| Literature DB >> 35591597 |
Wenqi Fu1,2, Shuang Liu1,2, Jun Jiao1,2, Zhiwen Xie3, Xinfang Huang3, Yun Lu1,2, Huiying Liu1,2, Shuhai Hu1,2, Enjun Zuo1,2, Ni Kou1,2, Guowu Ma1,2.
Abstract
Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys have been widely used as dental-restoration materials for many years. This study sought to investigate whether selective laser melting (SLM) is a more appropriate process than traditional casting (CAST) for fabricating dental Co-Cr alloys. Metallurgical microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Vickers hardness and nanoindentation tests, and friction and wear tests were used to evaluate the microstructure, surface compositions, mechanical properties, and wear resistance, respectively. Additionally, the biocompatibilities and cell adhesion of the alloys were evaluated with L-929 fibroblasts via CCK-8 assay, Live/Dead staining, flow cytometric analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation and real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assay. The XPS results showed that the two alloys were all mainly comprised of Co, Cr, and O. The hardness in the CAST group equaled 7.15 ± 0.48 GPa, while in the SLM group, it equaled 9.06 ± 0.49 GPa. The friction coefficient of SLM alloys remained at approximately 0.46, but the CAST specimens fluctuated significantly. SLM alloys exhibited shallower wear scars and less wear debris compared with CAST alloys, simultaneously. Additionally, there were higher survival and expression of cell-adhesion-related genes on SLM alloys of L-929 cells, which meant that the deleterious effect on L-929 cells was significantly reduced compared with that for the CAST alloys. Overall, the wear resistances and biocompatibilities of the Co-Cr dental alloys were dramatically affected by the fabrication technique. The SLM technique is advantageous over the CAST technique for fabricating Co-Cr dental alloys.Entities:
Keywords: biocompatible; casting technics; cobalt–chromium alloys; dental restoration wear; selective laser melting
Year: 2022 PMID: 35591597 PMCID: PMC9104588 DOI: 10.3390/ma15093263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the experimental procedure.
Primers’ sequences used in this study.
| Target Gene | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | AGGAGCGAGACCCCACTAACA | AGGGGGGCTAAGCAGTTGGT |
| VEGF | AGGAGTACCCCGACGAGATAGA | CACATCTGCTGTGCTGTAGGAA |
| Col-1 | CACGGCTGTGTGCGATGA | TCGCCCTCCCGTCTTTG |
Figure 2Metallurgical-microscopy images of the Co-Cr alloys produced via (a) CAST and (b) SLM.
Figure 3XPS spectra of the Co-Cr alloys.
Figure 4Fitting results of Co 2p and Cr 2p high-resolution spectra of the Co-Cr alloys: (a) Co 2p (CAST); (b) Cr 2p (CAST); (c) Co 2p (SLM); (d) Cr 2p (SLM).
Figure 5Mechanical properties of the Co-Cr alloys: (a) Nanohardness, elastic modulus and Vickers hardness; (b) Load–displacement curves (** p < 0.01).
Figure 6Friction coefficient curves.
Figure 7Metallurgical-microscopy images of the wear scars: (a) CAST and (b) SLM.
Figure 8CCK-8 assay of L-929 cells cultured on the samples for 1, 3, and 5 d (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 9Fluorescence images of L-929 cells cultured on the samples for 24 h (a,b,e,f) and 48 h (c,d,g,h) via Live/Dead staining, indicating live cells (green) and dead ones (red): (a–d) CAST and (e–h) SLM.
Figure 10Annexin Ⅴ-FITC/PI staining and flow-cytometry analysis of L-929 cells cultured in different extracts for 48 h: (a) control; (b) CAST; (c) SLM; (d) cell apoptosis rates (** p < 0.01).
Figure 11FE-SEM images of L-929 cells after culturing on CAST samples for 3 d (a–c) and 5 d (g–i), and on SLM samples for 3 d (d–f) and 5 d (j–l). The images obtained at higher magnification are taken from the areas enclosed by a square in the images taken at lower magnification.
Figure 12Adhesion-related gene expressions of L-929 cells cultured on the samples: (a) VEGF, (b) Col-I (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).