| Literature DB >> 35574574 |
Qi Zuo1, Jiaman Du2, Baofeng Di1, Junrong Zhou3, Lixia Zhang4, Hongxia Liu5, Xiaoyu Hou6.
Abstract
The COVID-19 epidemic poses a significant challenge to the operation of society and the resumption of work and production. How to quickly track the resident location and activity trajectory of the population, and identify the spread risk of the COVID-19 in geospatial space has important theoretical and practical significance for controlling the spread of the virus on a large scale. In this study, we take the geographical community as the research object, and use the mobile phone trajectory data to construct the spatiotemporal profile of the potential high-risk population. First, by using the spatiotemporal data collision method, identify, and recover the trajectories of the people who were in the same area with the confirmed patients during the same time. Then, based on the range of activities of both cohorts (the confirmed cases and the potentially infected groups), we analyze the risk level of the relevant places and evaluate the scale of potential spread. Finally, we calculate the probability of infection for different communities and construct the spatiotemporal profile for the transmission to help guide the distribution of preventive materials and human resources. The proposed method is verified using survey data of 10 confirmed cases and statistical data of 96 high-risk neighborhoods in Chengdu, China, between 15 January 2020 and 15 February 2020. The analysis finds that the method accurately simulates the spatiotemporal spread of the epidemic in Chengdu and measures the risk level in specific areas, which provides an objective basis for the government and relevant parties to plan and manage the prevention and control of the epidemic.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; community; mobile phone trajectory data; risk profiling; the spatiotemporal spread
Year: 2022 PMID: 35574574 PMCID: PMC9092495 DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2022.705698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Big Data ISSN: 2624-909X
Risk categories for a specific location.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Identified | P′> 0 | Steady | P | The location of the confirmed cases can be identified by the people who live or linger here |
| risk | Fluctuation | P′> 0, P | ||
| B Potential | P′= 0 | Steady | P″ > 0, P | People who have been at the same time and space with the confirmed case, live here |
| risk | Fluctuation | P′= 0, P″ > 0, P | People who have been at the same time and space with the confirmed case, do not live here | |
| C Normal | P′= 0, P″ = 0 | Susceptible area | The A,D,F index is high | People in these areas move to many places and in a large range |
| areas | Other areas | The A,D,F index is low | People in these areas move to fewer places and in a small range |
Spatial autocorrelation instruction.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| >1.96 | Positive spatial autocorrelation |
| [-1.96, 1.96] | Weak spatial correlation |
| < -1.96 | Negative spatial autocorrelation |
Figure 1Information entropy relationship.
The number of effective population resident places.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transient population (%) | 17.30 | 9.13 | 5.61 | 3.12 | 2.66 | 0.01 |
| Permanent population (%) | 7.69 | 21.33 | 19.22 | 9.29 | 4.64 | 0.00 |
| Total (%) | 55.45 | 37.24 | 7.31 | |||
Transient population refers to the non-permanent population that appears during the monitoring period (14 days) and has effectively resided at least one place in the city.
Classify the temporal and spatial activity of the population and the risk factor.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Low | 1 | Effective Resident Positions < =2 places | Low | Low |
| Medium | 5 | 3 places < Effective Resident Positions <5 places | Medium | Medium |
| High | 10 | Effective Resident Positions >5 places | High | High |
The degree of spatial transmission of people.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of position 1-2 (places) | 1 | 2 | Null |
| Number of position 3-5 (places) | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Number of position >5 (places) | 5 | 6 | 6 |
Figure 2Distribution of track resident point of people (A) population resident heat distribution map (B) population residential heat distribution map (C) distribution of population spatial activity (D) distribution of population spatial. The darker color presents more people in the location, and the lighter color presents fewer people stay in the location, and correspondingly the heat is lower.
Figure 3Distribution of residence and track resident point of confirmed patients (A) stationary place distribution (B) trajectory distribution.
Figure 4Distribution of track resident point.
Calculation methods for different risk categories.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A Identified risk | Red | Number of people * Space Activity Coefficient * Propagation Coefficient |
| B Potential risk | Yellow | Number of people * Space Activity Coefficient * Propagation Coefficient |
| C Normal region | Green | Number of people * Space Activity Coefficient * Propagation Coefficient*Mobility |
Figure 5Comprehensive location evaluation of the Chengdu University of Technology (A) The Chengdu University of Technology geographical distribution. Based on the spatial activity of the population to realize the time and space traceability and time and space tracking: Be able to trace and track the source of time and space for residents (including residence only, work only, job, and residence at the same address/same street/same district), visits (non-resident population in the district); It can analyze the overall situation in the administrative area, each street, and the specific community. (B) Analysis of diagnosed patients and intermediate communicators of the Chengdu University of Technology (C) Several elements of risk assessment: Risk category: There are 3 categories (A, B, B). Risk factor: It is mainly obtained based on the comprehensive analysis of population number and regional population density. The larger the value, the higher the risk; Resident population's out-of-home activity coefficient: A factor of the risk coefficient, which describes the outdoor activities of the permanent population in the location. The larger the number, the more active the residents in the location are out-going activities; Inbound visitor activity coefficient: a factor of the risk coefficient, indicating the liquidity of the location, the higher the coefficient, the stronger the liquidity.
Description of the spatial correlation distribution of different risk categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| A Identified risk | 1.12 | Positive spatial | Concentration |
| autocorrelation | |||
| B Potential risk | 1.28 | Negative spatial | Dispersion |
| autocorrelation | |||
| C Normal region | −1.2 | Weak spatial correlation | Random |
Figure 6The COVID-19 epidemic risk map of Chengdu.
Specific distribution characteristics of the affected communities.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A-B-C-A | Zhonghai No. 9 Residence, Jinxi Hotel, Zhonghai Chengnan No. 1 | 445; 941; 835 |
| A-B-C | Lloyds Garden-Chaoyang Langxiang Plaza-Tianxin Garden | 388; 921 |
| Hua Min Yiyuan-SiJi Kang Cheng Hotel-Shidai Haoting | 604; 850 | |
| Zhongliang Xiangyun-Wuhou Villa-Wuhou International Garden | 521; 769 | |
| A-B, segment type | Shuangnan Mansion-Shuangnan Garden Community | 368 |
| Bali Yangguang-Xiangmulin Garden | 468 | |
| Jia Zhao Ye Li Jing Mansion-Ruijing Lanting | 531 | |
| Shenxianshu Courtyard Phase 4-Vienna International Hotel | 536 | |
| Fengjing Yaju-Gaoyi Hotel | 596 | |
| Tianfu Changcheng Bainanjun-Shidai Jincheng Hotel | 849 | |
| The Holy Birch City-Guandu East Road Alley | 912 | |
| Tianfu Oucheng-Qingjiang Huatng | 922 | |
| Wanke Golden Area-Junfa Shidai Junyuan | 936 | |
| Linjiang Road, Yard 8-Roland Hotel | 974 | |
| Jinsha Guoji-Shiji Jinsha | 999 |
Figure 7The spatial distribution of epidemic communities.