Literature DB >> 35583349

Complete Genome Sequence of Tea Plant Necrotic Ring Blotch Virus Detected from a Tea Plant in Japan.

Noriko Maruyama1, Nozomu Iwabuchi1, Masanobu Nishikawa1, Takamichi Nijo1, Tetsuya Yoshida1, Yugo Kitazawa1, Kensaku Maejima1, Shigetou Namba1, Yasuyuki Yamaji1.   

Abstract

We report the complete genome sequence of a Japanese isolate of Tea plant necrotic ring blotch virus (TPNRBV-J). The predicted TPNRBV-J genes have the same organization as those of a Chinese isolate, and the 5' termini of the segments have conserved nucleotide sequences.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35583349      PMCID: PMC9202382          DOI: 10.1128/mra.00323-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Tea plant necrotic ring blotch virus (TPNRBV) is a member of the genus Blunervirus, in the family Kitaviridae (1, 2). TPNRBV has four positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome segments, designated RNA1 to -4 (1). TPNRBV was identified in China and Iran from tea plants (Camellia sinensis [L.] O. Kuntze) with discoloration and necrotic ring blotches on the leaves (1, 3). To date, the complete nucleotide sequence has been determined for only one TPNRBV isolate from China (1). In Japan, while several diseases with virus-like symptoms have been recorded in tea plants (4–6), there have been no reports on the detection of TPNRBV or its sequences. In 2018, leaves of a tea plant showing necrotic ring blotches were collected in the Kanto region of Japan. Total RNA was extracted from leaves using the ISOSPIN plant RNA kit (Nippon Gene, Japan). A partial fragment each from TPNRBV RNA1 to -4 was amplified by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using TPNRBV-specific primer pairs (1), cloned into pCR Blunt II-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, USA), and sequenced using Sanger sequencing. A BLASTn search (7) showed that each fragment had the highest nucleotide sequence identities (90 to 97%) with the Chinese TPNRBV isolate (1). To determine the complete genome sequence of the Japanese isolate (TPNRBV-J), nine overlapping fragments excluding the 5′ and 3′ ends were amplified by RT-PCR using primers designed from the Chinese isolate (Table 1). The 5′ and 3′ terminal regions of each genome segment were amplified using a GeneRacer kit (Invitrogen) with TPNRBV-specific or oligodeoxythymidylic acid [oligo(dT)] primers (Table 1). Each fragment was cloned and sequenced as described above. The complete genome sequence of each segment was constructed by assembling all overlapping fragments using ATGC v. 4.3.5 (Genetyx, Japan) with default settings, which showed 100% identity in the overlapping regions.
TABLE 1

List of primers used in this study

PrimerSequence (5′ to 3′)PositionaPurposec
GeneRacer oligo(dT) primer GCTGTCAACGATACGCTACGTAACGGCATGACAGTGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT poly (A)Reverse transcription
TPNRBV1-Fb GCCCTGACAACGCAAAAGAACTGATG 296–321Detection of RNA1
TPNRBV1-Rb GTGACGGGATATTTTTGGACGACTGT  830–805Detection of RNA1
TPNRBV2-Fb GGGCCGGGGTGTGGAAAAACTT 1022–1043Detection of RNA2
TPNRBV2-Rb TTCTTATCATCCCGGCAAAACACA  1572–1549Detection and PCR for RNA2 (nt 37–1572)
TPNRBV3-Fb TTCGCCACTCACAAAGACAACAAACT 1542–1567Detection of RNA3
TPNRBV3-Rb GTAGCGGAGCGGAAAGAAAAGACT 2000–1977Detection of RNA3
TPNRBV4-Fb TCAGTGGCGCGATTATCAGAAGGTA 1709–1733Detection of RNA4
TPNRBV4-Rb CGCGCAAGAAGTCGGTCAAAAC 1955–1933Detection of RNA4
TPNRBV1-35F GCACAGAATACCATATTTTAAAC 35–57PCR for RNA1 (nt 35–1664)
TPNRBV1-1664R GAATTTATCCGCCTCACTTTA 1664–1644PCR for RNA1 (nt 35–1664)
TPNRBV1-1560F GCTGGTTGTCGCGATCTATA 1560–1579PCR for RNA1 (nt 1560–3285)
TPNRBV1-3285R AGACCCAACATACTGATCGAT 3285–3265PCR for RNA1 (nt 1560–3285)
TPNRBV1-3181F CATTTTGATCATTTGAAAAGGA 3181–3202PCR for RNA1 (nt 3181–4872)
TPNRBV1-4872R AACAACATCTATAGAAGATATCC 4872–4850PCR for RNA1 (nt 3181–4872)
TPNRBV1-4767F TGTCGAATCAGCGAAATCTA 4767–4786PCR for RNA1 (nt 4767–5889)
TPNRBV1-5889R ATAACGACGACGAAATAACTG 5889–5869PCR for RNA1 (nt 4767–5889)
TPNRBV2-37F CTGAAATCACCATATTTTAAACC 37–59PCR for RNA2 (nt 37–1572)
TPNRBV2-1498F GTCGTCGTATCCTTTGTCTAAG 1498–1519PCR for RNA2 (nt 1498–3101)
TPNRBV2-3101R CAAGTAACATGCATTCGATTAAC 3101–3079PCR for RNA2 (nt 1498–3101)
TPNRBV2-3008F GAAGCCGAGAACTATAACTGTG 3008–3029PCR for RNA2 (nt 3008–4023)
TPNRBV2-4023R CAATATAATGACAGTATCGTCG 4023–4002PCR for RNA2 (nt 3008–4023)
TPNRBV3-68F GTCGTTCTCTGGTCTAATAC 68–87PCR for RNA3 (nt 68–2664)
TPNRBV3-1384R ACAGGGTTGTTCTTTGCATAC 1384–1364Sequencing for RNA3
TPNRBV3-1259F TATGATGGTTTTACCATTCTGAC 1259–1281Sequencing for RNA3
TPNRBV3-2664R ACATACCACATGAAATGATTTG 2664–2643PCR for RNA3 (nt 68–2664)
TPNRBV4-34F GGTTGTTAATCACACCATATC 34–54PCR for RNA4 (nt 34–2212)
TPNRBV4-830F CCATCACACTCTATACCTAATATG 830–853Sequencing for RNA4
TPNRBV4-2212R ACATACCAATTGAGAAAATTTG 2212–2191PCR for RNA4 (nt 34–2212)
TPNRBV1-204R CGGAGGACTAAAACCGAGATTAT 204–1825′ RACE for RNA1
TPNRBV1-5569F AATGACATAAACCTTAACTACCC 5569–55913′ RACE for RNA1
TPNRBV2-221R CGAGTTCCACTAACGATTTAGGTG 221–1985′ RACE for RNA2
TPNRBV2-3848F ACCGAGTTATGGTATATAAACC 3848–38693′ RACE for RNA2
TPNRBV3-113R CATGTCAGATTGTTAGGTGGTAGCG 113–895′ RACE for RNA3
TPNRBV3-2555F CTGAATAATAATATCGTTCGTAA 2555–25773′ RACE for RNA3
TPNRBV4-158R GCCACGATAGCCAACTCAAGTGT 158–1365′ RACE for RNA4
TPNRBV4-1929F AAAAGTTTTGACCGACTTCTT 1929–19493′ RACE for RNA4
T7F TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG pCR-Blunt II-TOPO vectorSequencing for TOPO vector
SP6 CATACGATTTAGGTGACACTATAG pCR-Blunt II-TOPO vectorSequencing for TOPO vector
M13F GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT pCR-Blunt II-TOPO vectorSequencing for TOPO vector
M13R CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC pCR-Blunt II-TOPO vectorSequencing for TOPO vector

Numbers are based on TPNRBV-J (GenBank accession numbers LC566237 to LC566240).

Hao et al. (1).

RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends.

List of primers used in this study Numbers are based on TPNRBV-J (GenBank accession numbers LC566237 to LC566240). Hao et al. (1). RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends. The complete RNA1 to -4 sequences excluding poly(A) tails at the 3′ ends were 5,912 (42.2% GC content), 4,118 (41.4% GC content), 2,684 (42.0% GC content), and 2,232 (44.7% GC content) nucleotides (nt) long, respectively. The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) open reading frame (ORF) finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/) was used to predict each ORF using default parameters. Putative protein functions were manually annotated using the NCBI conserved domain database (v. 3.19) using default parameters (8). RNA1 possessed a single ORF (nt 130 to 5715), which contained conserved methyltransferase, cysteine-protease, and helicase (HEL) domains. RNA2 possessed a single ORF (nt 134 to 3766), which contained conserved HEL domains and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. RNA3 possessed four ORFs encoding 14-kDa (nt 111 to 482), 29-kDa (nt 528 to 1280), 21-kDa (nt 1328 to 1876), and 22-kDa (nt 1929 to 2561) proteins with unknown functions. RNA4 possessed a single ORF (nt 398 to 1345), which contained a putative movement protein. A conserved nucleotide motif (5′-AATTACGA-3′) was found at the 5′ termini of RNA1 to -3, while RNA4 had a slightly different one (5′-A-3′). The sequence identity with the reported isolate was calculated using the MUSCLE algorithm (9) in the program SDT v. 1.2 (10). The amino acid sequence identities of each ORF compared to the Chinese isolate were 95.2 to 99.5%. Based on the proposed species demarcation criterion in the genus Blunervirus, which has less than 75% amino acid sequence identity for the single protein encoded by the RNA1 (11), TPNRBV-J was found to belong to the same species as the Chinese TPNRBV isolate.

Data availability.

The genome sequence of TPNRBV-J has been deposited in the DDBJ under accession numbers LC566237 (RNA1), LC566238 (RNA2), LC566239 (RNA3), and LC566240 (RNA4).
  6 in total

1.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Basic local alignment search tool.

Authors:  S F Altschul; W Gish; W Miller; E W Myers; D J Lipman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020.

Authors:  Shennan Lu; Jiyao Wang; Farideh Chitsaz; Myra K Derbyshire; Renata C Geer; Noreen R Gonzales; Marc Gwadz; David I Hurwitz; Gabriele H Marchler; James S Song; Narmada Thanki; Roxanne A Yamashita; Mingzhang Yang; Dachuan Zhang; Chanjuan Zheng; Christopher J Lanczycki; Aron Marchler-Bauer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Changes to virus taxonomy and to the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2021).

Authors:  Peter J Walker; Stuart G Siddell; Elliot J Lefkowitz; Arcady R Mushegian; Evelien M Adriaenssens; Poliane Alfenas-Zerbini; Andrew J Davison; Donald M Dempsey; Bas E Dutilh; María Laura García; Balázs Harrach; Robert L Harrison; R Curtis Hendrickson; Sandra Junglen; Nick J Knowles; Mart Krupovic; Jens H Kuhn; Amy J Lambert; Małgorzata Łobocka; Max L Nibert; Hanna M Oksanen; Richard J Orton; David L Robertson; Luisa Rubino; Sead Sabanadzovic; Peter Simmonds; Donald B Smith; Nobuhiro Suzuki; Koenraad Van Dooerslaer; Anne-Mieke Vandamme; Arvind Varsani; Francisco Murilo Zerbini
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.574

5.  SDT: a virus classification tool based on pairwise sequence alignment and identity calculation.

Authors:  Brejnev Muhizi Muhire; Arvind Varsani; Darren Patrick Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Discovery of Plant Viruses From Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) by Metagenomic Sequencing.

Authors:  Xinyuan Hao; Weifu Zhang; Fumei Zhao; Ying Liu; Wenjun Qian; Yuchun Wang; Lu Wang; Jianming Zeng; Yajun Yang; Xinchao Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.