Literature DB >> 35585251

A novel use of cone beam CT: flexion and extension weight-bearing imaging to assess spinal stability.

Naomi Winn1, Simranjeet Kaur2, Victor Cassar-Pullicino2, Matthew Ockendon2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess spinal stability in different physiological positions whilst weight-bearing.
METHODS: A cone beam CT scanner (CBCT) was used to identify any abnormal motion in the spine in different physiological positions whilst weight-bearing. The lumbar spine was assessed in 6 different patients with a comfortable neutral standing position and standing flexion and extension images in selected patients. Seated, weight-bearing flexion and extension images of the cervical spine were obtained in a further patient. Clinical indications included stability assessment post-trauma, post-surgical fusion and back pain. The projection images were reconstructed using bone and soft tissue algorithms to give isotropic CT images which could be viewed as per conventional multi-detector CT images. The flexion and extension CBCT data were fused to give a representation of any spinal movement between the extremes of motion.
RESULTS: The flexion and extension weight-bearing images gave anatomical detail of the spine. Detail of the surgical constructs was possible. Dynamic structural information about spinal alignment, facet joints, exit foramina and paraspinal musculature was possible. The effective dose from the neutral position was equal to that of supine, multi-detector CT.
CONCLUSION: CBCT can be used to image the lumbar and cervical spine in physiological weight-bearing positions and at different extremes of spinal motion. This novel application of an existing technology can be used to aid surgical decision making to assess spinal stability and to investigate occult back and leg pain. Its use should be limited to specific clinical indications, given the relatively high radiation dose.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone beam CT; Flexion and extension imaging; Spinal stability

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35585251     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07233-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  15 in total

1.  Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic-kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results.

Authors:  J Randy Jinkins; Jay S Dworkin; Raymond V Damadian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Upright cone CT of the hindfoot: comparison of the non-weight-bearing with the upright weight-bearing position.

Authors:  Anna Hirschmann; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Georg Klammer; Norman Espinosa; Florian M Buck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  The EOS™ imaging system and its uses in daily orthopaedic practice.

Authors:  Tamás Illés; Szabolcs Somoskeöy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  3D imaging for hindfoot alignment assessment: a comparative study between non-weight-bearing MRI and weight-bearing CT.

Authors:  Anil Haldar; Alessio Bernasconi; Syed Ehtesham Junaid; Kar Ho Brian Lee; Matthew Welck; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Weight-bearing MRI of the Lumbar Spine: Spinal Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Bjarke Brandt Hansen; Cecilie Lerche Nordberg; Philip Hansen; Henning Bliddal; James F Griffith; Gilles Fournier; Ingrid Thorseth; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Mikael Boesen
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Weight-bearing Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Ryan Ka Lok Lee; James F Griffith
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Weight-bearing MRI of the Lumbar Spine: Technical Aspects.

Authors:  Cecilie Lerche Nordberg; Bjarke Brandt Hansen; Janus Damm Nybing; Philip Hansen; Henning Bliddal; James F Griffith; Gilles Fournier; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Mikael Boesen
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Ultra-low-dose CT versus radiographs for minor spine and pelvis trauma: a Bayesian analysis of accuracy.

Authors:  Aymeric Hamard; Joel Greffier; Sophie Bastide; Ahmed Larbi; Takieddine Addala; Alexandre Sadate; Jean-Paul Beregi; Julien Frandon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Lumbar spine visualisation based on kinematic analysis from videofluoroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Y Zheng; M S Nixon; R Allen
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  In vivo 3D tomography of the lumbar spine using a twin robotic X-ray system: quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the lumbar neural foramina in supine and upright position.

Authors:  Anna L Falkowski; Balazs K Kovacs; Robyn M Benz; Patrick Tobler; Stephan Schön; Bram Stieltjes; Anna Hirschmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.