| Literature DB >> 34947150 |
Muhammad Imam Ammarullah1,2, Ilham Yustar Afif1,2, Mohamad Izzur Maula1,2, Tri Indah Winarni2,3,4, Mohammad Tauviqirrahman1, Imam Akbar5, Hasan Basri5, Emile van der Heide6, J Jamari1,2.
Abstract
The selection of biomaterials for bearing in total hip arthroplasty is very important to avoid various risks of primary postoperative failure for patients. The current investigation attempts to analyze the Tresca stress of metal-on-metal bearings with three different materials, namely, cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo), stainless steel 316L (SS 316L), and titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V). We used computational simulations using a 2D axisymmetric finite element model to predict Tresca stresses under physiological conditions of the human hip joint during normal walking. The simulation results show that Ti6Al4V-on-Ti6Al4V has the best performance to reduce Tresca stress by 45.76% and 39.15%, respectively, compared to CoCrMo-on-CoCrMo and SS 316L-on-SS 316L.Entities:
Keywords: Tresca stress; metal-on-metal; normal walking activity; total hip arthroplasty
Year: 2021 PMID: 34947150 PMCID: PMC8703798 DOI: 10.3390/ma14247554
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Geometric parameters for bearing components.
| Parameter | Size (mm) |
|---|---|
| Femoral head diameter | 28 |
| Radial clearance | 0.05 |
| Acetabular cup thickness | 5 |
Material properties for metallic materials.
| Material | Young’s Modulus (GPA) | Poisson’s Ratio (-) |
|---|---|---|
| CoCrMo | 210 | 0.3 |
| SS 316L | 193 | 0.3 |
| Ti6Al4V | 110 | 0.3 |
Coefficient of friction for different materials of metal-on-metal.
| Bearings | Coefficient of Friction (-) |
|---|---|
| CoCrMo-on-CoCrMo | 0.2 |
| SS 316L-on-SS 316L | 0.8 |
| Ti6Al4V-on-Ti6Al4V | 1 |
Figure 1Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty model for finite element analysis.
Figure 2Gair loading based on normal walking condition [3].
Figure 3Maximum Tresca stress for different metal-on-metal bearing materials in full cycle.
Figure 4Comparison of highest, average, and lowest Tresca stress of metal-on-metal bearings materials on under normal walking condition.
Maximum Tresca stress for different metal-on-metal bearing materials at peak loading.
| Bearing Material | Tresca Stress (MPa) |
|---|---|
| CoCrMo-on-CoCrMo | 55.84 |
| SS 316L-on-SS 316L | 53.31 |
| Ti6Al4V-on-Ti6Al4V | 38.31 |
Figure 5Tresca stress distribution on the acetabular cup for different metal-on-metal bearing materials at selected phases.
Figure 6Tresca stress profile as a function of acetabular cup thickness for different metal-on-metal bearing materials at peak loading.
Figure 7Tresca stress profile as a function of acetabular cup thickness for different metal-on-metal bearing materials at selected phases.