| Literature DB >> 35577954 |
Bin Li1, Wen Zhang1,2, Chuang Guo1, Hao Xu1,2, Longfei Li3, Minghao Fang3, Yinlei Hu4, Xinye Zhang3, Xinfeng Yao1, Meifang Tang1, Ke Liu1, Xuetong Zhao5, Jun Lin1,2, Linzhao Cheng3, Falai Chen4, Tian Xue3, Kun Qu6,7,8.
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics approaches have substantially advanced our capacity to detect the spatial distribution of RNA transcripts in tissues, yet it remains challenging to characterize whole-transcriptome-level data for single cells in space. Addressing this need, researchers have developed integration methods to combine spatial transcriptomic data with single-cell RNA-seq data to predict the spatial distribution of undetected transcripts and/or perform cell type deconvolution of spots in histological sections. However, to date, no independent studies have comparatively analyzed these integration methods to benchmark their performance. Here we present benchmarking of 16 integration methods using 45 paired datasets (comprising both spatial transcriptomics and scRNA-seq data) and 32 simulated datasets. We found that Tangram, gimVI, and SpaGE outperformed other integration methods for predicting the spatial distribution of RNA transcripts, whereas Cell2location, SpatialDWLS, and RCTD are the top-performing methods for the cell type deconvolution of spots. We provide a benchmark pipeline to help researchers select optimal integration methods to process their datasets.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35577954 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01480-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Methods ISSN: 1548-7091 Impact factor: 28.547