PURPOSE: Patients' concerns regarding clinical trial (CT) participation include apprehension about side effects, quality of life (QoL), financial burden, and quality of care. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the experience of patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma who were treated on CTs (CT group, n = 35) versus patients treated with standard approaches (non-CT group, n = 88) focusing on QoL, financial burden of care, and patients' perception of quality of care over a 1-year period. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in any of the patient-reported outcomes in CT versus non-CT groups. We observed an initial decline in overall QoL in the first 3 months across both groups, driven primarily by physical and functional well-being. QoL gradually improved and was above baseline by month 12. Patients reported highest improvement in the functional well-being subdomain. Patients in both groups reported high satisfaction with the quality of care received, and there were no differences in overall satisfaction, communication with team, or access to care. At baseline, 16%-19% of patients reported financial burden, which increased to a peak of 33% in the CT group and to 49% in the non-CT group over the course of 1 year. There was no significant difference in financial burden in the two groups overall. Most of the patients reported getting all the care that was deemed medically necessary in both groups. However, a significant proportion of patients reported having to make other kinds of financial sacrifices because of their cancer (CT group: 33% of patients at baseline and 21%-40% over 1 year; non-CT group: 19% at baseline and 25%-36% over 1 year). CONCLUSION: Patients treated on CTs reported comparable QoL and quality of care with the non-CT group. A high proportion of patients reported financial burden over time in both groups. Our findings can serve as a guide to educate patients regarding CT participation and highlight the need to address the significant financial burden experienced by patients with cancer.
PURPOSE: Patients' concerns regarding clinical trial (CT) participation include apprehension about side effects, quality of life (QoL), financial burden, and quality of care. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the experience of patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma who were treated on CTs (CT group, n = 35) versus patients treated with standard approaches (non-CT group, n = 88) focusing on QoL, financial burden of care, and patients' perception of quality of care over a 1-year period. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in any of the patient-reported outcomes in CT versus non-CT groups. We observed an initial decline in overall QoL in the first 3 months across both groups, driven primarily by physical and functional well-being. QoL gradually improved and was above baseline by month 12. Patients reported highest improvement in the functional well-being subdomain. Patients in both groups reported high satisfaction with the quality of care received, and there were no differences in overall satisfaction, communication with team, or access to care. At baseline, 16%-19% of patients reported financial burden, which increased to a peak of 33% in the CT group and to 49% in the non-CT group over the course of 1 year. There was no significant difference in financial burden in the two groups overall. Most of the patients reported getting all the care that was deemed medically necessary in both groups. However, a significant proportion of patients reported having to make other kinds of financial sacrifices because of their cancer (CT group: 33% of patients at baseline and 21%-40% over 1 year; non-CT group: 19% at baseline and 25%-36% over 1 year). CONCLUSION: Patients treated on CTs reported comparable QoL and quality of care with the non-CT group. A high proportion of patients reported financial burden over time in both groups. Our findings can serve as a guide to educate patients regarding CT participation and highlight the need to address the significant financial burden experienced by patients with cancer.
Authors: Gwendolyn P Quinn; Alexis Koskan; Kristen J Wells; Luis E Gonzalez; Cathy D Meade; Christie L Pratt Pozo; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Douglas J Weckstein; Christian A Thomas; Ivette F Emery; Barbara F Shea; Alison Fleury; Margaret E White; Elizabeth Chase; Cindy Robinson; Stacey Frazier; Christine Pilar Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Joseph M Unger; Dawn L Hershman; Kathy S Albain; Carol M Moinpour; Judith A Petersen; Kenda Burg; John J Crowley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S Yousuf Zafar; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Deborah Schrag; Donald H Taylor; Amy M Goetzinger; Xiaoyin Zhong; Amy P Abernethy Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-02-26
Authors: Yu-Ning Wong; Mark D Schluchter; Terrance L Albrecht; Al Bowen Benson; Joanne Buzaglo; Michael Collins; Anne Lederman Flamm; Linda Fleisher; Michael Katz; Tyler G Kinzy; Tasnuva M Liu; Sharon Manne; Seunghee Margevicius; Dawn M Miller; Suzanne M Miller; David Poole; Stephanie Raivitch; Nancy Roach; Eric Ross; Neal J Meropol Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ryan D Nipp; Hang Lee; Emily Gorton; Morgan Lichtenstein; Salome Kuchukhidze; Elyse Park; Bruce A Chabner; Beverly Moy Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-04-15
Authors: Andrew Davies; Peter Trask; Judit Demeter; Axel Florschütz; Mathias Hänel; Tomohiro Kinoshita; Ruth Pettengell; Hang Quach; Stephen Robinson; Shalal Sadullah; Juan-Manuel Sancho; Miklos Udvardy; Mathias Witzens-Harig; Andrea Knapp; Wenxin Liu Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: Stefan Knop; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Kenshi Suzuki; Andrzej Jakubowiak; Chantal Doyen; Paulo Lucio; Zsolt Nagy; Ganna Usenko; Ludek Pour; Mark Cook; Sebastian Grosicki; Andre Crepaldi; Anna Marina Liberati; Philip Campbell; Tatiana Shelekhova; Sung-Soo Yoon; Genadi Losava; Tomoaki Fujisaki; Mamta Garg; Jianping Wang; Susan Wroblewski; Anupa Kudva; Katharine S Gries; John Fastenau; Jesus San-Miguel; Michele Cavo Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 4.430