| Literature DB >> 35574070 |
Keerthiraj Manjesh1, Aditi Kundu1, Anirban Dutta1, Supradip Saha1, Bhagyasree Sira Neelakanthaiah2.
Abstract
The present study aimed to develop nanoemulsions (NEs) of essential oil (EO) and lipid-soluble extract (HE) of Pogostemon cablin leaves using biosurfactant, saponin. Hydro-distilled EO and fat-soluble HE were analyzed using GC-MS, which revealed 38.7 ± 2.7% and 37.5 ± 2.1% patchoulol, respectively. EO and HE were formulated with saponin to prepare corresponding coarse emulsions (CEs); furthermore, high-speed homogenization for 2 min was followed by ultrasonication for 3 min with constant frequency of 50 kHz. of the CEs resulted in respective NEs. NEs were characterized for the physico-chemical properties such as emulsion intrinsic stability, particle size distribution, polydispersity index (PDI), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for morphology and accurate nanodroplet diameters. CEs and NEs were investigated for insecticidal efficacy against adults of Tetranychus urticae and larvae of Spodoptera litura. Stable NEs of EO and HE at 500 μg mL-1 concentration exhibited corresponding average particle size of 51.7 and 89.9 nm, while TEM image revealed spherical-shaped droplets with the average droplet diameters of 15.3 and 29.4 nm, respectively. NEs of EO and HE displayed highest efficacy in contact toxicity (LC50 43.2 and 58.4 μg mL-1) after 48 h and fumigant toxicity (LC50 9.3 and 13.6 μg mL-1) after 24 h against T. urticae. In addition, NEs of EO showed considerable antifeedant and feeding deterrent action (AI 99.21 ± 0.74 and FI 99.73 ± 1.24) against S. litura larvae.Entities:
Keywords: Tetranychus urticae; acaricidal; biopolymer; patchouli; ultrasonication; volatile oil
Year: 2022 PMID: 35574070 PMCID: PMC9101049 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.874221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Chemical composition of volatile organic components of EO and HE of P. cablin leaves.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| 928 | 932 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | – | RI, MS | |
| β-Pinene | 969 | 974 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | – | RI, MS |
| 1,018 | 1,024 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | – | RI, MS | |
| Nonanal | 1,103 | 1,105 | – | 3.0 ± 0.4 | RI, MS |
| Tridecane | 1,302 | 1,308 | – | 0.6 ± 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 1,409 | 1,412 | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | RI, MS | |
| γ-Elemene | 1,430 | 1,436 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | RI, MS |
| 1,436 | 1,440 | 17.7 ± 1.2 | 12.4 ± 0.9 | RI, MS | |
| Aromadendrene | 1,438 | 1,439 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | - | RI, MS |
| 1,441 | 1,443 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | RI, MS | |
| 1,452 | 1,457 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | RI, MS | |
| Seychellene | 1,458 | 1,460 | - | 2.7 ± 0.3 | RI, MS |
| α-Selinene | 1,474 | 1,475 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | RI, MS |
| γ-Gurjunene | 1,478 | 1,479 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | - | RI, MS |
| β-Selinene | 1,481 | 1,487 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | - | RI, MS |
| β-Guaiene | 1,482 | 1,490 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | RI, MS |
| 1,509 | 1,505 | 18.1 ± 1.2 | 7.8 ± 0.7 | RI, MS | |
| Globulol | 171 | 1,575 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | – | RI, MS |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 1,575 | 1,578 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | – | RI, MS |
| Viridiflorol | 1,607 | 1,612 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | – | RI, MS |
| Cubenol | 1,634 | 1,642 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | – | RI, MS |
| Patchouli alcohol | 1,677 | 1,680 | 38.7 ± 2.7 | 37.5 ± 2.1 | std, RI, MS |
| 1,721 | 1,718 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | – | RI, MS | |
| Leden oxide (I) | 1,876 | 1,890 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | – | RI, MS |
| Hexadecanoic acid | 1,958 | 1,964 | – | 2.1 ± 0.2 | RI, MS |
| Octadecenoic acid | 2,147 | 2,140 | – | 6.4 ± 0.5 | RI, MS |
| Octadecanoic acid | 2,186 | 2,188 | – | 2.4 ± 0.3 | RI, MS |
| Docosane | 2,213 | 2,208 | – | 2.3 ± 0.3 | RI, MS |
| Tetracosane | 2,395 | 2,402 | – | 2.1 ± 0.3 | RI, MS |
| Squalene | 2,837 | 2,829 | – | 1.3 ± 0.2 | RI, MS |
| Non-acosane | 2,891 | 2,900 | – | 0.8 ± 0.2 | RI, MS |
| Tricontane | 2,989 | 3,000 | – | 0.9 ± 0.2 | RI, MS |
| Total identified (%) | 96.9 | 93.5 | |||
|
| |||||
| Monoterpene hydrocarbons (%) | 0.7 | – | |||
| Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (%) | 55.5 | 34.1 | |||
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes (%) | 40.6 | 38.7 | |||
| Aldehydes | – | 3.0 | |||
| Long chain fatty acids | – | 10.9 | |||
| Long chain hydrocarbons | – | 5.0 | |||
Compounds are listed in order of their elution from a HP-5MS column.
Retention index on HP-5MS column, experimentally determined using homologous series of C.
Retention index taken from Adams (2007), NIST (2012) and WILEY libraries.
Relative area % values are expressed as means ± SD.
Identification methods: std, based on comparison with reference standard; RI, based on comparison of calculated RI with those reported in Adams and NIST; MS, based on comparison with WILEY and NIST 12 MS databases.
Figure 1GC-MS fragmentation pattern of the most abundant patchouli alcohol characterized in EO and HE of P. cablin.
Figure 2Critical micelle concentration (CMC) of biosurfactant, saponin as measured by electrical conductance (EC).
Figure 3Visual appearance of CEs and different concentrations of NEs of (A) EO and (B) HE of P. cablin.
Physico-chemical characterizations of NEs loaded with EO and HE of P. cablin leaves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 500 | 71.68 ± 0.84 | −29.21 ± 0.49 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 4.58 |
| 250 | 62.25 ± 0.30 | −27.42 ± 0.12 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 4.95 |
| 125 | 58.43 ± 076 | −23.49 ± 1.52 | 0.55 ± 0.03 | 5.28 |
| 62.5 | 57.82 ± 0.67 | −23.03 ± 0.91 | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 5.99 |
| 31.25 | 46.19 ± 0.75 | −22.62 ± 0.12 | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 6.40 |
|
| ||||
| 500 | 89.87 ± 0.62 | −29.06 ±0.21 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 4.18 |
| 250 | 67.93 ± 0.64 | −29.18 ± 2.34 | 0.57 ± 0.05 | 4.59 |
| 125 | 61.40 ± 0.90 | −27.28 ± 1.07 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 4.84 |
| 62.5 | 56.67 ± 0.76 | −20.55 ± 0.58 | 0.67 ± 0.03 | 5.62 |
| 31.25 | 49.13 ± 0.5 | −26.50 ± 0.48 | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 6.01 |
Mean diameter of droplets are expressed in mean ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 4(A) Particle size distribution and (B) zeta potential of 500 μg mL−1 concentration of NEs of EO. (C) Particle size distribution and (D) zeta potential of 500 μg mL−1 concentration of NEs of HE.
Figure 5TEM image of 500 μg mL−1 concentration of (A) NE of EO (B) NE of HE.
Contact toxicity of CEs and NEs against the adults of T. urticae after 24 and 48 h of treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| CE-EO | 24 | 223.6 | 188.5 | 293.1 | 0.85 ± 0.32 | −3.39 ± 1.35 | 29.0 | 25 |
| 48 | 134.9 | 105.3 | 154.3 | 1.21 ± 0.13 | −1.56 ± 0.97 | 57.2 | 34 | |
| CE-HE | 24 | 235.6 | 194.2 | 301.1 | 1.03 ± 0.77 | −1.86 ± 1.11 | 25.3 | 18 |
| 48 | 168.7 | 113.5 | 224.0 | 0.56 ± 0.09 | −3.23 ± 1.32 | 18.4 | 12 | |
| NE-EO | 24 | 89.7 | 61.2 | 113.2 | 0.95 ± 0.38 | −2.60 ± 0.52 | 32.2 | 27 |
| 48 | 43.2 | 29.6 | 75.1 | 0.87 ± 0.25 | −4.17 ± 1.92 | 13.0 | 9 | |
| NE-HE | 24 | 97.2 | 63.6 | 144.5 | 0.44 ± 0.17 | −3.27 ± 1.18 | 39.1 | 28 |
| 48 | 58.4 | 24.7 | 72.9 | 1.35 ± 0.70 | −1.03 ± 0.69 | 18.6 | 22 | |
LC.
Slope at the response of regression equation ± standard error.
Intercept of the regression equation ± SE.
χ.
Fumigant activity of CEs and NEs against the adults of T. urticae after 24 h of treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| CE-EO | 35.8 | 21.7 | 47.9 | 2.28 ± 0.29 | −2.18 ± 0.69 | 34.6 | 29 |
| CE-HE | 52.4 | 27.8 | 72.1 | 3.94 ± 0.35 | −3.25 ± 0.68 | 22.2 | 16 |
| NE-EO | 13.7 | 11.6 | 23.5 | 4.12 ± 0.35 | −2.28 ± 0.65 | 56.1 | 30 |
| NE-HE | 19.4 | 12.9 | 31.6 | 2.71 ± 0.34 | −1.44 ± 0.72 | 28.3 | 23 |
LC.
Slope at the response of regression equation ± standard error.
Intercept of the regression equation ± SE.
χ.
Contact toxicity of CEs and NEs against third instar larvae of S. litura using leaf dip assay after 24 and 48 h.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| CE-EO | 24 | 413.2 | 395.6 | 449.5 | 3.33 ± 0.22 | −4.29 ± 0.18 | 23.7 | 13 |
| 48 | 420.5 | 301.7 | 442.3 | 1.48 ± 0.13 | −2.69 ± 0.29 | 39.4 | 21 | |
| CE-HE | 24 | 569.7 | 423.5 | 599.8 | 2.61 ± 0.18 | −3.14 ± 0.23 | 18.8 | 15 |
| 48 | 509.1 | 483.1 | 524.4 | 2.25 ± 0.23 | −1.25 ± 0.27 | 19.2 | 10 | |
| NE-EO | 24 | 145.9 | 137.2 | 159.7 | 2.18 ± 0.22 | −2.73 ± 0.22 | 36.5 | 26 |
| 48 | 125.8 | 117.2 | 144.3 | 1.17 ± 0.19 | −2.28 ± 0.25 | 44.8 | 16 | |
| NE-HE | 24 | 190.6 | 172.9 | 205.3 | 1.42 ± 0.20 | −1.64 ± 0.30 | 52.3 | 26 |
| 48 | 167.5 | 147.0 | 191.6 | 2.22 ± 0.16 | −3.39 ± 0.27 | 17.2 | 13 | |
LC.
Slope at the response of regression equation ± standard error.
Intercept of the regression equation ± SE.
χ.
Figure 6Visual display of antifeedant action of NEs of (A) EO and (B) HE against S. litura third instar larvae after 24 h.
Evaluation of CEs and NEs of EO and HE of P. cablin for determination of antifeedant index (AI) and feeding index (FI) after 24 h.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 500 | 89.75 ± 1.12e | 81.73 ± 1.04e | 87.55 ± 2.45e | 77.86 ± 2.38e | 99.21 ± 0.14e | 99.73 ± 1.24d | 98.75 ± 1.02de | 97.34 ± 1.05de |
| 250 | 85.26 ± 2.45d | 74.29 ± 3.74d | 77.75 ± 1.15d | 63.60 ± 2.45d | 97.01 ± 1.10d | 97.86 ± 1.33d | 98.11 ± 1.68d | 96.31 ± 2.10d |
| 125 | 70.78 ± 1.39 | 54.77 ± 2.22 | 65.43 ± 2.50 | 48.62 ± 3.57d | 86.72 ± 2.21 | 76.56 ± 2.88 | 84.81 ± 2.30 | 73.63 ± 3.48 |
| 62.5 | 55.63 ± 1.08 | 38.53 ± 0.89 | 52.72 ± 4.22 | 35.79 ± 2.10d | 80.08 ± 1.62 | 66.80 ± 3.06 | 76.08 ± 2.45 | 61.39 ± 1.15 |
| 31.25 | 35.66 ± 3.06 | 21.30 ± 1.33 | 33.91 ± 3.56 | 20.42 ± 3.16d | 72.36 ± 1.74 | 56.69 ± 1.22 | 70.29 ± 1.10 | 54.20 ± 0.74 |
Data are presented as means ± SD;
Antifeedant index (AI) is calculated as AI = (1 – T/C) × 100,
Feeding index (FI) is calculated as FI = (C–T)/(C + T) × 100.