| Literature DB >> 35585561 |
Peng Shi1,2, Tianqi Zhao1,2, Wendong Wang3, Fangli Peng1,2, Ting Wang1,2, Yong Jia1,2, Linxuan Zou1,4, Peng Wang1,2, Simengge Yang1, Yue Fan1, Junwei Zong5,6, Xueling Qu7,8, Shouyu Wang9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In hospitalized patients, drug side effects usually trigger intestinal mucositis (IM), which in turn damages intestinal absorption and reduces the efficacy of treatment. It has been discovered that natural polysaccharides can relieve IM. In this study, we extracted and purified homogenous polysaccharides of Wuguchong (HPW), a traditional Chinese medicine, and explored the protective effect of HPW on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced IM. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: 5-Fluorouracil; Drug side effects; Intestinal barrier; Intestinal mucositis; Polysaccharide; Wuguchong
Year: 2022 PMID: 35585561 PMCID: PMC9118848 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-022-00669-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.654
Fig. 1Purification and identification of HPW. A Elution curves of crude polysaccharides and the position of HPW. The abscissa is the number of elution tubes, and the ordinate is the absorbance value of the tracking sugar levels at 490 nm by the phenol–sulfuric acid method. B Ion chromatogram of the monosaccharide composition of HPW samples. The abscissa is the retention time (Time, min), and the ordinate is the response value of the ion detection (Response, nC). C Aggregated table of properties and monosaccharide composition of HPW
Fig. 2Effect of HPW on the physiological manifestations of mice. A Body weight change analysis. (Weight/initial weight) × 100%. B The diarrhoea scores of the mice. C Food intake of mice in each group. The data are presented as the means ± SEM and were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (n = 8). “*” represents the comparison with the model group (water + 5-FU), and “#” represents the comparison with the control group (water + saline). One tag means p < 0.05, two tokens represent p < 0.01, and three indicates p < 0.001
Fig. 3Microhistological examination of the small intestine. A HE staining of intestine tissues (scale bar = 100 μm). B Villus height. C Crypt depth. D The ratio of V/C. E PAS staining of goblet cells (scale bar = 50 μm). F Analysis of goblet cell counts. The data are presented as the means ± SEM and were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (n = 8). “*” represents the comparison with the model group (water + 5-FU), and “#” represents the comparison with the control group (water + saline). One tag means p < 0.05, two tokens represent p < 0.01, and three is p < 0.001
Fig. 4Effect of HPW on small intestinal barrier indices. A D-lactic acid (D-LA), B DAO and E total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) in serum. C SIgA in tissue homogenate. D Contrast diagram showing Occludin, Claudin-1, PCNA and GAPDH protein bands. F–H Analysis of their respective greyscale values. The data are presented as the means ± SEM and were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (n = 8). The “*” represents the comparison with the model group (water + 5-FU), and “#” represents the comparison with the control group (water + saline). One tag means p < 0.05, two tokens represent p < 0.01, and three are p < 0.001
Fig. 5Effect of HPW on the inflammatory pathway and inflammatory factors. Greyscale value analysis of A COX-2, B NF-κB and D TNF-α. C Contrast diagram showing these three molecules and GAPDH protein bands. Analysis of E IL-1β, F IL-10 in tissue homogenate. The data are presented as the means ± SEM and were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (n = 8). “*” represents the comparison with the model group (water + 5-FU), and “#” represents the comparison with the control group (water + saline). One tag means p < 0.05, two tokens represent p < 0.01, and three are p < 0.001
Fig. 6Effect of HPW on SCFAs. Analysis of A total SCFAs, B acetic acid, C propionic acid, and D butyric acid. The data are presented as the means ± SEM and were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (n = 8). “*” represents the comparison with the model group (water + 5-FU), and “#” represents the comparison with the control group (water + saline). One tag means p < 0.05, two tokens represent p < 0.01, and three are p < 0.001