cutting 2). Based on the results analysis of variance, the effects of WDS, PUT, and cutting time were significant for the dry weight, leaf area index (LAI), EO content, EO yield, chlorophyll (Chl) t, carotenoid, Na, and K of sage. According to regression results, the response of EO content, EO yield, non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), spad, Chl a, Chl t, K, and K/Na to WDS can be expressed by a quadratic model, indicating that they would attain their maximum in 75.5%, 34.86%, 38.33%, 84.13% 60%, 70%, 50.40%, and 40.28% available soil water depletion (ASWD), respectively. The response of dry weight, LAI, EO content, EO yield, Fv/Fm, spad, ΦpsII, Chl a, Chl b, Chl t, carotenoid, K, and K/Na to PUT can be expressed by a quadratic model, showing that they would attain their most under 0.98, 1.14, 1.34, 1.16, 1.27, 1.18, 1.17, 1.25, 1.17, 1.27, 1.31, 1.21, and 1.19 mM of PUT, respectively. These findings suggest that, probably, the functions and structures of the photosynthetic system were further enhanced with PUT, thereby they can be promoting primary electron transfer in PSII. Also, stomatal and photosynthetic activity improved with increasing K levels with PUT.Entities:
Keywords: Pearson's correlation; cutting; potassium; stomatal conductance and sage
Year: 2022 PMID: 35592300 PMCID: PMC9094464 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2741
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 3.553
Main effect of cutting time on dry weight, leaf area index (LAI), endogenous PUT (Endo PUT), essential oil (EO) content, essential oil (EO) yield, Fv/Fm, NPQ, photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), spad, chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll t (Chl t), Carotenoid, Na, K, and K/Na of Salvia officinalis
| Some dependent traits | Cutting time | |
|---|---|---|
| Cutting 1 | Cutting 2 | |
| Dry weight (g/m2) | 101.56b | 284.53a |
| LAI | 0.5b | 0.7a |
| Endo PUT (nmol/g FW) | 224.43a | 64.32b |
| EO content (%) | 1.37a | 1.15b |
| EO yield (g/m2) | 135.76b | 323.69a |
| Fv/Fm | 0.48b | 0.74a |
| NPQ | 0.31b | 0.81a |
| Pn (μmol/m2 s−1) | 14.88a | 11.05b |
| Gs (mmol/m2 s−1) | 0.05a | 0.03b |
| Chl a (mg g−1 FW) | 0.08a | 0.06b |
| Chlo t (mg g−1 FW) | 0.17a | 0.14b |
| Carotenoid (mg g−1 FW) | 0.77a | 0.63b |
| Na (mg/g DM) | 12.96b | 16.81a |
| K (mg/g DM) | 94.78a | 67.02b |
| K/Na | 7.98a | 4.24b |
FIGURE 1Main effect of water‐deficit stress and PUT on dry weight (a, b) and LAI (c, d). The different letters show significant difference at the level of 0.05. The error bars represent standard error
FIGURE 2Main effect of water‐deficit stress and PUT on essential oil (EO) content (a, b) and EO yield (c, d). The different letters show significant difference at the level of 0.05. The error bars represent standard error
FIGURE 3Main effect of water‐deficit stress on Pn (a), Gs (b), Fv/Fm (c), and NPQ (d) and the main effect of PUT on Fv/Fm (e) and ΦpsII (f). The different letters show significant difference at the level of 0.05. The error bars represent standard error
FIGURE 4Main effect of water‐deficit stress and PUT on Chl a (a, b), Chl b (c, d), Chl t (e, f), and carotenoid (g, h). The different letters show significant difference at the level of 0.05. The error bars represent standard error
FIGURE 5Main effect of water‐deficit stress and PUT on Na (a, b), K (c, d) and K/Na (e, f) contents. The different letters show significant difference at the level of 0.05. The error bars represent standard error