Literature DB >> 35589827

Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship.

Amber Hye-Yon Lee1,2,3, Yphtach Lelkes4, Carlee B Hawkins5, Alexander G Theodoridis6.   

Abstract

The dominant narrative among scholars and political pundits characterizes American partisanship as overwhelmingly negative, portraying citizens as more repelled by the opposing party than attached to their own party. To assess the valence of partisan identity, we use various measures collected from several new and existing nationally representative surveys and behavioural outcomes obtained from two experiments. Our findings consistently depart from the negative partisanship narrative. For the majority of Americans, partisanship is either equally positive and negative or more positive than negative. Only partisan leaners stand out as negative partisans. We pair these observational findings with experimental data that differentiate between positive group behaviour and negative group behaviour in the partisan context. We find that the behavioural manifestations of party identity similarly include both positive and negative biases in balance, reinforcing our conclusion that descriptions of partisanship as primarily negative are exaggerated.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35589827     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01348-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  11 in total

Review 1.  Intergroup bias.

Authors:  Miles Hewstone; Mark Rubin; Hazel Willis
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Us versus them: social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm.

Authors:  Mina Cikara; Matthew M Botvinick; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26

3.  Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: reactions to intergroup difference.

Authors:  A Mummendey; M Wenzel
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  1999

4.  The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes.

Authors:  Amy J C Cuddy; Susan T Fiske; Peter Glick
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-04

5.  "In-group love" and "out-group hate" as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: a new game paradigm.

Authors:  Nir Halevy; Gary Bornstein; Lilach Sagiv
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-04

6.  Signaling when no one is watching: A reputation heuristics account of outrage and punishment in one-shot anonymous interactions.

Authors:  Jillian J Jordan; David G Rand
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-04-15

Review 7.  With malice toward none and charity for some: ingroup favoritism enables discrimination.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; Thomas F Pettigrew
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2014-03-24

8.  Political sectarianism in America.

Authors:  Eli J Finkel; Christopher A Bail; Mina Cikara; Peter H Ditto; Shanto Iyengar; Samara Klar; Lilliana Mason; Mary C McGrath; Brendan Nyhan; David G Rand; Linda J Skitka; Joshua A Tucker; Jay J Van Bavel; Cynthia S Wang; James N Druckman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lees; Mina Cikara
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-11-11

10.  "Ingroup love" and "outgroup hate" in intergroup conflict between natural groups.

Authors:  Ori Weisel; Robert Böhm
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  'Them' without 'us': negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil.

Authors:  João Areal
Journal:  Political Res Exch       Date:  2022-09-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.