Literature DB >> 35576957

Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab versus placebo plus atezolizumab as a first-line treatment for PD-L1-selected non-small-cell lung cancer (CITYSCAPE): primary and follow-up analyses of a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study.

Byoung Chul Cho1, Delvys Rodriguez Abreu2, Maen Hussein3, Manuel Cobo4, Anjan J Patel5, Nevena Secen6, Ki Hyeong Lee7, Bartomeu Massuti8, Sandrine Hiret9, James Chih Hsin Yang10, Fabrice Barlesi11, Dae Ho Lee12, Luis Paz Ares13, Robert W Hsieh14, Namrata S Patil14, Patrick Twomey14, Xiaoying Yang14, Raymond Meng14, Melissa L Johnson15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Targeted inhibition of the PD-L1-PD-1 pathway might be further amplified through combination of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors with novel anti-TIGIT inhibitory immune checkpoint agents, such as tiragolumab. In the CITYSCAPE trial, we aimed to assess the preliminary efficacy and safety of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) therapy as first-line treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: CITYSCAPE is a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with chemotherapy-naive, PD-L1-positive (defined as a tumour proportion score of ≥1% by 22C3 immunohistochemistry pharmDx assay; Dako, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) recurrent or metastatic NSCLC with measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and no EGFR or ALK alterations were enrolled from 41 clinics in Europe, Asia, and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via an interactive voice or web-based response system, to receive tiragolumab (600 mg) plus atezolizumab (1200 mg) or placebo plus atezolizumab intravenously once every 3 weeks. Investigators and patients were masked to treatment assignment. The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate and progression-free survival as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population, analysed after approximately 80 progression-free survival events had been observed in the primary population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03563716, and is ongoing.
FINDINGS: Patients were enrolled between Aug 10, 2018, and March 20, 2019. At data cutoff for the primary analysis (June 30, 2019), 135 of 275 patients assessed for eligibility were randomly assigned to receive tiragolumab plus atezolizumab (67 [50%]) or placebo plus atezolizumab (68 [50%]). In this primary analysis, after a median follow-up of 5·9 months (4·6-7·6, in the intention-to-treat population, 21 patients (31·3% [95% CI 19·5-43·2]) in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab group versus 11 patients (16·2% [6·7-25·7]) in the placebo plus atezolizumab group had an objective response (p=0·031). Median progression-free survival was 5·4 months (95% CI 4·2-not estimable) in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab group versus 3·6 months (2·7-4·4) in the placebo plus atezolizumab group (stratified hazard ratio 0·57 [95% CI 0·37-0·90], p=0·015). 14 (21%) patients receiving tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and 12 (18%) patients receiving placebo plus atezolizumab had serious treatment-related adverse events. The most frequently reported grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse event was lipase increase (in six [9%] patients in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab group vs two [3%] in the placebo plus atezolizumab group). Two treatment-related deaths (of pyrexia and infection) occurred in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab group.
INTERPRETATION: Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab showed a clinically meaningful improvement in objective response rate and progression-free survival compared with placebo plus atezolizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naive, PD-L1-positive, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC. Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab was well tolerated, with a safety profile generally similar to that of atezolizumab alone. These findings demonstrate that tiragolumab plus atezolizumab is a promising immunotherapy combination for the treatment of previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic NSCLC. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35576957     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00226-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   54.433


  12 in total

Review 1.  Immune checkpoint modulators in cancer immunotherapy: recent advances and emerging concepts.

Authors:  Yuchen Wang; Hao Zhang; Chao Liu; Zeyu Wang; Wantao Wu; Nan Zhang; Longbo Zhang; Jason Hu; Peng Luo; Jian Zhang; Zaoqu Liu; Yun Peng; Zhixiong Liu; Lanhua Tang; Quan Cheng
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 23.168

Review 2.  Signaling pathways and therapeutic interventions in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zi-Ning Lei; Qiu-Xu Teng; Qin Tian; Wei Chen; Yuhao Xie; Kaiming Wu; Qianlin Zeng; Leli Zeng; Yihang Pan; Zhe-Sheng Chen; Yulong He
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-10-08

Review 3.  Cutting-Edge: Preclinical and Clinical Development of the First Approved Lag-3 Inhibitor.

Authors:  Luisa Chocarro; Ana Bocanegra; Ester Blanco; Leticia Fernández-Rubio; Hugo Arasanz; Miriam Echaide; Maider Garnica; Pablo Ramos; Sergio Piñeiro-Hermida; Ruth Vera; David Escors; Grazyna Kochan
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 7.666

4.  Defining the Immune Checkpoint Landscape in Human Colorectal Cancer Highlights the Relevance of the TIGIT/CD155 Axis for Optimizing Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Kathleen Ducoin; Linda Bilonda-Mutala; Cécile Deleine; Romain Oger; Emilie Duchalais; Nicolas Jouand; Céline Bossard; Anne Jarry; Nadine Gervois-Segain
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  Recent Advances and Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Chelsea Peterson; Nathan Denlinger; Yiping Yang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Coexpression of lymphocyte-activation gene 3 and programmed death ligand-1 in tumor infiltrating immune cells predicts worse outcome in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chan Ho Lee; Soo Jin Jung; Won Ik Seo; Jae Il Chung; Dae Sim Lee; Dae Hoon Jeong; Youkyoung Jeon; Inhak Choi
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 7.  Combination of phototherapy with immune checkpoint blockade: Theory and practice in cancer.

Authors:  Yujie Zhao; Xu Liu; Xinyu Liu; Jing Yu; Xin Bai; Xi Wu; Xinyu Guo; Zhihui Liu; Xiaowei Liu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 8.786

8.  Liquid Biopsy and the Translational Bridge from the TIME to the Clinic.

Authors:  Paul Walker
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 9.  Signaling pathways and targeted therapies in lung squamous cell carcinoma: mechanisms and clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhenyi Niu; Runsen Jin; Yan Zhang; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-10-05

Review 10.  Emerging Targets in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Chen; Brian I Rini; Kathryn E Beckermann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 6.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.