Literature DB >> 26170052

Use of Internet panels to conduct surveys.

Ron D Hays1, Honghu Liu, Arie Kapteyn.   

Abstract

The use of Internet panels to collect survey data is increasing because it is cost-effective, enables access to large and diverse samples quickly, takes less time than traditional methods to obtain data for analysis, and the standardization of the data collection process makes studies easy to replicate. A variety of probability-based panels have been created, including Telepanel/CentERpanel, Knowledge Networks (now GFK KnowledgePanel), the American Life Panel, the Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences panel, and the Understanding America Study panel. Despite the advantage of having a known denominator (sampling frame), the probability-based Internet panels often have low recruitment participation rates, and some have argued that there is little practical difference between opting out of a probability sample and opting into a nonprobability (convenience) Internet panel. This article provides an overview of both probability-based and convenience panels, discussing potential benefits and cautions for each method, and summarizing the approaches used to weight panel respondents in order to better represent the underlying population. Challenges of using Internet panel data are discussed, including false answers, careless responses, giving the same answer repeatedly, getting multiple surveys from the same respondent, and panelists being members of multiple panels. More is to be learned about Internet panels generally and about Web-based data collection, as well as how to evaluate data collected using mobile devices and social-media platforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26170052      PMCID: PMC4546874          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0617-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  8 in total

1.  Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies.

Authors:  Lynda F Voigt; Stephen M Schwartz; David R Doody; Spencer C Lee; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function.

Authors:  Richard C Gershon; Molly V Wagster; Hugh C Hendrie; Nathan A Fox; Karon F Cook; Cindy J Nowinski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel.

Authors:  Honghu Liu; David Cella; Richard Gershon; Jie Shen; Leo S Morales; William Riley; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study.

Authors:  Dennis G Fryback; Nancy Cross Dunham; Mari Palta; Janel Hanmer; Jennifer Buechner; Dasha Cherepanov; Shani A Herrington; Ron D Hays; Robert M Kaplan; Theodore G Ganiats; David Feeny; Paul Kind
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS(®)) Spanish-language physical functioning items.

Authors:  Sylvia H Paz; Karen L Spritzer; Leo S Morales; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Effects of mode and order of administration on generic health-related quality of life scores.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Seongeun Kim; Karen L Spritzer; Robert M Kaplan; Steve Tally; David Feeny; Honghu Liu; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Integrating a multimode design into a national random-digit-dialed telephone survey.

Authors:  Shaohua Sean Hu; Carol Pierannunzi; Lina Balluz
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Comparison of US panel vendors for online surveys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Ron D Hays; A Simon Pickard; David Cella; Dennis A Revicki; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total
  73 in total

1.  U.S. General Population Estimate for "Excellent" to "Poor" Self-Rated Health Item.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Karen L Spritzer; William W Thompson; David Cella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Assessing Children's Eudaimonic Well-Being: The PROMIS Pediatric Meaning and Purpose Item Banks.

Authors:  Christopher B Forrest; Katherine B Bevans; Ania Filus; Janine Devine; Brandon D Becker; Adam C Carle; Rachel E Teneralli; JeanHee Moon; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2019-10-01

3.  Development and validation of the Knowledge of Effective Parenting Test (KEPT) in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Oliver Lindhiem; Rachel A Vaughn-Coaxum; Janelle Higa; Jordan L Harris; David J Kolko; Paul A Pilkonis
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-02-11

4.  Survey mode effects and insurance coverage estimates in the redesigned Gallup well-being index.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sommers; Anna L Goldman; Dennis Lee; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The challenge of determining appropriate care in the era of patient-centered care and rising health care costs.

Authors:  Ian Coulter; Patricia Herman; Gery Ryan; Lara Hilton; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2018-12-24

6.  Cannabis use and driving under the influence: Behaviors and attitudes by state-level legal sale of recreational cannabis.

Authors:  Taylor Lensch; Kim Sloan; Julia Ausmus; Jennifer L Pearson; Kristen Clements-Nolle; Samantha Goodman; David Hammond
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS Pediatric Life Satisfaction item banks, child-report, and parent-proxy editions.

Authors:  Christopher B Forrest; Janine Devine; Katherine B Bevans; Brandon D Becker; Adam C Carle; Rachel E Teneralli; JeanHee Moon; Carole A Tucker; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  The CAN-DO-IT Model: a Process for Developing and Refining Online Recruitment in HIV/AIDS and Sexual Health Research.

Authors:  Kathryn Macapagal; Dennis H Li; Antonia Clifford; Krystal Madkins; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.071

9.  Prevention of alcohol use in older teens: A randomized trial of an online family prevention program.

Authors:  Hilary F Byrnes; Brenda A Miller; Joel W Grube; Beth Bourdeau; David B Buller; Meme Wang-Schweig; W Gill Woodall
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2019-01-14

10.  Linking Scores with Patient-Reported Health Outcome Instruments: A Validation Study and Comparison of Three Linking Methods.

Authors:  Benjamin D Schalet; Sangdon Lim; David Cella; Seung W Choi
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.