| Literature DB >> 35586384 |
Maoquan Li1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer has become a major disease affecting people's health because of its insidiousness, rapid progression and poor prognosis. Based on the practical needs of clinical work, combined with domestic multi-center research and experience, this guideline provides constructive suggestions for the interventional treatment of pancreatic cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced pancreatic carcinoma; Clinical practice guidelines; Interventional treatment
Year: 2021 PMID: 35586384 PMCID: PMC8947992 DOI: 10.1016/j.jimed.2021.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Interv Med ISSN: 2590-0293
Staging definitions of pancreatic cancer according to the eighth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system,.
| The AJCC (eighth edition) staging definitions for pancreatic cancer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Details | Stage | T | N | M |
| T1 Maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm | 0 | Tis | N0 | M0 |
| IA | T1 | N0 | M0 | |
| IB | T2 | N0 | M0 | |
| IIA | T3 | N0 | M0 | |
| IIB | T1~3 | N0 | M0 | |
| III | T4 | Any N | M0 | |
| Any T | N2 | M0 | ||
| IV | Any T | Any N | M1 | |
Parameters and related parameters of radiofrequency and microwave treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Number of needles and choice of surgical approach
| Electrode type | Quantity | spacing | Target energy | Power setting | Treatment length | Treatment diameter | Treatment volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T20 | 1 | 9 | 20 | 22 | 20 | 5 | ||
| T20 | 2 | 7 | 14 | 40 | 25 | 27 | 20 | 7 |
| T20 | 3 | 15 | 24 | 60 | 25 | 30 | 30 | 12 |
| T30 | 1 | 15 | 30 | 32 | 22 | 5.5 | ||
| T30 | 2 | 13 | 25 | 60 | 35 | 25 | 8 | |
| T30 | 3 | 15 | 15–35 | 90 | 35 | 20–30 | 14 | |
| T40 | 1 | 29 | 40 | 44 | 25 | 14 | ||
| T40 | 2 | 13.3 | 39 | 80 | 45 | 33 | 25 | 19 |
| T40 | 3 | 20 | 35–70 | 120 | 50 | 30–40 | 22 | |
| T40 | 3 | 25 | 70–130 | 120 | 55 | 40–50 | 47 | |
| T40 | 3 | 30 | 130–225 | 120 | 60 | 50–60 | 87 | |
Interventional options for advanced pancreatic cancer.
| cTAI treatment | Low/undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, rich blood supply, genetically sensitive ROBO3↑/miR-250b↓, etc. |
| Pancreatic head: gastroduodenal artery, superior mesenteric artery | |
| Pancreatic body and tail: short splenic artery, right gastroepiploic artery | |
| Dominant artery: chemoembolization; non-dominant artery: embolization | |
| Physiotherapy | Medium/highly differentiated adenocarcinoma, insufficient blood supply, genetic insensitivity ROBO3↓/miR-250b↑etc. |
| Pancreatic head: 125 I seed implantation | |
| Body tail: radiofrequency/microwave ablation |
Fig. 1Individualized physical therapy options.
Comparison of general information of the three groups of patients before treatment.
| variable | Control group | c TAI group | c TAI Joint Group | total | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 66.31 ± 11.76 | 68.11 ± 13.08 | 66.84 ± 13.17 | 67.24 ± 12.46 | 0.167 |
| gender | |||||
| Male, n (%) | 115(53.5) | 150(71.4) | 105(56.8) | 370(60.7) | 0.068 |
| Female, n (%) | 100 (46.5) | 60(28.6) | 80(43.2) | 240(39.3) | |
| TNM staging | |||||
| T3N1M 0, n (%) | 28(13.0) | 21(10.0) | 17(9.1) | 66(10.8) | 0.651 |
| T3N1M 1, n (%) | 187(87.0) | 189(90.0) | 168(90.9) | 544(89.2) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | |||||
| <3.0, n (%) | 3(1.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 3(0.5) | 0.252 |
| 3.0–5.0, n (%) | 2(0.9) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 2(0.3) | |
| >5.0, n (%) | 210(98.8) | 210(100.0) | 185(100.0) | 605(99.2) | |
| With or without transfer | |||||
| Yes, n (%) | 190(88.4) | 182(86.7) | 148(80.0) | 520(86.2) | 0.651 |
| None, n (%) | 25(11.6) | 28(13.3) | 37(20.0) | 90(13.8) | |
| ascites | |||||
| Yes, n (%) | 17(7.9) | 5(2.4) | 7(3.8) | 29(4.8) | 0.014 |
| None, n (%) | 198(92.1) | 205(97.6) | 178(96.2) | 581(95.2) | |
| jaundice | |||||
| Yes, n (%) | 45(20.9) | 110(52.4) | 20(10.8) | 175(28.7) | 0.000 |
| None, n (%) | 170(79.1) | 100(47.6) | 165(89.2) | 435(71.3) | |
| Child-Pugh classification | |||||
| A, n (%) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0.003 |
| B, n (%) | 48(22.3) | 62(29.5) | 94(50.8) | 204(33.4) | |
| C, n (%) | 121(77.7) | 148(70.5) | 91(49.2) | 406(66.6) | |
| CA199 | |||||
| Normal, n (%) | 43(20.0) | 51(24.3) | 40(21.6) | 134(22.0) | 0.774 |
| Abnormal, n (%) | 172(80.0) | 159(75.7) | 145(78.4) | 476(78.0) |
Note:Control group: conventional intravenous chemotherapy; cTAI group: continuous intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy; cTAI combined group: continuous intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with physical therapy (including particles, radiofrequency, and microwave treatment of primary and metastatic lesions).
Fig. 2OS curve, log-rank test P = 0.000.
mRECIST analysis
Comparison of clinical remission rates among the three groups.
| mRECIST | Control group | c TAI | c TAI Joint Group | total | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR + PR, n (%) | 38(17.7) | 88(41.9) | 88(47.5) | 214(35.1) | 0.000 |
| SD, n (%) | 103(47.9) | 70(33.3) | 51(27.6) | 224(36.7) | |
| PD, n (%) | 74(34.4) | 52(24.8) | 46(24.9) | 172(28.2) |
Comparison of survival rates between the three groups at 6 months.
| ending | Control group | c TAI group | c TAI Joint Group | total | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival, n (%) | 76(35.3) | 160(76.2) | 162(87.6) | 398(65.2) | 0.000 |
| Death, n (%) | 139(64.5) | 50(23.8) | 23(12.4) | 212(34.8) |
Comparison of survival rates between the three groups at 12 months.
| ending | Control group | c TAI group | c TAI Joint Group | total | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival,n (%) | 21(9.7) | 51(24.3) | 92(49.7) | 164(26.9) | 0.000 |
| Death,n (%) | 194(90.3) | 159(75.7) | 93(50.3) | 446(73.1) |
Comparison of survival rates between the three groups at 18 months.
| ending | Control group | c TAI group | c TAI Joint Group | total | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival,n (%) | 8(3.7) | 23(11.0) | 43(23.2) | 74(12.1) | 0.001 |
| Death, n (%) | 207(96.3) | 187(89.0) | 142(76.8) | 536(87.9) |