| Literature DB >> 35585765 |
Zhe Wu1, Zhangfeng Huang1, Yi Qin1, Wenjie Jiao1.
Abstract
The number of minimally invasive surgeries, such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, has increased enormously in recent years. More and more relevant studies report that anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy has the same effect as traditional lobectomy in the surgical treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (diameter less than 2.0 cm). Segmentectomy requires sufficient knowledge of the location of the pulmonary nodules, as well as the anatomy of the target segments, blood vessels, and bronchi. With the rapid development of imaging technology and three-dimensional technology, three-dimensional reconstruction has been widely used in the medical field. It can effectively assess the vascular branching patterns, discover the anatomic variations of the blood vessels and bronchi, determine the location of the lesion, and clarify the division of the segments. Therefore, it is helpful for preoperative positioning, surgical planning, preoperative simulation and intraoperative navigation, and provides a reference for formulating an individualized surgical plan. It therefore plays a positive role in anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy. This study reviews the progress made in three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction in anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy.Entities:
Keywords: lung cancer; pulmonary segmentectomy; three-dimensional computed tomography; three-dimensional reconstruction
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35585765 PMCID: PMC9250838 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorac Cancer ISSN: 1759-7706 Impact factor: 3.223
FIGURE 1Trachea and bronchi reconstruction
FIGURE 2Pulmonary lesion reconstruction
FIGURE 3Pulmonary artery and vein reconstruction
FIGURE 4Lung reconstruction
FIGURE 53D reconstruction model
The advantages of the 3D group compared with the non‐3D group
| 3D group | Non‐3D group | |
|---|---|---|
| Operation time (minute) | ||
| Liu et al. | 115.5 ± 37.2 | 133.0 ± 35.7 |
| Qiu et al. | 116.1 ± 30.7 | 125.1 ± 23.6 |
| She et al. | 141.9 ± 29.1 | 160.9 ± 31.5 |
| Xue et al. | 111 | 139 |
| Intraoperative bleeding (ml) | ||
| Liu et al. | 75.1 ± 57.4 | 106.3 ± 70.8 |
| Qiu et al. | 20.9 ± 12.2 | 18.2 ± 12.2 |
| She et al. | 96.4 ± 47.5 | 131.7 ± 48.5 |
| Postoperative hospital stay (days) | ||
| Liu et al. | 4.5 ± 1.7 | 5.1 ± 1.8 |
| Complication | ||
| Postoperative hemoptysis | ||
| Liu et al. | 2.6% (1/39) | 13.2% (7/53) |
| Hemoptysis | ||
| She et al. | 1.9% (1/51) | 15.6% (8/51) |
| Pulmonary air leakage | ||
| She et al. | 3.9% (2/51) | 19.6% (10/51) |
| Postoperative drainage (ml) | ||
| She et al. | 425.4 ± 163.5 | 664.7 ± 245.6 |
| Chest tube duration (days) | ||
| She et al. | 2.7 ± 1.0 | 4.2 ± 1.6 |
| Recurrence | ||
| Lin et al. | 2% (2/99) | 11.5% (21/182) |