| Literature DB >> 35576192 |
Anum Khan1, Huma Ali1, Ubaid Ur Rehman1, Ali Osman Belduz2, Amna Bibi1, Mujib Abdulkadir Abdurahman3, Aamer Ali Shah1, Malik Badshah1, Fariha Hasan1, Ali Osman Kilic3, Asad Ullah4, Sarwat Jahan4, Muhammad Maqsood Ur Rehman1, Rashid Mansoor5, Samiullah Khan1.
Abstract
The increase in consumer demand for high-quality food products has led to growth in the use of new technologies and ingredients. Resistant starch (RS) is a recently recognised source of fibre and has received much attention for its potential health benefits and functional properties. However, knowledge about the fate of RS in modulating complex intestinal communities, the microbial members involved in its degradation, enhancement of microbial metabolites, and its functional role in body physiology is still limited. For this purpose, the current study was designed to ratify the physiological and functional health benefits of enzymatically prepared resistant starch (EM-RSIII) from maize flour. To approve the beneficial health effects as prebiotic, EM-RSIII was supplemented in rat diets. After 21 days of the experiment, EM-RSIII fed rats showed a significant reduction in body weight gain, fecal pH, glycemic response, serum lipid profile, insulin level and reshaping gut microbiota, and enhancing short-chain fatty acid compared to control. The count of butyrate-producing and starch utilizing bacteria, such as Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus genus in rat's gut, elevated after the consumption of medium and high doses of EM-RSIII, while the E. coli completely suppressed in high EM-RSIII fed rats. Short-chain fatty acids precisely increased in feces of EM-RSIII feed rats. Correlation analysis demonstrated that the effect of butyrate on functional and physiological alteration on the body had been investigated during the current study. Conclusively, the present study demonstrated the unprecedented effect of utilising EM-RSIII as a diet on body physiology and redesigning gut microorganisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35576192 PMCID: PMC9109903 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Average body weight gain of rats at the start and end of the experiment.
| Groups | Body weight(g) initial | Body weight(g) final |
|---|---|---|
|
| 170 ± 2 a | 250 ± 2 a |
|
| 170 ± 1 a | 243 ± 4 b |
|
| 170 ± 3 a | 230 ± 3 c |
|
| 170 ± 1 a | 208 ± 4 d |
Mean (n = 5) with the same letter in a column within same water regime are statistically similar at p< 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. Low RS = 2g/100g, Medium RS = 4g/100g, High RS = 8g/100g.
Average blood glucose level mg/dL of rats at different time intervals, i.e., fasting, 40 min, and 120 min at the start and end of the experiment.
| Time (min) | Groups | Initial blood glucose level mg/dL | Final blood glucose level mg/dL |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 113.8 ± 0.37 a | 116 ± 0.05 a |
|
| 123.6 ± 0.68 b | 113 ± 0.09 b | |
|
| 131.8 ± 0.37 c | 97 ± 0.019 c | |
|
| 113.4 ± 0.40 a | 91 ± 0.06 d | |
|
|
| 123.8 ± 0.58 b | 125 ± 0.13 a |
|
| 131.4 ± 0.24 c | 118 ± 0.69 b | |
|
| 113.6 ± 0.24 a | 110 ± 0.03 c | |
|
| 123.8 ± 0.37 b | 104 ± 0.11 d | |
|
|
| 131.2 ± 0.20 c | 134 ± 0.14 a |
|
| 113.6 ± 0.24 a | 123 ± 0.18 b | |
|
| 123.4 ± 0.24 b | 116 ± 0.05 c | |
|
| 131.4 ± 0.24 c | 108 ± 0.07 d |
Mean (n = 5) with the same letter in a column within same water regime are statistically similar at p< 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. Low RS = 2 g/100g, Medium RS = 4 g/100g, High RS = 8 g/100g.
Average fecal pH at start and end of the experiment.
| Groups | Fecal pH (initial) | Fecal pH (final) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 8 ± 0.1 a | 8.075 ± 0.015 a |
|
| 8 ± 0.2 a | 7.58 ± 0.015 b |
|
| 8 ± 0.3 a | 6.8 ± 0.1 c |
|
| 8 ± 0.4 a | 6.5 ± 0.15 d |
Mean (n = 5) with the same letter in a column within same water regime are statistically similar at p< 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. Low RS = 2g/100g, Medium RS = 4g/100g, High RS = 8g/100g.
Average cecum length and weight after dissecting the rats and average serum cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL, HDL, and insulin level from rats’ blood samples.
| Parameters studied | Control | Low RS | Medium RS | High RS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5.8 ± 0.1 b | 6 ± 0.1 b | 6.305 ± 0.005 a | 6.35 ± 0.15 a |
|
| 1.25 ± 0.05 c | 1.235 ± 0.005 d | 1.39 ± 0.01 b | 1.42 ± 0.01 a |
|
| 87 ± 1 a | 84 ± 1 b | 80 ± 1 c | 77 ± 1 d |
|
| 288 ± 2 a | 154 ± 2 b | 119 ± 1 c | 107 ± 1 d |
|
| 45 ± 1 a | 43 ± 2 a | 39 ± 1 c | 33 ± 1 d |
|
| 16 ± 2 b | 16.5 ± 0.5 b | 17 ± 1 b | 22 ± 2 a |
|
| 0.8 ± 0.1 a | 0.4 ± 0.1 b | 0.36 ± 0.14 b | 0.345 ± 0.145 b |
Mean (n = 5) with the same letter in a column within same water regime are statistically similar at p< 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. Low RS = 2 g/100 g, Medium RS = 4/100 g, High RS = 8 g/100 g.
Fig 1Colon histology of cecal rat’s samples.
A: Colon histology of control group, B: Colon histology of low EM-RSIII fed group, C: Colon histology of medium EM-RSIII group, D: Colon histology of high EM-RSIII group.
Fig 2CFU/mL counted on the probiotic media used.
(MRSA; De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar, RA; Rogosa agar, CA; modified Columbia agar and YCFA media used for the enumeration of probiotic bacteria.).
Different culture media used for quantitative isolation of microorganisms identified based on 16 sRNA.
| Culture media | Main organisms counted |
|---|---|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fig 3Correlation analyses between the fecal/serum butyrate levels and other biochemical indexes.
In the upper-right part of the matrix, the size and color of the circles demonstrate the level of the correlation index (red representing a negative correlation, and blue representing a positive correlation) and the corresponding numeric value of the correlation index can be found in the right side.