Literature DB >> 35576348

Clinician Knowledge and Practices Related to a Patient History of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Nicole D Ford1, Cheryl L Robbins, Nina Nandi, Donald K Hayes, Fleetwood Loustalot, Elena Kuklina, Jean Y Ko.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinician screening practices for prior hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, knowledge of future risks associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, barriers and facilitators to referrals for cardiovascular disease risk evaluation in women with prior hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and variation by clinician- and practice-level characteristics.
METHODS: We used data from Fall DocStyles 2020, a cross-sectional, web-based panel survey of currently practicing U.S. clinicians. Of 2,231 primary care physicians, obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns), nurse practitioners, and physician assistants invited to participate, 67.3% (n=1,502) completed the survey. We calculated the prevalence of screening, knowledge of future risks, and barriers and facilitators to referrals, and assessed differences by clinician type using χ2 tests. We evaluated associations between clinician- and practice-level characteristics and not screening using a multivariable log-binomial model.
RESULTS: Overall, 73.6% of clinicians screened patients for a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; ob-gyns reported the highest rate of screening (94.8%). Overall, 24.8% of clinicians correctly identified all cardiovascular risks associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy listed in the survey. Lack of patient follow-through (51.5%) and patient refusal (33.6%) were the most frequently cited barriers to referral. More referral options (42.9%), patient education materials (36.2%), and professional guidelines (34.1%) were the most frequently cited resources needed to facilitate referrals. In the multivariable model, primary care physicians and nurse practitioners, as well as physician assistants, were more likely than ob-gyns to report not screening (adjusted prevalence ratio 5.54, 95% CI 3.24-9.50, and adjusted prevalence ratio 7.42, 95% CI 4.27-12.88, respectively). Clinicians seeing fewer than 80 patients per week (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.81, 95% CI 1.43-2.28) were more likely to not screen relative to those seeing 110 or more patients per week.
CONCLUSION: Three quarters of clinicians reported screening for a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; however, only one out of four clinicians correctly identified all of the cardiovascular risks associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy listed in the survey.
Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35576348      PMCID: PMC9141470          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.623


  26 in total

1.  Use of Internet panels to conduct surveys.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Honghu Liu; Arie Kapteyn
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  Risk of cardiovascular disease after pre-eclampsia and the effect of lifestyle interventions: a literature-based study.

Authors:  D Berks; M Hoedjes; H Raat; J J Duvekot; E A P Steegers; J D F Habbema
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 3.  Traveling towards disease: transportation barriers to health care access.

Authors:  Samina T Syed; Ben S Gerber; Lisa K Sharp
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-10

4.  Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Unique Opportunities for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Nisha I Parikh; Juan M Gonzalez; Cheryl A M Anderson; Suzanne E Judd; Kathryn M Rexrode; Mark A Hlatky; Erica P Gunderson; Jennifer J Stuart; Dhananjay Vaidya
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the american heart association.

Authors:  Lori Mosca; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Judy L Bezanson; Rowena J Dolor; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; L Kristin Newby; Ileana L Piña; Véronique L Roger; Leslee J Shaw; Dong Zhao; Theresa M Beckie; Cheryl Bushnell; Jeanine D'Armiento; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Jing Fang; Theodore G Ganiats; Antoinette S Gomes; Clarisa R Gracia; Constance K Haan; Elizabeth A Jackson; Debra R Judelson; Ellie Kelepouris; Carl J Lavie; Anne Moore; Nancy A Nussmeier; Elizabeth Ofili; Suzanne Oparil; Pamela Ouyang; Vivian W Pinn; Katherine Sherif; Sidney C Smith; George Sopko; Nisha Chandra-Strobos; Elaine M Urbina; Viola Vaccarino; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Do men and women respond differently to blood pressure-lowering treatment? Results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials.

Authors:  Fiona Turnbull; Mark Woodward; Bruce Neal; Federica Barzi; Toshiharu Ninomiya; John Chalmers; Vlado Perkovic; Nicole Li; S MacMahon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.897

8.  Using discounting biases, risk characteristics, and perceived control improves preventive programs.

Authors:  Monica Ortendahl
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2007-06

9.  Improving blood pressure screening and control at an academic health system.

Authors:  Ulfat Shaikh; Julie Petray; David H Wisner
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-03

Review 10.  Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Future Maternal Cardiovascular Risk.

Authors:  Wendy Ying; Janet M Catov; Pamela Ouyang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.