Literature DB >> 35582245

Transitioning from heparin to saline locks for central venous access devices in oncology: An evidence-based practice approach.

Terri Jabaley1, Niya Xiong2, Susanne Conley3, Teresa Mazeika4, Danielle Johnson4, Brenda A Biggins5, Nancy Hilton6, Fangxin Hong7.   

Abstract

Central vascular access devices (CVADs) are often essential to the care of patients undergoing long-term cancer treatment. CVAD maintenance is an essential oncology nurse competency. Evidence-based practice (EBP) in flushing and locking help to prevent intraluminal occlusion, a common complication. Heparinized saline (HS) has been the standard locking solution for CVADs. However, research indicates no superiority of HS over normal saline (NS). The objectives of this EBP project were 1) to evaluate whether a significant difference in intraluminal occlusion was associated with the change from HS to NS use for locking CVADs in ambulatory oncology care, and 2) to evaluate the effects of peer nurse mentoring on nurses' and patients' perspectives about the practice change. Analysis of data revealed decreases in alteplase usage after transitioning to NS locking. Patient and nurse surveys indicated that peer nurse mentoring increased nurse and patient confidence and competence in making the practice transition.
© 2022 Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology (CANO).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35582245      PMCID: PMC9040787          DOI: 10.5737/23688076322286293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Oncol Nurs J        ISSN: 1181-912X


  35 in total

1.  Normal saline versus heparin solution to lock totally implanted venous access devices: Results from a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Alberto Dal Molin; Mario Clerico; Michela Baccini; Linda Guerretta; Barbara Sartorello; Laura Rasero
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.398

2.  Evidence-Based Practice in Oncology Nursing: Oncology Nursing Society Survey Results.

Authors:  Pamela K Ginex; Erin Dickman; Bindu Thomas; Sharon Tucker; Jinhong Guo; Lynn Gallagher-Ford
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.027

3.  Innovations that INSPIRE.

Authors:  Gwenyth R Wallen
Journal:  Nurs Manage       Date:  2014-09

Review 4.  Effect of Evidence-Based Practice Programs on Individual Barriers of Workforce Nurses: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Reginald Middlebrooks; Heather Carter-Templeton; Angela R Mund
Journal:  J Contin Educ Nurs       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 1.224

5.  Comparison between Saline Solution Containing Heparin versus Saline Solution in the Lock of Totally Implantable Catheters.

Authors:  Antonio Rafael de Oliveira Brito; Kenji Nishinari; Paulo Fernandes Saad; Karen Ruggeri Saad; Monica Aparecida Tomé Pereira; Suellen Cristina Dias Emídio; Guilherme Yazbek; Guilherme Andre Zottele Bomfim; Rafael Noronha Cavalcante; Mariana Krutman; Marcelo Passos Teivelis; Bruno Soriano Pignataro; Igor Yoshio Imagawa Fonseca; Guilherme Centofanti; Bruno Leonardo Freitas Soares
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 6.  Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.

Authors:  L Aubree Shay; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Comparing normal saline versus diluted heparin to lock non-valved totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients: a randomised, non-inferiority, open trial.

Authors:  G A Goossens; M Jérôme; C Janssens; W E Peetermans; S Fieuws; P Moons; J Verschakelen; K Peerlinck; M Jacquemin; M Stas
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Self-Efficacy: Changing the Tide of Evidence-Based Practice.

Authors:  Carol Boswell; Alyce Ashcraft; JoAnn Long; Sharon Cannon; Pam DiVito-Thomas; Terry Delaney
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Hospital-based interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and facilitators to implementation processes.

Authors:  Liesbeth Geerligs; Nicole M Rankin; Heather L Shepherd; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Drugs and Devices: Comparison of European and U.S. Approval Processes.

Authors:  Gail A Van Norman
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2016-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.